Chun-Hsiung Tseng, Hao-Chiang Koong Lin, Andrew Chih-Wei Huang, Jia-Rou Lin
{"title":"Investigating the effects of PuppyCodeReview, an AI-based code review system, on students’ cognitive load","authors":"Chun-Hsiung Tseng, Hao-Chiang Koong Lin, Andrew Chih-Wei Huang, Jia-Rou Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.softx.2025.102283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents <em>PuppyCodeReview</em>, an AI-based system designed to support code review activities in programming education. While peer code review is increasingly emphasized in computer science curricula, its effectiveness in university classrooms remains uncertain, especially among novice programmers. <em>PuppyCodeReview</em> aims to address this gap by automating the review process and providing structured feedback on design, functionality, complexity, and common code smells. To evaluate the system’s impact, a four-week experiment was conducted in a data structures course at a university in Taiwan. Students were divided into control and experimental groups; the control group used a standard web interface, while the experimental group utilized the AI-assisted <em>PuppyCodeReview</em> system for the same tasks. Cognitive load was measured before and after the intervention. Results indicated that although cognitive load increased in both groups, the increase was significantly smaller for students using <em>PuppyCodeReview</em>, suggesting the system reduced mental effort associated with code review. These findings highlight the potential of AI-assisted tools in making peer review more accessible and pedagogically effective for novice programmers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21905,"journal":{"name":"SoftwareX","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 102283"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SoftwareX","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235271102500250X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study presents PuppyCodeReview, an AI-based system designed to support code review activities in programming education. While peer code review is increasingly emphasized in computer science curricula, its effectiveness in university classrooms remains uncertain, especially among novice programmers. PuppyCodeReview aims to address this gap by automating the review process and providing structured feedback on design, functionality, complexity, and common code smells. To evaluate the system’s impact, a four-week experiment was conducted in a data structures course at a university in Taiwan. Students were divided into control and experimental groups; the control group used a standard web interface, while the experimental group utilized the AI-assisted PuppyCodeReview system for the same tasks. Cognitive load was measured before and after the intervention. Results indicated that although cognitive load increased in both groups, the increase was significantly smaller for students using PuppyCodeReview, suggesting the system reduced mental effort associated with code review. These findings highlight the potential of AI-assisted tools in making peer review more accessible and pedagogically effective for novice programmers.
期刊介绍:
SoftwareX aims to acknowledge the impact of software on today''s research practice, and on new scientific discoveries in almost all research domains. SoftwareX also aims to stress the importance of the software developers who are, in part, responsible for this impact. To this end, SoftwareX aims to support publication of research software in such a way that: The software is given a stamp of scientific relevance, and provided with a peer-reviewed recognition of scientific impact; The software developers are given the credits they deserve; The software is citable, allowing traditional metrics of scientific excellence to apply; The academic career paths of software developers are supported rather than hindered; The software is publicly available for inspection, validation, and re-use. Above all, SoftwareX aims to inform researchers about software applications, tools and libraries with a (proven) potential to impact the process of scientific discovery in various domains. The journal is multidisciplinary and accepts submissions from within and across subject domains such as those represented within the broad thematic areas below: Mathematical and Physical Sciences; Environmental Sciences; Medical and Biological Sciences; Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences. Originating from these broad thematic areas, the journal also welcomes submissions of software that works in cross cutting thematic areas, such as citizen science, cybersecurity, digital economy, energy, global resource stewardship, health and wellbeing, etcetera. SoftwareX specifically aims to accept submissions representing domain-independent software that may impact more than one research domain.