Differing Definitions of "Outpatient" Surgery Can Influence Study Outcomes Related to Lumbar Fusion.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Junho Song, Ryan Hoang, Timothy Hoang, Jennifer Yu, Justin Tiao, Alexander Yu, Avanish Yendluri, Auston R Locke, Niklas H Koehne, Nikan K Namiri, John J Corvi, Brian H Cho, Samuel K Cho, Saad Chaudhary, Andrew C Hecht
{"title":"Differing Definitions of \"Outpatient\" Surgery Can Influence Study Outcomes Related to Lumbar Fusion.","authors":"Junho Song, Ryan Hoang, Timothy Hoang, Jennifer Yu, Justin Tiao, Alexander Yu, Avanish Yendluri, Auston R Locke, Niklas H Koehne, Nikan K Namiri, John J Corvi, Brian H Cho, Samuel K Cho, Saad Chaudhary, Andrew C Hecht","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether different methods of defining \"outpatient\" surgery influence postoperative outcomes following lumbar fusion.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Lumbar spinal fusion is increasingly performed in outpatient settings due to advancements in techniques and patient selection. However, inconsistencies in the definition of \"outpatient\" surgery can complicate outcome comparisons with patients categorized as outpatient by the hospital may unexpectedly require inpatient admission postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ACS-NSQIP was queried for patients undergoing primary elective lumbar fusion from 2012 to 2022. Those with revision surgeries, infection, malignancy, and nonelective cases were excluded. Two definitions of \"outpatient\" surgery were evaluated: hospital-defined outpatient (HDO) and same-day discharge (SDD). Propensity score matching was used to compare HDO and SDD cohorts to their respective inpatient counterparts. Primary outcomes analyzed included 30-day readmission, reoperation, and postoperative complications. Univariate analyses were performed to compare the risks of complications for HDO and SDD cohorts compared with their inpatient counterparts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 131,113 patients included, 9623 (7.3%) were HDO and 2019 (1.5%) were SDD. In propensity matched cohorts, inpatient lumbar fusion was associated with greater risk of 30-day readmission [odds ratio (OR) 1.148, P<0.001], reoperation (OR: 1.243, P<0.001), mortality (OR: 2.339, P<0.001), pulmonary embolism (OR: 1.790, P=0.002), urinary tract infection (OR: 1.359, P<0.001), and myocardial infarction (OR: 1.773, P=0.003). Compared with the propensity matched SDD cohort, inpatient lumbar fusion was significantly associated with greater rates of readmission (OR: 1.279, P=0.005), reoperation (OR: 1.429, P=0.006), and urinary tract infection (OR: 2.520, P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Discrepancies in outcomes between inpatient and outpatient lumbar fusion were more pronounced with the hospital-defined outpatient definition compared with in the same-day discharge cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001894","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objective: To evaluate whether different methods of defining "outpatient" surgery influence postoperative outcomes following lumbar fusion.

Summary of background data: Lumbar spinal fusion is increasingly performed in outpatient settings due to advancements in techniques and patient selection. However, inconsistencies in the definition of "outpatient" surgery can complicate outcome comparisons with patients categorized as outpatient by the hospital may unexpectedly require inpatient admission postoperatively.

Methods: ACS-NSQIP was queried for patients undergoing primary elective lumbar fusion from 2012 to 2022. Those with revision surgeries, infection, malignancy, and nonelective cases were excluded. Two definitions of "outpatient" surgery were evaluated: hospital-defined outpatient (HDO) and same-day discharge (SDD). Propensity score matching was used to compare HDO and SDD cohorts to their respective inpatient counterparts. Primary outcomes analyzed included 30-day readmission, reoperation, and postoperative complications. Univariate analyses were performed to compare the risks of complications for HDO and SDD cohorts compared with their inpatient counterparts.

Results: Of the 131,113 patients included, 9623 (7.3%) were HDO and 2019 (1.5%) were SDD. In propensity matched cohorts, inpatient lumbar fusion was associated with greater risk of 30-day readmission [odds ratio (OR) 1.148, P<0.001], reoperation (OR: 1.243, P<0.001), mortality (OR: 2.339, P<0.001), pulmonary embolism (OR: 1.790, P=0.002), urinary tract infection (OR: 1.359, P<0.001), and myocardial infarction (OR: 1.773, P=0.003). Compared with the propensity matched SDD cohort, inpatient lumbar fusion was significantly associated with greater rates of readmission (OR: 1.279, P=0.005), reoperation (OR: 1.429, P=0.006), and urinary tract infection (OR: 2.520, P<0.001).

Conclusion: Discrepancies in outcomes between inpatient and outpatient lumbar fusion were more pronounced with the hospital-defined outpatient definition compared with in the same-day discharge cohort.

“门诊”手术的不同定义可能影响腰椎融合相关的研究结果。
研究设计:回顾性队列研究。目的:评价界定“门诊”手术的不同方法是否会影响腰椎融合术术后的预后。背景资料总结:由于技术和患者选择的进步,腰椎融合术越来越多地在门诊进行。然而,“门诊”手术定义的不一致会使结果比较复杂化,因为医院将门诊患者分类为门诊患者可能意外地需要术后住院。方法:对2012 - 2022年行择期腰椎融合术的患者进行ACS-NSQIP查询。排除了翻修手术、感染、恶性肿瘤和非选择性病例。评估了“门诊”手术的两种定义:医院定义门诊(HDO)和当日出院(SDD)。倾向评分匹配用于比较HDO和SDD队列与各自的住院患者。分析的主要结果包括30天的再入院、再手术和术后并发症。采用单因素分析比较HDO和SDD组与住院组的并发症风险。结果:纳入的131113例患者中,9623例(7.3%)为HDO, 2019例(1.5%)为SDD。在倾向匹配的队列中,住院腰椎融合术患者30天再入院的风险更高[比值比(OR) 1.148, p]。结论:与当日出院队列相比,住院和门诊腰椎融合术患者的结果差异在医院定义的门诊定义中更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Spine Surgery
Clinical Spine Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
236
期刊介绍: Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure. Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信