Dynamic versus fixed cerebral perfusion pressure targets in paediatric traumatic brain injury: a STARSHIP analysis.

IF 10 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
EClinicalMedicine Pub Date : 2025-07-17 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103370
C A Smith, S Y Bögli, M M Placek, M Cabeleira, D White, E Daubney, A Young, E Beqiri, R Kayani, R O'Donnell, N Pathan, S Watson, A Maw, M Garnett, H K Kanthimathinathan, H Bangalore, S Sundararajan, G Subramanian, D Raffaj, S Lampariello, A Sarfatti, A Mayer, O Ross, M Czosnyka, P J Hutchinson, P Smielewski, S Agrawal
{"title":"Dynamic versus fixed cerebral perfusion pressure targets in paediatric traumatic brain injury: a STARSHIP analysis.","authors":"C A Smith, S Y Bögli, M M Placek, M Cabeleira, D White, E Daubney, A Young, E Beqiri, R Kayani, R O'Donnell, N Pathan, S Watson, A Maw, M Garnett, H K Kanthimathinathan, H Bangalore, S Sundararajan, G Subramanian, D Raffaj, S Lampariello, A Sarfatti, A Mayer, O Ross, M Czosnyka, P J Hutchinson, P Smielewski, S Agrawal","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) represents a key target for intensive care management of paediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. Current guidelines recommend a CPP target within the range of 40-50 mmHg but emphasise that these may depend on patient age and the state of cerebrovascular autoregulation. In this analysis, we aimed to compare the fixed targets proposed by the Brain Trauma Foundation to autoregulation-based targets CPPopt (optimal CPP) and LLA (Lower Limit of Autoregulation).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were acquired from the STARSHIP study (a prospective, multicentre, observational, research study which enrolled 135 children (median age 96 months (interquartile range 26-152 months)) with TBI between July 2018 and March 2023 across 10 paediatric intensive care units in the UK). In this secondary analysis the dose or percentage time spent below a fixed CPP target of 50 mmHg or CPPopt or LLA (assessed continuously on a minute-by-minute basis and derived by fitting a curve to the relationship between CPP and pressure reactivity index values, as previously described) was compared by outcome using univariable and multivariable methods. ClinicalTrials.gov registration-NCT0688462.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>When assessed within ordinal analyses (to account for differences in baseline severity), both hourly dose and percentage time spent below LLA (odds ratio 1.01 [95% CI 1.00-1.02], p = 0.017 and 1.05 [95% CI 1.01-1.08], p = 0.008 respectively) were independently associated with worse outcomes. LLA displayed a dynamic time-trend increasing over time in patients with unfavourable outcome (n = 44, p = 0.003). Overall, LLA exceeded 50 mmHg for more than 45% of the monitoring period across all patients, and for over 35% of the time in the youngest cohort (0-2 years).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Dynamic autoregulation monitoring based on LLA was associated with outcomes in paediatric TBI with higher LLA values observed in individuals experiencing unfavourable outcomes. Our findings indicate that the current fixed CPP threshold of 40-50 mmHg may be too low-highlighting the need for further investigation into autoregulation-guided CPP targets. Whether personalised management based on autoregulatory-informed thresholds offers advantages over guideline-based targets remains to be determined and should be investigated in future prospective interventional studies.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Action Medical Research for Childrens' Charity and Addenbrookes Charitable Trust (UK Grant number-GN2609).</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"86 ","pages":"103370"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12303001/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103370","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) represents a key target for intensive care management of paediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. Current guidelines recommend a CPP target within the range of 40-50 mmHg but emphasise that these may depend on patient age and the state of cerebrovascular autoregulation. In this analysis, we aimed to compare the fixed targets proposed by the Brain Trauma Foundation to autoregulation-based targets CPPopt (optimal CPP) and LLA (Lower Limit of Autoregulation).

Methods: Data were acquired from the STARSHIP study (a prospective, multicentre, observational, research study which enrolled 135 children (median age 96 months (interquartile range 26-152 months)) with TBI between July 2018 and March 2023 across 10 paediatric intensive care units in the UK). In this secondary analysis the dose or percentage time spent below a fixed CPP target of 50 mmHg or CPPopt or LLA (assessed continuously on a minute-by-minute basis and derived by fitting a curve to the relationship between CPP and pressure reactivity index values, as previously described) was compared by outcome using univariable and multivariable methods. ClinicalTrials.gov registration-NCT0688462.

Findings: When assessed within ordinal analyses (to account for differences in baseline severity), both hourly dose and percentage time spent below LLA (odds ratio 1.01 [95% CI 1.00-1.02], p = 0.017 and 1.05 [95% CI 1.01-1.08], p = 0.008 respectively) were independently associated with worse outcomes. LLA displayed a dynamic time-trend increasing over time in patients with unfavourable outcome (n = 44, p = 0.003). Overall, LLA exceeded 50 mmHg for more than 45% of the monitoring period across all patients, and for over 35% of the time in the youngest cohort (0-2 years).

Interpretation: Dynamic autoregulation monitoring based on LLA was associated with outcomes in paediatric TBI with higher LLA values observed in individuals experiencing unfavourable outcomes. Our findings indicate that the current fixed CPP threshold of 40-50 mmHg may be too low-highlighting the need for further investigation into autoregulation-guided CPP targets. Whether personalised management based on autoregulatory-informed thresholds offers advantages over guideline-based targets remains to be determined and should be investigated in future prospective interventional studies.

Funding: Action Medical Research for Childrens' Charity and Addenbrookes Charitable Trust (UK Grant number-GN2609).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

儿童外伤性脑损伤的动态与固定脑灌注压目标:STARSHIP分析。
背景:脑灌注压(CPP)是儿科创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者重症监护管理的关键指标。目前的指南建议CPP目标在40-50 mmHg范围内,但强调这可能取决于患者的年龄和脑血管自动调节状态。在本分析中,我们将脑外伤基金会提出的固定靶点与基于自调节的靶点CPPopt (optimal CPP)和LLA (Lower Limit of Autoregulation)进行比较。方法:数据来自STARSHIP研究(一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性研究,在2018年7月至2023年3月期间,在英国10个儿科重症监护室招募了135名TBI儿童(中位年龄96个月(四分位数范围26-152个月))。在此二次分析中,使用单变量和多变量方法比较了低于固定CPP目标(50 mmHg或CPPopt或LLA)的剂量或时间百分比(按分钟连续评估,并通过拟合CPP与压力反应性指数值之间的关系曲线得出,如前所述)。ClinicalTrials.gov registration-NCT0688462。结果:当在顺序分析中进行评估时(考虑基线严重程度的差异),小时剂量和低于LLA的时间百分比(比值比分别为1.01 [95% CI 1.00-1.02], p = 0.017和1.05 [95% CI 1.01-1.08], p = 0.008)与较差的结果独立相关。不良预后患者的LLA随时间呈动态增长趋势(n = 44, p = 0.003)。总体而言,在所有患者中,LLA超过50 mmHg的监测期超过45%,在最年轻的队列(0-2岁)中超过35%的时间。解释:基于LLA的动态自动调节监测与儿科TBI的结果相关,在经历不利结果的个体中观察到较高的LLA值。我们的研究结果表明,目前固定的CPP阈值40-50 mmHg可能太低,这突出表明需要进一步研究自动调节引导的CPP目标。基于自调节知情阈值的个性化管理是否比基于指南的目标更有优势仍有待确定,并应在未来的前瞻性介入研究中进行调查。资助:儿童慈善医学研究行动和阿登布鲁克斯慈善信托基金(联合王国赠款号:gn2609)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EClinicalMedicine
EClinicalMedicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信