Prescription Opioid Use in Older Adults: Trends and Changes in New and Long-Term Use in the United States, 2013-2020.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Drugs & Aging Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-28 DOI:10.1007/s40266-025-01237-x
Kaustuv Bhattacharya, Shadi Bazzazzadehgan, Nga Weng Ivy Leong, Sujith Ramachandran, Ike Eriator, John P Bentley, Yi Yang
{"title":"Prescription Opioid Use in Older Adults: Trends and Changes in New and Long-Term Use in the United States, 2013-2020.","authors":"Kaustuv Bhattacharya, Shadi Bazzazzadehgan, Nga Weng Ivy Leong, Sujith Ramachandran, Ike Eriator, John P Bentley, Yi Yang","doi":"10.1007/s40266-025-01237-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is limited knowledge regarding prescription opioid use following the release of the 2016 CDC guidelines, which recommended prioritizing non-opioid therapies for chronic pain, prescribing the lowest effective opioid dose for the shortest duration, and closely monitoring to minimize risks. This study evaluated trends in new and long-term prescription opioid use among older Medicare beneficiaries from January 2013 to September 2020.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cohort study utilized 5% national Medicare claims data from 2012 to 2020, including older Medicare beneficiaries (≥ 65 years) with Parts A, B, and D, but not Part C enrollment for at least 10 months in a year. Annual utilization of individual demographic and clinical characteristics, average morphine milligram equivalent (MME) of new prescriptions, percentage of high-dose new prescriptions (MME ≥ 50) users, percentage of short-acting formulation users, and the average days of supply of new prescriptions were reported. Trends in new and long-term prescription opioid use were measured and changes over time were assessed using joinpoint regression. Sensitivity analyses were performed to determine whether subgroups defined by race, region, and clinical characteristics followed the national trend over the study years or deviated from it.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included approximately 2.75 million Medicare beneficiaries annually, mostly women (56%) and white (81%), with a mean age of 75 years. The percentage of beneficiaries with at least one new prescription opioid use increased from 6.6% in 2013 to 10.1% in 2016 (annual percentage change (APC) = 14.2; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.2-50.0) and significantly decreased afterward to 5.4% in 2020 (APC = -15.3; 95% CI: -32.2 to -9.1). The percentage of individuals with long-term opioid use among new prescription opioid users decreased steadily from 12.4% in 2013 to 8.6% in 2017 (APC = -11.6; 95% CI: -24.2 to -5.7). It increased afterward to 10.7% in 2020, although non-significant (APC = 7.4; 95% CI: -2.8 to 24.2). Sensitivity analyses demonstrate that subgroups defined by race, region, and clinical characteristics generally followed the national trend in new long-term opioid therapy episodes over the study years, with minimal difference in inflection points. The mean (SD) MME per new prescription declined from 31.5 (27.44) in 2013 to 26.82 (17.48) in 2020, and the percentage of high-dose prescription users fell from 15.3% in 2013 to 7.6% in 2020. Short-acting formulation users rose from 97.41% in 2013 to 99.41% in 2020, while the average (SD) days of supply per new prescription decreased from 21.91 (23.49) to 12.40 (15.27).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A comprehensive assessment of trends in prescription opioid use before and after the release of the 2016 CDC guidelines suggested an overall decline in new and long-term prescription opioid use among older adults, as well as average dose and percentage of high-dose prescription opioid users.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"887-898"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12436516/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-025-01237-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is limited knowledge regarding prescription opioid use following the release of the 2016 CDC guidelines, which recommended prioritizing non-opioid therapies for chronic pain, prescribing the lowest effective opioid dose for the shortest duration, and closely monitoring to minimize risks. This study evaluated trends in new and long-term prescription opioid use among older Medicare beneficiaries from January 2013 to September 2020.

Methods: This cohort study utilized 5% national Medicare claims data from 2012 to 2020, including older Medicare beneficiaries (≥ 65 years) with Parts A, B, and D, but not Part C enrollment for at least 10 months in a year. Annual utilization of individual demographic and clinical characteristics, average morphine milligram equivalent (MME) of new prescriptions, percentage of high-dose new prescriptions (MME ≥ 50) users, percentage of short-acting formulation users, and the average days of supply of new prescriptions were reported. Trends in new and long-term prescription opioid use were measured and changes over time were assessed using joinpoint regression. Sensitivity analyses were performed to determine whether subgroups defined by race, region, and clinical characteristics followed the national trend over the study years or deviated from it.

Results: The study included approximately 2.75 million Medicare beneficiaries annually, mostly women (56%) and white (81%), with a mean age of 75 years. The percentage of beneficiaries with at least one new prescription opioid use increased from 6.6% in 2013 to 10.1% in 2016 (annual percentage change (APC) = 14.2; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.2-50.0) and significantly decreased afterward to 5.4% in 2020 (APC = -15.3; 95% CI: -32.2 to -9.1). The percentage of individuals with long-term opioid use among new prescription opioid users decreased steadily from 12.4% in 2013 to 8.6% in 2017 (APC = -11.6; 95% CI: -24.2 to -5.7). It increased afterward to 10.7% in 2020, although non-significant (APC = 7.4; 95% CI: -2.8 to 24.2). Sensitivity analyses demonstrate that subgroups defined by race, region, and clinical characteristics generally followed the national trend in new long-term opioid therapy episodes over the study years, with minimal difference in inflection points. The mean (SD) MME per new prescription declined from 31.5 (27.44) in 2013 to 26.82 (17.48) in 2020, and the percentage of high-dose prescription users fell from 15.3% in 2013 to 7.6% in 2020. Short-acting formulation users rose from 97.41% in 2013 to 99.41% in 2020, while the average (SD) days of supply per new prescription decreased from 21.91 (23.49) to 12.40 (15.27).

Conclusions: A comprehensive assessment of trends in prescription opioid use before and after the release of the 2016 CDC guidelines suggested an overall decline in new and long-term prescription opioid use among older adults, as well as average dose and percentage of high-dose prescription opioid users.

Abstract Image

老年人处方阿片类药物使用:2013-2020年美国新用药和长期用药的趋势和变化
背景:2016年CDC指南发布后,关于处方阿片类药物使用的知识有限,该指南建议优先考虑非阿片类药物治疗慢性疼痛,处方最低有效阿片类药物剂量最短持续时间,并密切监测以尽量减少风险。本研究评估了2013年1月至2020年9月老年医疗保险受益人中新的和长期处方阿片类药物使用的趋势。方法:本队列研究利用2012年至2020年5%的国家医疗保险索赔数据,包括一年中至少10个月参加A、B、D部分而非C部分的老年医疗保险受益人(≥65岁)。报告了个人人口统计学和临床特征、新处方的平均吗啡毫克当量(MME)、高剂量新处方(MME≥50)使用者百分比、短效制剂使用者百分比和新处方的平均供应天数。测量了新的和长期处方阿片类药物使用的趋势,并使用关节点回归评估了随时间的变化。进行敏感性分析以确定由种族、地区和临床特征定义的亚组在研究期间是否遵循国家趋势或偏离国家趋势。结果:该研究包括每年约275万医疗保险受益人,其中大多数是女性(56%)和白人(81%),平均年龄为75岁。至少有一种新的处方阿片类药物使用的受益人百分比从2013年的6.6%增加到2016年的10.1%(年百分比变化(APC) = 14.2;95%置信区间(CI): 2.2-50.0),随后显著下降至2020年的5.4% (APC = -15.3;95% CI: -32.2至-9.1)。在新的处方阿片类药物使用者中,长期使用阿片类药物的个人比例从2013年的12.4%稳步下降到2017年的8.6% (APC = -11.6;95% CI: -24.2至-5.7)。随后上升到2020年的10.7%,尽管不显著(APC = 7.4;95% CI: -2.8 ~ 24.2)。敏感性分析表明,在研究期间,由种族、地区和临床特征定义的亚组通常遵循新的长期阿片类药物治疗发作的全国趋势,拐点差异极小。每个新处方的平均(SD) MME从2013年的31.5(27.44)下降到2020年的26.82(17.48),高剂量处方使用者的比例从2013年的15.3%下降到2020年的7.6%。短效制剂用户从2013年的97.41%上升到2020年的99.41%,而每张新处方的平均供应天数(SD)从21.91(23.49)天下降到12.40(15.27)天。结论:对2016年CDC指南发布前后处方阿片类药物使用趋势的综合评估表明,老年人新的和长期处方阿片类药物使用总体下降,高剂量处方阿片类药物使用者的平均剂量和百分比也有所下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drugs & Aging
Drugs & Aging 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs & Aging delivers essential information on the most important aspects of drug therapy to professionals involved in the care of the elderly. The journal addresses in a timely way the major issues relating to drug therapy in older adults including: the management of specific diseases, particularly those associated with aging, age-related physiological changes impacting drug therapy, drug utilization and prescribing in the elderly, polypharmacy and drug interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信