An EIT-based assessment of regional ventilation delay under incremental PEEP: Influence of sex, smoking, vaping, asthma, and BMI

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Rongqing Chen , Ella F.S. Guy , Jaimey A. Clifton , J. Geoffrey Chase , Stefan J. Rupitsch , Knut Moeller
{"title":"An EIT-based assessment of regional ventilation delay under incremental PEEP: Influence of sex, smoking, vaping, asthma, and BMI","authors":"Rongqing Chen ,&nbsp;Ella F.S. Guy ,&nbsp;Jaimey A. Clifton ,&nbsp;J. Geoffrey Chase ,&nbsp;Stefan J. Rupitsch ,&nbsp;Knut Moeller","doi":"10.1016/j.cmpb.2025.108992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Objective</h3><div>Therapies such as positive airway pressure (PAP), which maintain positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) settings, are widely used in the management of respiratory diseases. However, most research has focused on patient outcomes, such as oxygenation, mortality rates, or ventilator-free days. There is a lack of focus on lung-specific responses, for example, atelectasis rate or aeration heterogeneities. This study aims to use Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) to investigate variations in lung aeration heterogeneity with increasing PEEP and how factors such as sex, smoking/vaping history, asthma, and BMI influence lung aeration dynamics.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eighty participants were recruited and categorized into four groups: asthmatics, smokers, vapers, and healthy individuals. Each group comprises 20 subjects evenly distributed by sex (10 females and 10 males). Varying PEEP was applied on each subject during the trial, which began at zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) and subsequently increased from 4 to 12 cmH<sub>2</sub>O on non-invasive ventilation (NIV). EIT data were collected at each pressure level. Lung aeration heterogeneity was assessed using regional ventilation delay (RVD), a promising metric derived from EIT data for evaluating lung-specific responses to mechanical ventilation. RVD and its standard deviation (SDRVD) of each subject were calculated accordingly at ZEEP and the highest PEEP level.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Results demonstrated that female participants exhibited a significant increase in RVD when pressure was elevated from ZEEP to higher levels, whereas male participants showed no such significant change. Overweight subjects experienced no significant alterations in RVD under highest PEEP, whereas non-overweight subjects showed significantly increased RVD under higher pressure levels. Vaping was associated with a statistically significant increase in RVD when pressure was at the highest PEEP level, whereas no significant RVD changes were observed among smokers or subjects with mild asthma within this relatively young population.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings emphasize the importance of considering individualized factors when optimizing respiratory therapy, including sex and BMI. These factors significantly influence regional lung aeration and ventilation dynamics, and play important roles in optimising mechanical ventilation settings, which could potentially enhance therapeutic effectiveness and patient outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10624,"journal":{"name":"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine","volume":"271 ","pages":"Article 108992"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169260725004092","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objective

Therapies such as positive airway pressure (PAP), which maintain positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) settings, are widely used in the management of respiratory diseases. However, most research has focused on patient outcomes, such as oxygenation, mortality rates, or ventilator-free days. There is a lack of focus on lung-specific responses, for example, atelectasis rate or aeration heterogeneities. This study aims to use Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) to investigate variations in lung aeration heterogeneity with increasing PEEP and how factors such as sex, smoking/vaping history, asthma, and BMI influence lung aeration dynamics.

Methods

Eighty participants were recruited and categorized into four groups: asthmatics, smokers, vapers, and healthy individuals. Each group comprises 20 subjects evenly distributed by sex (10 females and 10 males). Varying PEEP was applied on each subject during the trial, which began at zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) and subsequently increased from 4 to 12 cmH2O on non-invasive ventilation (NIV). EIT data were collected at each pressure level. Lung aeration heterogeneity was assessed using regional ventilation delay (RVD), a promising metric derived from EIT data for evaluating lung-specific responses to mechanical ventilation. RVD and its standard deviation (SDRVD) of each subject were calculated accordingly at ZEEP and the highest PEEP level.

Results

Results demonstrated that female participants exhibited a significant increase in RVD when pressure was elevated from ZEEP to higher levels, whereas male participants showed no such significant change. Overweight subjects experienced no significant alterations in RVD under highest PEEP, whereas non-overweight subjects showed significantly increased RVD under higher pressure levels. Vaping was associated with a statistically significant increase in RVD when pressure was at the highest PEEP level, whereas no significant RVD changes were observed among smokers or subjects with mild asthma within this relatively young population.

Conclusions

These findings emphasize the importance of considering individualized factors when optimizing respiratory therapy, including sex and BMI. These factors significantly influence regional lung aeration and ventilation dynamics, and play important roles in optimising mechanical ventilation settings, which could potentially enhance therapeutic effectiveness and patient outcomes.
基于eit的增量PEEP下局部通气延迟评估:性别、吸烟、吸电子烟、哮喘和BMI的影响
背景与目的维持呼气末正压(PEEP)的气道正压(PAP)等治疗方法被广泛应用于呼吸系统疾病的治疗。然而,大多数研究都集中在患者的结果上,如氧合、死亡率或无呼吸机天数。缺乏对肺特异性反应的关注,例如肺不张率或通气不均匀性。本研究旨在利用电阻抗断层扫描(EIT)研究肺通气异质性随PEEP升高的变化,以及性别、吸烟/电子烟史、哮喘和BMI等因素对肺通气动力学的影响。方法招募80名参与者,将其分为四组:哮喘患者、吸烟者、电子烟使用者和健康人。每组由20名受试者组成,按性别均匀分布(男女各10名)。在试验期间,每位受试者使用不同的PEEP,从零呼气末压(ZEEP)开始,随后在无创通气(NIV)下从4 cmH2O增加到12 cmH2O。在每个压力水平下收集EIT数据。使用区域通气延迟(RVD)评估肺通气异质性,RVD是一种来自EIT数据的有希望的指标,用于评估肺对机械通气的特异性反应。计算受试者在ZEEP和最高PEEP水平下的RVD及其标准差(SDRVD)。结果表明,当压力从ZEEP升高到更高水平时,女性参与者的RVD显著增加,而男性参与者则没有这种显著变化。在最高PEEP下,超重受试者的RVD无显著变化,而非超重受试者在较高压力水平下RVD显著增加。当压力处于最高PEEP水平时,电子烟与RVD的统计学显著增加相关,而在相对年轻的人群中,吸烟者或轻度哮喘患者的RVD没有显著变化。结论这些发现强调了在优化呼吸治疗时考虑个体化因素的重要性,包括性别和BMI。这些因素显著影响局部肺通气和通气动力学,并在优化机械通气设置中发挥重要作用,这可能潜在地提高治疗效果和患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computer methods and programs in biomedicine
Computer methods and programs in biomedicine 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
6.60%
发文量
601
审稿时长
135 days
期刊介绍: To encourage the development of formal computing methods, and their application in biomedical research and medical practice, by illustration of fundamental principles in biomedical informatics research; to stimulate basic research into application software design; to report the state of research of biomedical information processing projects; to report new computer methodologies applied in biomedical areas; the eventual distribution of demonstrable software to avoid duplication of effort; to provide a forum for discussion and improvement of existing software; to optimize contact between national organizations and regional user groups by promoting an international exchange of information on formal methods, standards and software in biomedicine. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine covers computing methodology and software systems derived from computing science for implementation in all aspects of biomedical research and medical practice. It is designed to serve: biochemists; biologists; geneticists; immunologists; neuroscientists; pharmacologists; toxicologists; clinicians; epidemiologists; psychiatrists; psychologists; cardiologists; chemists; (radio)physicists; computer scientists; programmers and systems analysts; biomedical, clinical, electrical and other engineers; teachers of medical informatics and users of educational software.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信