Ivana Komatina , Vedrana Makarić , Miloš Živanović , Paula Toroi , Aino Tietäväinen , Massimo Pinto , Luigi Rinaldi , Markus Borowski , Siarhei Saroka , Nikola Kržanović , Alessia Ciccotelli , Bartel Jansen , Stefan Pojtinger , Ana Fernandes , Vittorio Cannatà , Mika Kortesniemi
{"title":"Calibration services for X-ray multimeters in Europe: current situation and future needs","authors":"Ivana Komatina , Vedrana Makarić , Miloš Živanović , Paula Toroi , Aino Tietäväinen , Massimo Pinto , Luigi Rinaldi , Markus Borowski , Siarhei Saroka , Nikola Kržanović , Alessia Ciccotelli , Bartel Jansen , Stefan Pojtinger , Ana Fernandes , Vittorio Cannatà , Mika Kortesniemi","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.105055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Optimization and quality control of the diagnostic and interventional radiology procedures is usually performed with an X-ray multimeter (XMM) based on the non-invasive measurements of different X-ray tube and output parameters obtained from the X-ray beam, such as air kerma, tube voltage and half-value layer. Standardization and metrological support need to be improved, and harmonized calibration procedures are not available for all quantities. There is also a lack of data on performance of XMMs in different measurement conditions relevant for clinical practice.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The needs for calibration of XMMs and current state of the art of calibration services were investigated by performing an overview of the standards, conducting surveys addressed to the clinical medical physicists and calibration laboratories and investigating the key comparison database.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There are widely available calibration services for air kerma measurements for a large range of radiation qualities. However, there is a lack of calibration services for all other measured quantities, and very few laboratories besides the manufacturers are able to perform these calibrations. In addition, standardization gaps with non-harmonized calibration and measurement procedures for these quantities were found.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>New calibration services with harmonized procedures are needed for XMMs, especially for quantities beyond air kerma. There is a need to better understand and reduce measurement uncertainty for some quantities. New procedures will be developed within the TraMeXI project and disseminated to the standardization bodies, metrology and medical physics community.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"136 ","pages":"Article 105055"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1120179725001656","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Optimization and quality control of the diagnostic and interventional radiology procedures is usually performed with an X-ray multimeter (XMM) based on the non-invasive measurements of different X-ray tube and output parameters obtained from the X-ray beam, such as air kerma, tube voltage and half-value layer. Standardization and metrological support need to be improved, and harmonized calibration procedures are not available for all quantities. There is also a lack of data on performance of XMMs in different measurement conditions relevant for clinical practice.
Methods
The needs for calibration of XMMs and current state of the art of calibration services were investigated by performing an overview of the standards, conducting surveys addressed to the clinical medical physicists and calibration laboratories and investigating the key comparison database.
Results
There are widely available calibration services for air kerma measurements for a large range of radiation qualities. However, there is a lack of calibration services for all other measured quantities, and very few laboratories besides the manufacturers are able to perform these calibrations. In addition, standardization gaps with non-harmonized calibration and measurement procedures for these quantities were found.
Conclusion
New calibration services with harmonized procedures are needed for XMMs, especially for quantities beyond air kerma. There is a need to better understand and reduce measurement uncertainty for some quantities. New procedures will be developed within the TraMeXI project and disseminated to the standardization bodies, metrology and medical physics community.
期刊介绍:
Physica Medica, European Journal of Medical Physics, publishing with Elsevier from 2007, provides an international forum for research and reviews on the following main topics:
Medical Imaging
Radiation Therapy
Radiation Protection
Measuring Systems and Signal Processing
Education and training in Medical Physics
Professional issues in Medical Physics.