Grammatoula Papaioannou , Panagiotis Ravanos , Giannis Karagiannis , Victor V. Podinovski
{"title":"Accounting for caseloads in the efficiency analysis of courts of justice","authors":"Grammatoula Papaioannou , Panagiotis Ravanos , Giannis Karagiannis , Victor V. Podinovski","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2025.103401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Many reported applications of data envelopment analysis to courts of justice raise the issue of treatment of caseloads, consisting of the backlog of yet unresolved cases transferred from the previous year and new incoming cases. A common approach, which has some known drawbacks, is to incorporate caseloads as inputs in the model. In this paper, we propose a different methodology addressing this issue. We first assess the efficiency of courts disregarding caseloads and then decompose it into the product of two measures. One is the resolution rate that shows the proportion of caseload (capped by the boundaries of the technology) resolved by the court. The second is the caseload sufficiency factor that reflects the potentially limiting effect of the caseload on the ability of the court to achieve its efficient target. This approach allows straightforward extensions to arbitrary production technologies and different efficiency measures. We illustrate the proposed methodology by an application to a sample of Greek county courts. We show that the proposed methodology has significantly higher discriminating power on court efficiency than the model with caseloads as inputs. It also provides more detailed information about the sources of inefficiency of courts than the latter common approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19529,"journal":{"name":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","volume":"138 ","pages":"Article 103401"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048325001276","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Many reported applications of data envelopment analysis to courts of justice raise the issue of treatment of caseloads, consisting of the backlog of yet unresolved cases transferred from the previous year and new incoming cases. A common approach, which has some known drawbacks, is to incorporate caseloads as inputs in the model. In this paper, we propose a different methodology addressing this issue. We first assess the efficiency of courts disregarding caseloads and then decompose it into the product of two measures. One is the resolution rate that shows the proportion of caseload (capped by the boundaries of the technology) resolved by the court. The second is the caseload sufficiency factor that reflects the potentially limiting effect of the caseload on the ability of the court to achieve its efficient target. This approach allows straightforward extensions to arbitrary production technologies and different efficiency measures. We illustrate the proposed methodology by an application to a sample of Greek county courts. We show that the proposed methodology has significantly higher discriminating power on court efficiency than the model with caseloads as inputs. It also provides more detailed information about the sources of inefficiency of courts than the latter common approach.
期刊介绍:
Omega reports on developments in management, including the latest research results and applications. Original contributions and review articles describe the state of the art in specific fields or functions of management, while there are shorter critical assessments of particular management techniques. Other features of the journal are the "Memoranda" section for short communications and "Feedback", a correspondence column. Omega is both stimulating reading and an important source for practising managers, specialists in management services, operational research workers and management scientists, management consultants, academics, students and research personnel throughout the world. The material published is of high quality and relevance, written in a manner which makes it accessible to all of this wide-ranging readership. Preference will be given to papers with implications to the practice of management. Submissions of purely theoretical papers are discouraged. The review of material for publication in the journal reflects this aim.