Safety and Efficacy of Lutetium-177 PSMA Therapy for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Lutetium-177 PSMA Therapy for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials","authors":"Zineddine Belabaci , Mouhammed Sleiay , Abdelrahman Abdelshafi , Zina Otmani , Elsayed S. Moubarak , Faten Amer","doi":"10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aim</h3><div>Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy using lutetium-177 has emerged as a promising treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the safety and efficacy of PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy (PRLT) using lutetium-177 ([<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA) were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. A detailed searches were conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Scopus for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on [177Lu]Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy in mCRPC. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) responses, toxicity profiles, and outcomes including radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and overall survival were assessed. Quantitative analyses with Review Manager 5.4 software, using Risk estimates (hazard ratios, RR and OR) and 95% confidence intervals for outcomes in random effects were performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Six RCTs involving 2113 patients with mCRPC were included in the meta-analysis. Patients treated with [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA had a significantly higher response to therapy compared to controls based on ≥50% PSA decrease (OR = 4.27; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.59-7.06; <em>P</em> < .00001) and objective response rate (ORR) (RR=2.93; 95% CI, 1.62-5.30; <em>P</em> = .0004). [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA reduced the risk of rPFS (HR=0.57; 95% CI, 0.46-0.70; <em>P</em> < .00001). However, no significant impact on overall survival was observed (HR = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.62-1.06; <em>P</em> = .13). No significant difference in grade ≥3 adverse events was reported (RR = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.63-1.15; <em>P</em> = .32).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings support the use of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, demonstrating both safety profile and efficacy. The potential of this therapeutic approach warrants further investigative efforts to optimize treatment methodologies and improve the quality of patient care and the criteria for patient selection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10380,"journal":{"name":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","volume":"23 5","pages":"Article 102398"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558767325000989","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and aim
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy using lutetium-177 has emerged as a promising treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the safety and efficacy of PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy (PRLT) using lutetium-177 ([177Lu]Lu-PSMA) were assessed.
Methods
This meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. A detailed searches were conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Scopus for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on [177Lu]Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy in mCRPC. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) responses, toxicity profiles, and outcomes including radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and overall survival were assessed. Quantitative analyses with Review Manager 5.4 software, using Risk estimates (hazard ratios, RR and OR) and 95% confidence intervals for outcomes in random effects were performed.
Results
Six RCTs involving 2113 patients with mCRPC were included in the meta-analysis. Patients treated with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA had a significantly higher response to therapy compared to controls based on ≥50% PSA decrease (OR = 4.27; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.59-7.06; P < .00001) and objective response rate (ORR) (RR=2.93; 95% CI, 1.62-5.30; P = .0004). [177Lu]Lu-PSMA reduced the risk of rPFS (HR=0.57; 95% CI, 0.46-0.70; P < .00001). However, no significant impact on overall survival was observed (HR = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.62-1.06; P = .13). No significant difference in grade ≥3 adverse events was reported (RR = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.63-1.15; P = .32).
Conclusion
These findings support the use of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, demonstrating both safety profile and efficacy. The potential of this therapeutic approach warrants further investigative efforts to optimize treatment methodologies and improve the quality of patient care and the criteria for patient selection.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Genitourinary Cancer is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research in genitourinary cancers. Clinical Genitourinary Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of genitourinary cancers. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to genitourinary malignancies. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.