The methods for the retrieval of land surface temperature in central Shijiazhuang using ASTER data.

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Biao Zeng, Guo-Fei Shang, Xia Zhang, Ye-Lin Shen, Yu-Jia Tian, Zheng-Hong Yan
{"title":"The methods for the retrieval of land surface temperature in central Shijiazhuang using ASTER data.","authors":"Biao Zeng, Guo-Fei Shang, Xia Zhang, Ye-Lin Shen, Yu-Jia Tian, Zheng-Hong Yan","doi":"10.1007/s10661-025-14418-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Land surface temperature (LST) is crucial for studying climate change, agricultural drought, and ecological evaluation. Satellite thermal infrared remote sensing, such as the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER), provides high-resolution (90 m) LST data. However, inversion accuracy varies by region and method. This study focuses on Shijiazhuang, using ASTER data and three algorithms-reference channel method, split-window algorithm, and temperature and emissivity separation algorithm-to invert LST. Data were preprocessed using ENVI, ARCGIS, MODTRAN, and MATLAB. Authenticity tests and accuracy evaluations were conducted based on meteorological data, Landsat data, and MODIS products. Results show that the temperature and emissivity separation algorithm has the highest accuracy and is most suitable for the study area. Inversion results range from 274 to 310 K, with mean temperatures of 293.18 K (reference channel) and 293.15 K (temperature and emissivity separation). The split-window algorithm has a lower low-temperature value (274.27 K) and a higher high-temperature value (308.10 K). The accuracy difference between algorithms and average surface temperature is 3.87-4.08 °C. Spatial distribution and linear fitting of pixel values are consistent across algorithms. Correlation analysis with MODIS products shows R<sup>2</sup> values of 0.72, 0.72, and 0.72, with the temperature and emissivity separation algorithm having the highest correlation. Conclusions indicate that the temperature and emissivity separation algorithm is the optimal method for LST inversion in Shijiazhuang's urban area, providing a reliable approach for high-precision monitoring and data-scarce regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":544,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","volume":"197 8","pages":"962"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-025-14418-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Land surface temperature (LST) is crucial for studying climate change, agricultural drought, and ecological evaluation. Satellite thermal infrared remote sensing, such as the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER), provides high-resolution (90 m) LST data. However, inversion accuracy varies by region and method. This study focuses on Shijiazhuang, using ASTER data and three algorithms-reference channel method, split-window algorithm, and temperature and emissivity separation algorithm-to invert LST. Data were preprocessed using ENVI, ARCGIS, MODTRAN, and MATLAB. Authenticity tests and accuracy evaluations were conducted based on meteorological data, Landsat data, and MODIS products. Results show that the temperature and emissivity separation algorithm has the highest accuracy and is most suitable for the study area. Inversion results range from 274 to 310 K, with mean temperatures of 293.18 K (reference channel) and 293.15 K (temperature and emissivity separation). The split-window algorithm has a lower low-temperature value (274.27 K) and a higher high-temperature value (308.10 K). The accuracy difference between algorithms and average surface temperature is 3.87-4.08 °C. Spatial distribution and linear fitting of pixel values are consistent across algorithms. Correlation analysis with MODIS products shows R2 values of 0.72, 0.72, and 0.72, with the temperature and emissivity separation algorithm having the highest correlation. Conclusions indicate that the temperature and emissivity separation algorithm is the optimal method for LST inversion in Shijiazhuang's urban area, providing a reliable approach for high-precision monitoring and data-scarce regions.

利用ASTER数据反演石家庄市中部地表温度的方法。
地表温度在研究气候变化、农业干旱和生态评价等方面具有重要意义。卫星热红外遥感,如先进星载热发射和反射辐射计(ASTER),提供高分辨率(90米)的地表温度数据。然而,反演精度因地区和方法而异。本文以石家庄市为研究对象,利用ASTER数据,采用参考通道法、分窗法、温度与发射率分离法3种算法反演地表温度。采用ENVI、ARCGIS、MODTRAN和MATLAB对数据进行预处理。基于气象数据、陆地卫星数据和MODIS产品进行了真实性测试和准确性评估。结果表明,温度和发射率分离算法精度最高,最适合研究区域。反演结果范围为274 ~ 310 K,平均温度为293.18 K(参考通道)和293.15 K(温度和发射率分离)。分窗算法低温值较低(274.27 K),高温值较高(308.10 K)。算法与地表平均温度的精度差为3.87 ~ 4.08℃。不同算法像素值的空间分布和线性拟合是一致的。与MODIS产品的相关分析显示,R2值分别为0.72、0.72和0.72,其中温度与发射率分离算法的相关性最高。结论表明,温度和发射率分离算法是石家庄市区地表温度反演的最佳方法,为高精度监测和数据稀缺地区提供了可靠的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1000
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment emphasizes technical developments and data arising from environmental monitoring and assessment, the use of scientific principles in the design of monitoring systems at the local, regional and global scales, and the use of monitoring data in assessing the consequences of natural resource management actions and pollution risks to man and the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信