Reflexiones y experiencias de la realización de una encuesta europea con relación a las prácticas clínicas sobre dispositivos de acceso vascular para terapia sistémica contra el cáncer

IF 1.1 Q4 NURSING
Caitriona Duggan , Martha Killilea , Veronica McInerney , Onagh O’Grady , Jacqueline Daly , Aoife Lowery
{"title":"Reflexiones y experiencias de la realización de una encuesta europea con relación a las prácticas clínicas sobre dispositivos de acceso vascular para terapia sistémica contra el cáncer","authors":"Caitriona Duggan ,&nbsp;Martha Killilea ,&nbsp;Veronica McInerney ,&nbsp;Onagh O’Grady ,&nbsp;Jacqueline Daly ,&nbsp;Aoife Lowery","doi":"10.1016/j.enfcli.2025.502248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Intravenous infusion is the principal way of providing systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) for the vast majority of malignant diseases with approximately one million infusions conducted worldwide each day. A recent scoping review discovered a significant deficit in the literature covering clinical aspects of vascular access device (VAD) selection, insertion, and, in particular, training and education. To answer some of these questions, we are conducting a quantitative survey throughout Europe to investigate healthcare professionals’ current practices surrounding vascular access devices used for systemic anti-cancer therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This methods paper describes the actions that a research team studying vascular access took to carry out a comprehensive survey across Europe. The purpose of this paper is to share some reflections regarding the survey design. It also covers the steps involved in creating a high-quality questionnaire, the extent, quality, and impact of Public Patient Involvement (PPI) in survey design, the methodologies used to measure the questionnaire's face and content validity, and the experiences gained about stakeholder engagement and dissemination.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This paper summarizes some of the findings acquired from integrating and interacting with PPI during different stages of clinical research. It also provides practical tactics for managing a large global team of collaborators, as well as an explanation of the many methodologies used to increase the survey's validity and accuracy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46453,"journal":{"name":"Enfermeria Clinica","volume":"35 4","pages":"Article 502248"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermeria Clinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130862125000609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Intravenous infusion is the principal way of providing systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) for the vast majority of malignant diseases with approximately one million infusions conducted worldwide each day. A recent scoping review discovered a significant deficit in the literature covering clinical aspects of vascular access device (VAD) selection, insertion, and, in particular, training and education. To answer some of these questions, we are conducting a quantitative survey throughout Europe to investigate healthcare professionals’ current practices surrounding vascular access devices used for systemic anti-cancer therapy.

Methods

This methods paper describes the actions that a research team studying vascular access took to carry out a comprehensive survey across Europe. The purpose of this paper is to share some reflections regarding the survey design. It also covers the steps involved in creating a high-quality questionnaire, the extent, quality, and impact of Public Patient Involvement (PPI) in survey design, the methodologies used to measure the questionnaire's face and content validity, and the experiences gained about stakeholder engagement and dissemination.

Conclusion

This paper summarizes some of the findings acquired from integrating and interacting with PPI during different stages of clinical research. It also provides practical tactics for managing a large global team of collaborators, as well as an explanation of the many methodologies used to increase the survey's validity and accuracy.
关于全欧洲血管通路癌症治疗装置临床实践调查的反思和经验
背景静脉输注是为绝大多数恶性疾病提供全身抗癌治疗(SACT)的主要方式,全世界每天大约进行100万次静脉输注。最近的一项范围审查发现,在涉及血管通路装置(VAD)的选择、插入,特别是培训和教育的临床方面的文献中存在重大缺陷。为了回答其中的一些问题,我们正在整个欧洲进行一项定量调查,调查医疗保健专业人员目前在用于全身抗癌治疗的血管通路装置方面的做法。方法本文描述了一个研究血管通路的研究小组在整个欧洲开展的一项全面调查。本文的目的是分享一些关于调查设计的思考。它还涵盖了创建高质量问卷所涉及的步骤,公众患者参与(PPI)在调查设计中的程度、质量和影响,用于测量问卷外观和内容有效性的方法,以及在利益相关者参与和传播方面获得的经验。结论总结了在不同临床研究阶段与PPI结合及相互作用的一些发现。它还提供了管理大型全球合作者团队的实用策略,以及用于提高调查有效性和准确性的许多方法的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Enfermería Clínica is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is a useful and necessary tool for nursing professionals from the different areas of nursing (healthcare, administration, education and research) as well as for healthcare professionals involved in caring for persons, families and the community. It is the only Spanish nursing journal that mainly publishes original research. The aim of the Journal is to promote increased knowledge through the publication of original research and other studies that may help nursing professionals improve their daily practice. This objective is pursued throughout the different sections that comprise the Journal: Original Articles and Short Original Articles, Special Articles, Patient Care and Letters to the Editor. There is also an Evidence-Based Nursing section that includes comments about original articles of special interest written by experts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信