Clinically Meaningful Improvements in Adolescents with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis Treated with Tralokinumab who did not Achieve Clear or Almost Clear Skin at Week 16.

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Dermatology and Therapy Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-28 DOI:10.1007/s13555-025-01484-1
Amy S Paller, Andrew Blauvelt, Weily Soong, H Chih-Ho Hong, Marie L A Schuttelaar, Shannon K R Schneider, Eric L Simpson
{"title":"Clinically Meaningful Improvements in Adolescents with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis Treated with Tralokinumab who did not Achieve Clear or Almost Clear Skin at Week 16.","authors":"Amy S Paller, Andrew Blauvelt, Weily Soong, H Chih-Ho Hong, Marie L A Schuttelaar, Shannon K R Schneider, Eric L Simpson","doi":"10.1007/s13555-025-01484-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) of clear/almost clear (0/1) skin is a high standard to achieve after 16 weeks of treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) and does not capture clinically meaningful responses in other patient domains, such as improvement in itch and/or quality of life. To better evaluate the effect of tralokinumab in adolescents, we assessed the clinically meaningful impact of tralokinumab versus placebo in patients who did not meet IGA 0/1 at week 16 without rescue medication in ECZTRA 6.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>These post hoc analyses included adolescents from the ECZTRA 6 (NCT03526861) phase 3 trial who did not achieve IGA 0/1 at week 16 without rescue medication (referred to as IGA >1). Clinically meaningful responses were defined as either ≥50% improvement from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-50), ≥3-point improvement in Adolescent Worst Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (itch NRS), or ≥6-point improvement in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) at week 16.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among IGA >1 patients (n = 247), significantly greater percentages receiving tralokinumab (150 mg or 300 mg) versus placebo achieved EASI-50 (31.2% or 41.3% versus 10.0%), ≥3-point improvement in itch NRS (21.6% or 22.8% versus 8.0%), or ≥1 clinically meaningful measure (36.4% or 52.5% versus 21.1%) at week 16. The majority of IGA >1 patients who continued with open-label tralokinumab beyond week 16 achieved EASI-50 and ≥3-point improvement in itch NRS and about 40% met EASI-90 at week 52.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinically meaningful responses in both clinician-measured and patient-reported outcomes were observed in tralokinumab-treated (150 mg or 300 mg) adolescents who did not achieve IGA 0/1 at week 16 without rescue medication. Utilizing validated outcome measures of both efficacy and patient quality of life, alongside IGA scores, can enhance clinical decision-making regarding tralokinumab treatment responses in adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03526861 (ECZTRA 6); study start date: 19 June 2018; primary completion date: 15 April 2020; study completion date: 16 March 2021. A Graphical Abstract is available for this article.</p>","PeriodicalId":11186,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"2879-2896"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12454845/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-025-01484-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) of clear/almost clear (0/1) skin is a high standard to achieve after 16 weeks of treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) and does not capture clinically meaningful responses in other patient domains, such as improvement in itch and/or quality of life. To better evaluate the effect of tralokinumab in adolescents, we assessed the clinically meaningful impact of tralokinumab versus placebo in patients who did not meet IGA 0/1 at week 16 without rescue medication in ECZTRA 6.

Methods: These post hoc analyses included adolescents from the ECZTRA 6 (NCT03526861) phase 3 trial who did not achieve IGA 0/1 at week 16 without rescue medication (referred to as IGA >1). Clinically meaningful responses were defined as either ≥50% improvement from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-50), ≥3-point improvement in Adolescent Worst Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (itch NRS), or ≥6-point improvement in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) at week 16.

Results: Among IGA >1 patients (n = 247), significantly greater percentages receiving tralokinumab (150 mg or 300 mg) versus placebo achieved EASI-50 (31.2% or 41.3% versus 10.0%), ≥3-point improvement in itch NRS (21.6% or 22.8% versus 8.0%), or ≥1 clinically meaningful measure (36.4% or 52.5% versus 21.1%) at week 16. The majority of IGA >1 patients who continued with open-label tralokinumab beyond week 16 achieved EASI-50 and ≥3-point improvement in itch NRS and about 40% met EASI-90 at week 52.

Conclusions: Clinically meaningful responses in both clinician-measured and patient-reported outcomes were observed in tralokinumab-treated (150 mg or 300 mg) adolescents who did not achieve IGA 0/1 at week 16 without rescue medication. Utilizing validated outcome measures of both efficacy and patient quality of life, alongside IGA scores, can enhance clinical decision-making regarding tralokinumab treatment responses in adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03526861 (ECZTRA 6); study start date: 19 June 2018; primary completion date: 15 April 2020; study completion date: 16 March 2021. A Graphical Abstract is available for this article.

在第16周未达到皮肤清净或几乎清净的曲洛单抗治疗的中重度特应性皮炎青少年患者的临床意义改善
研究者的整体评估(IGA)皮肤清晰/几乎清晰(0/1)是中重度特应性皮炎(AD)患者在治疗16周后达到的高标准,但在其他患者领域没有临床意义的反应,如瘙痒和/或生活质量的改善。为了更好地评估曲洛单抗在青少年中的作用,我们在ECZTRA 6中评估了在第16周未达到IGA 0/1的患者中曲洛单抗与安慰剂的临床意义影响。方法:这些事后分析包括来自ECZTRA 6 (NCT03526861) 3期试验的青少年,他们在第16周没有达到IGA 0/1,没有抢救药物(称为IGA bbb1)。临床有意义的缓解被定义为湿疹面积和严重程度指数(EASI-50)较基线改善≥50%,青少年最严重瘙痒数值评定量表(瘙痒NRS)改善≥3分,或第16周儿童皮肤病生活质量指数(CDLQI)改善≥6分。结果:在IGA bbb1患者(n = 247)中,与安慰剂相比,接受曲洛单抗(150 mg或300 mg)治疗的患者在第16周达到EASI-50的比例(31.2%或41.3%对10.0%),瘙痒NRS改善≥3点(21.6%或22.8%对8.0%),或≥1项临床有意义的测量(36.4%或52.5%对21.1%)。在第16周后继续使用开放标签曲罗单抗的IGA bbb1患者中,大多数达到了EASI-50和瘙痒NRS≥3点的改善,约40%在第52周达到EASI-90。结论:在没有救援药物的情况下,在第16周未达到IGA 0/1的曲洛单抗治疗(150 mg或300 mg)青少年中,临床测量和患者报告的结果均有临床意义的反应。利用有效的疗效和患者生活质量的结果测量,以及IGA评分,可以增强关于曲罗单抗治疗中重度AD青少年的临床决策。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov识别码,NCT03526861 (ECZTRA 6);研究开始日期:2018年6月19日;初步完工日期:2020年4月15日;学习完成日期:2021年3月16日。本文的图形摘要是可用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dermatology and Therapy
Dermatology and Therapy Medicine-Dermatology
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Dermatology and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance). The journal is dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of dermatological therapies. Studies relating to diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health and epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. Areas of focus include, but are not limited to all clinical aspects of dermatology, such as skin pharmacology; skin development and aging; prevention, diagnosis, and management of skin disorders and melanomas; research into dermal structures and pathology; and all areas of aesthetic dermatology, including skin maintenance, dermatological surgery, and lasers. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of pharmaceutical and healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, case reports/case series, trial protocols, and short communications. Dermatology and Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an International and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of quality research, which may be considered of insufficient interest by other journals. The journal appeals to a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信