Conceptual framework for prediction models of patient deterioration based on nursing documentation patterns: reproducibility and generalizability with a large number of hospitals across the United States
IF 4.5 2区 医学Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Yik-Ki Jacob Wan , Samir E. Abdelrahman , Julio C. Facelli , Karl Madaras-Kelly , Kensaku Kawamoto , Deniz Dishman , Samuel R. Himes , Kenrick Cato , Sarah C. Rossetti , Guilherme Del Fiol
{"title":"Conceptual framework for prediction models of patient deterioration based on nursing documentation patterns: reproducibility and generalizability with a large number of hospitals across the United States","authors":"Yik-Ki Jacob Wan , Samir E. Abdelrahman , Julio C. Facelli , Karl Madaras-Kelly , Kensaku Kawamoto , Deniz Dishman , Samuel R. Himes , Kenrick Cato , Sarah C. Rossetti , Guilherme Del Fiol","doi":"10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The Health Process Model (HPM)-ExpertSignals Conceptual Framework posits that healthcare professionals’ patient care behaviors can be used to predict in-hospital deterioration. Prediction models based on this framework have been validated using data from 4 hospitals within two healthcare systems. As clinician-system interactions may differ across organizations, this study aimed to evaluate the reproducibility and generalizability of the underlying conceptual framework using data from over 200 hospitals across the US.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study used eICU-CRD, a publicly accessible dataset with data from 208 US hospitals. A logistic regression model was developed to predict in-hospital deterioration following the HPM-ExpertSignals conceptual framework. To test its reproducibility, patients were randomly split into training and testing datasets. After bootstrap testing of the model, the mean precision-recall curve (AUPRC) was compared with outcomes from previously published studies. For generalizability testing, the hospitals in the dataset were randomly assigned into model training or testing sets. After the model was trained with training hospitals’ data, generalizability was measured as the percentage of testing hospitals with an AUPRC at or above a baseline performance obtained in the reproducibility experiment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The AUPRC in the reproducibility experiment was 0.10 (0.09,0.11; 95% CI), equivalent to the AUPRC reported in a previous study at 0.093 (0.09, 0.096; 95% CI). In the generalizability experiment, 94% of the testing hospitals had AUPRC at or above the baseline AUPRC of 0.10.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study provides evidence supporting the reproducibility of a predictive model following the HPM-ExpertSignals framework. This model also generalized to most hospitals without additional training. Nevertheless, some hospitals still obtained lower-than-expected performance, highlighting the need for model evaluation and potential fine-tuning before local adoption. Similar studies are needed to investigate the reproducibility and generalizability of other classes of machine learning models in healthcare.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 104887"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046425001169","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
The Health Process Model (HPM)-ExpertSignals Conceptual Framework posits that healthcare professionals’ patient care behaviors can be used to predict in-hospital deterioration. Prediction models based on this framework have been validated using data from 4 hospitals within two healthcare systems. As clinician-system interactions may differ across organizations, this study aimed to evaluate the reproducibility and generalizability of the underlying conceptual framework using data from over 200 hospitals across the US.
Methods
This study used eICU-CRD, a publicly accessible dataset with data from 208 US hospitals. A logistic regression model was developed to predict in-hospital deterioration following the HPM-ExpertSignals conceptual framework. To test its reproducibility, patients were randomly split into training and testing datasets. After bootstrap testing of the model, the mean precision-recall curve (AUPRC) was compared with outcomes from previously published studies. For generalizability testing, the hospitals in the dataset were randomly assigned into model training or testing sets. After the model was trained with training hospitals’ data, generalizability was measured as the percentage of testing hospitals with an AUPRC at or above a baseline performance obtained in the reproducibility experiment.
Results
The AUPRC in the reproducibility experiment was 0.10 (0.09,0.11; 95% CI), equivalent to the AUPRC reported in a previous study at 0.093 (0.09, 0.096; 95% CI). In the generalizability experiment, 94% of the testing hospitals had AUPRC at or above the baseline AUPRC of 0.10.
Conclusion
The study provides evidence supporting the reproducibility of a predictive model following the HPM-ExpertSignals framework. This model also generalized to most hospitals without additional training. Nevertheless, some hospitals still obtained lower-than-expected performance, highlighting the need for model evaluation and potential fine-tuning before local adoption. Similar studies are needed to investigate the reproducibility and generalizability of other classes of machine learning models in healthcare.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomedical Informatics reflects a commitment to high-quality original research papers, reviews, and commentaries in the area of biomedical informatics methodology. Although we publish articles motivated by applications in the biomedical sciences (for example, clinical medicine, health care, population health, and translational bioinformatics), the journal emphasizes reports of new methodologies and techniques that have general applicability and that form the basis for the evolving science of biomedical informatics. Articles on medical devices; evaluations of implemented systems (including clinical trials of information technologies); or papers that provide insight into a biological process, a specific disease, or treatment options would generally be more suitable for publication in other venues. Papers on applications of signal processing and image analysis are often more suitable for biomedical engineering journals or other informatics journals, although we do publish papers that emphasize the information management and knowledge representation/modeling issues that arise in the storage and use of biological signals and images. System descriptions are welcome if they illustrate and substantiate the underlying methodology that is the principal focus of the report and an effort is made to address the generalizability and/or range of application of that methodology. Note also that, given the international nature of JBI, papers that deal with specific languages other than English, or with country-specific health systems or approaches, are acceptable for JBI only if they offer generalizable lessons that are relevant to the broad JBI readership, regardless of their country, language, culture, or health system.