Urban–rural differences in the age of US physicians

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ryan J. Crowley MPhil, Jag S. Lally MPhil, David M. Kline PhD, Amanda M. Bunting PhD
{"title":"Urban–rural differences in the age of US physicians","authors":"Ryan J. Crowley MPhil,&nbsp;Jag S. Lally MPhil,&nbsp;David M. Kline PhD,&nbsp;Amanda M. Bunting PhD","doi":"10.1111/jrh.70054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To assess county-level and specialty-level age differences between urban and rural physicians.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We linked the 2008–2021 Medicare Data on Provider Practice and Specialty (MD-PPAS) dataset with the 2024 Doctors and Clinicians national downloadable file. We assessed specialty-level differences in the age of rural versus urban physicians using Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (RUCC) with four groups: urban (RUCC 1–3), large rural (RUCC 4–5), small rural (RUCC 6–7), and isolated rural (RUCC 8–9). We analyzed the relationship between rurality and physician age using choropleth graphs, spatial clustering, and univariable regression.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Our final cohort comprised 571,886 physicians. The mean ages of physicians were higher in rural counties (large rural: 53.1 years; small rural: 53.3 years; isolated rural: 53.5 years) than urban counties (52.5 years; <i>p</i> value &lt;0.001). Some specialties including medical oncology, palliative care, and thoracic surgery showed particularly large age differences with older physicians in more rural areas. There were clusters of older physicians in the South and clusters of younger physicians in the Mountain West and Midwest. Rurality was strongly associated with clusters of older physicians (odds ratio [OR]: 3.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6–5.5), and the percentage of households with broadband internet subscription was strongly associated with clusters of younger physicians (OR: 2.6; 95% CI, 2.2–3.0).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Rural physicians were older than urban physicians with certain specialties and regions demonstrating large age disparities. The aging of rural physicians could worsen existing urban–rural health care disparities. Initiatives focusing on recruiting and retaining rural physicians should target specific regions and specialties to ameliorate these inequities.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.70054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To assess county-level and specialty-level age differences between urban and rural physicians.

Methods

We linked the 2008–2021 Medicare Data on Provider Practice and Specialty (MD-PPAS) dataset with the 2024 Doctors and Clinicians national downloadable file. We assessed specialty-level differences in the age of rural versus urban physicians using Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (RUCC) with four groups: urban (RUCC 1–3), large rural (RUCC 4–5), small rural (RUCC 6–7), and isolated rural (RUCC 8–9). We analyzed the relationship between rurality and physician age using choropleth graphs, spatial clustering, and univariable regression.

Findings

Our final cohort comprised 571,886 physicians. The mean ages of physicians were higher in rural counties (large rural: 53.1 years; small rural: 53.3 years; isolated rural: 53.5 years) than urban counties (52.5 years; p value <0.001). Some specialties including medical oncology, palliative care, and thoracic surgery showed particularly large age differences with older physicians in more rural areas. There were clusters of older physicians in the South and clusters of younger physicians in the Mountain West and Midwest. Rurality was strongly associated with clusters of older physicians (odds ratio [OR]: 3.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6–5.5), and the percentage of households with broadband internet subscription was strongly associated with clusters of younger physicians (OR: 2.6; 95% CI, 2.2–3.0).

Conclusions

Rural physicians were older than urban physicians with certain specialties and regions demonstrating large age disparities. The aging of rural physicians could worsen existing urban–rural health care disparities. Initiatives focusing on recruiting and retaining rural physicians should target specific regions and specialties to ameliorate these inequities.

美国医生年龄的城乡差异
目的评价城乡医生在县级和专科水平上的年龄差异。方法:我们将2008-2021年医疗保险提供者实践和专业数据(MD-PPAS)数据集与2024年医生和临床医生国家可下载文件联系起来。我们使用城乡连续代码(RUCC)评估了农村医生与城市医生在专业水平上的年龄差异,分为四组:城市(RUCC 1-3)、大农村(RUCC 4-5)、小农村(RUCC 6-7)和偏远农村(RUCC 8-9)。我们使用人口密度图、空间聚类和单变量回归分析了乡村性和医生年龄之间的关系。我们的最终队列包括571,886名医生。农村医生的平均年龄较高(大农村:53.1岁;小农村:53.3岁;孤立的农村:53.5年)比城市县(52.5年;P值<;0.001)。包括肿瘤内科、姑息治疗和胸外科在内的一些专业与农村地区的老年医生表现出特别大的年龄差异。南部有老医生群,西部山区和中西部有年轻医生群。乡村性与老年医生聚集密切相关(优势比[OR]: 3.8;95%可信区间[CI], 2.6 - 5.5),拥有宽带互联网订阅的家庭百分比与年轻医生群体密切相关(OR: 2.6;95% ci, 2.2-3.0)。结论在某些专科和地区,农村医生年龄大于城市医生,且存在较大的年龄差异。农村医生的老龄化可能会加剧现有的城乡医疗保健差距。注重招募和留住农村医生的举措应针对特定地区和专业,以改善这些不公平现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Rural Health
Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信