{"title":"Visions of Tomorrow: Emotional drivers of climate change mitigation and adaptation intentions","authors":"Lucia Bosone , Téophile Rasse , Octavia Ionescu , Marie Chevrier , Julie Collange","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research explores the effects of exposure to utopian vs. dystopian vs. neutral visions of the future (with regards to environmental sustainability or unsustainability) on individuals’ intentions to mitigate and to adapt to climate change, through emotional arousal. In two pre-registered experimental studies, participants were randomly assigned to read about a utopian, dystopian, or neutral vision of future society. In Study 1 (<em>N</em> = 303), behavioural intentions, emotional responses to the scenario (fear, anger, sadness, hope and happiness), the ability to imagine a positive future, and beliefs about sustainable futures were assessed. Results indicated no direct effects of the visions on behavioural intentions, future imagination, or beliefs. However, exposure to a utopian (vs. neutral) and a dystopian (vs. neutral) vision indirectly affect both mitigation and adaptation intentions through feelings of hope (increased and decreased, respectively). Study 2 (<em>N</em> = 401) partially replicated the findings of Study 1. As expected, exposure to a utopian and a dystopian vision indirectly affect mitigation intentions through feelings of hope (increased and decreased, respectively). Adaptation intentions, however, were predicted by happiness rather than hope. These findings highlight the role of positive emotions in promoting pro-environmental intentions and suggest that positive emotions can drive climate actions. While negative emotions like fear, sadness and anger were correlated with intentions, they did not predict behaviours in path analysis. This research underscores the potential of using emotionally engaging future visions to foster sustainable behaviours.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 102700"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425001835","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This research explores the effects of exposure to utopian vs. dystopian vs. neutral visions of the future (with regards to environmental sustainability or unsustainability) on individuals’ intentions to mitigate and to adapt to climate change, through emotional arousal. In two pre-registered experimental studies, participants were randomly assigned to read about a utopian, dystopian, or neutral vision of future society. In Study 1 (N = 303), behavioural intentions, emotional responses to the scenario (fear, anger, sadness, hope and happiness), the ability to imagine a positive future, and beliefs about sustainable futures were assessed. Results indicated no direct effects of the visions on behavioural intentions, future imagination, or beliefs. However, exposure to a utopian (vs. neutral) and a dystopian (vs. neutral) vision indirectly affect both mitigation and adaptation intentions through feelings of hope (increased and decreased, respectively). Study 2 (N = 401) partially replicated the findings of Study 1. As expected, exposure to a utopian and a dystopian vision indirectly affect mitigation intentions through feelings of hope (increased and decreased, respectively). Adaptation intentions, however, were predicted by happiness rather than hope. These findings highlight the role of positive emotions in promoting pro-environmental intentions and suggest that positive emotions can drive climate actions. While negative emotions like fear, sadness and anger were correlated with intentions, they did not predict behaviours in path analysis. This research underscores the potential of using emotionally engaging future visions to foster sustainable behaviours.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space