Statewide Discharge Data Supports Development of Inclusive Trauma System.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Pascal Osita Udekwu, William Luo, Anquonette Stiles, Sharon Schiro
{"title":"Statewide Discharge Data Supports Development of Inclusive Trauma System.","authors":"Pascal Osita Udekwu, William Luo, Anquonette Stiles, Sharon Schiro","doi":"10.1177/00031348251363513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionVerification by the American College of Surgeons and state designation of trauma centers improve outcomes in trauma care. In regions where participation in trauma systems is optional, legislation requiring inclusion may need evidence of outcome differences. Given the distinct populations treated at trauma centers vs non-trauma centers, validated risk adjustment is essential for fair comparison. The International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision injury severity score (ICISS) has been validated for such assessments.MethodsWith institutional review board approval, data from the state Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project from 2018 to 2020 was analyzed. Using ICISS for risk adjustment, outcomes were compared across overall, age-specific, and diagnosis-specific groups.ResultsAmong 3,316,016 discharges, 245,404 (7.4 percent) included at least one injury diagnosis. After excluding transfers out, 151,855 cases remained. Patients at trauma centers had lower risk-adjusted mortality and fewer occurrences of acute kidney injury and pulmonary embolism but higher rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia and surgical site infections. Subgroup analyses revealed that pediatric patients and those with traumatic brain injuries or shock were predominantly treated at trauma centers. Increased age, higher injury severity, male gender, and non-trauma center treatment were associated with lower survival rates. Among geriatric patients with proximal femur fractures, 63 percent were treated at non-trauma centers, with no observed mortality benefit from trauma center care.ConclusionsTrauma center care is associated with improved outcomes supporting the development of more inclusive trauma systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348251363513"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251363513","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionVerification by the American College of Surgeons and state designation of trauma centers improve outcomes in trauma care. In regions where participation in trauma systems is optional, legislation requiring inclusion may need evidence of outcome differences. Given the distinct populations treated at trauma centers vs non-trauma centers, validated risk adjustment is essential for fair comparison. The International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision injury severity score (ICISS) has been validated for such assessments.MethodsWith institutional review board approval, data from the state Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project from 2018 to 2020 was analyzed. Using ICISS for risk adjustment, outcomes were compared across overall, age-specific, and diagnosis-specific groups.ResultsAmong 3,316,016 discharges, 245,404 (7.4 percent) included at least one injury diagnosis. After excluding transfers out, 151,855 cases remained. Patients at trauma centers had lower risk-adjusted mortality and fewer occurrences of acute kidney injury and pulmonary embolism but higher rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia and surgical site infections. Subgroup analyses revealed that pediatric patients and those with traumatic brain injuries or shock were predominantly treated at trauma centers. Increased age, higher injury severity, male gender, and non-trauma center treatment were associated with lower survival rates. Among geriatric patients with proximal femur fractures, 63 percent were treated at non-trauma centers, with no observed mortality benefit from trauma center care.ConclusionsTrauma center care is associated with improved outcomes supporting the development of more inclusive trauma systems.

全州范围的出院数据支持包容性创伤系统的发展。
美国外科医师学会和国家指定的创伤中心的验证改善了创伤护理的结果。在可选择参与创伤系统的地区,要求纳入的立法可能需要结果差异的证据。鉴于在创伤中心与非创伤中心治疗的不同人群,有效的风险调整对于公平比较至关重要。国际疾病分类第十版损伤严重程度评分(ICISS)已被验证用于此类评估。方法经机构审查委员会批准,对2018 - 2020年国家医疗成本与利用项目数据进行分析。使用ICISS进行风险调整,比较了总体、特定年龄和特定诊断组的结果。结果在3316016例出院患者中,245404例(7.4%)至少有一次损伤诊断。排除转出后,还有151855个病例。创伤中心的患者风险调整死亡率较低,急性肾损伤和肺栓塞发生率较低,但呼吸机相关性肺炎和手术部位感染的发生率较高。亚组分析显示,儿科患者和创伤性脑损伤或休克患者主要在创伤中心接受治疗。年龄增加、损伤严重程度高、男性和非创伤中心治疗与较低的生存率相关。在股骨近端骨折的老年患者中,63%的患者在非创伤中心接受治疗,没有观察到创伤中心护理的死亡率降低。结论创伤中心护理可改善创伤预后,支持更具包容性的创伤系统的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Surgeon
American Surgeon 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊介绍: The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信