Exploring priority areas to establish quality improvement education partnerships: A nominal group technique study

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Verity Mak, Gabrielle Brand, Nicole Kovach, Julia Morphet
{"title":"Exploring priority areas to establish quality improvement education partnerships: A nominal group technique study","authors":"Verity Mak,&nbsp;Gabrielle Brand,&nbsp;Nicole Kovach,&nbsp;Julia Morphet","doi":"10.1016/j.profnurs.2025.07.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Quality improvement partnerships between higher education and healthcare organizations are emerging as a valuable way to engage pre-licensure nursing students in this content. There are no agreed guidelines to assist with the establishment of these partnerships.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To convene key stakeholders with the objective of reaching consensus on the following question: What needs to happen to establish quality improvement education partnerships between higher education and healthcare organizations?</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A nominal group technique was used, adhering to the STROBE guidelines. Participants generated ideas to answer the question individually before sharing and discussing them within the group. Participants then independently voted and ranked the ideas in order of priority to reach consensus.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-nine ideas were generated during the nominal group technique meeting by the five participants. A consensus was reached on ten priority areas required to establish quality improvement education partnerships.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These priority areas can be used as a starting point for the establishment of quality improvement education partnerships for pre-licensure nursing students. The results can be used internationally to guide pre-licensure nursing and health professions academics towards the inclusion of quality improvement education partnerships in curricula to develop quality improvement knowledge and skills of students which they can apply on entering the workforce.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Professional Nursing","volume":"60 ","pages":"Pages 101-106"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Professional Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755722325001127","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Quality improvement partnerships between higher education and healthcare organizations are emerging as a valuable way to engage pre-licensure nursing students in this content. There are no agreed guidelines to assist with the establishment of these partnerships.

Aim

To convene key stakeholders with the objective of reaching consensus on the following question: What needs to happen to establish quality improvement education partnerships between higher education and healthcare organizations?

Methods

A nominal group technique was used, adhering to the STROBE guidelines. Participants generated ideas to answer the question individually before sharing and discussing them within the group. Participants then independently voted and ranked the ideas in order of priority to reach consensus.

Results

Thirty-nine ideas were generated during the nominal group technique meeting by the five participants. A consensus was reached on ten priority areas required to establish quality improvement education partnerships.

Conclusion

These priority areas can be used as a starting point for the establishment of quality improvement education partnerships for pre-licensure nursing students. The results can be used internationally to guide pre-licensure nursing and health professions academics towards the inclusion of quality improvement education partnerships in curricula to develop quality improvement knowledge and skills of students which they can apply on entering the workforce.
探索建立质量改善教育伙伴关系的优先领域:一项名义团体技术研究
高等教育和医疗保健组织之间的质量改进伙伴关系正在成为一种有价值的方式,可以让获得执照的护理学生参与到这一内容中来。没有商定的指导方针来协助建立这些伙伴关系。目的召集主要利益相关者,就以下问题达成共识:在高等教育和医疗保健组织之间建立质量改进教育伙伴关系需要做些什么?方法采用名义分组技术,遵循STROBE指南。在小组内分享和讨论之前,参与者各自提出回答问题的想法。然后,参与者独立投票,并按照优先顺序对这些想法进行排序,以达成共识。结果5名参与者在名义小组技术会议上共提出39个想法。会议就建立提高教育质素伙伴关系所需的十个优先范畴达成共识。结论这些重点领域可作为建立护生素质提升教育伙伴关系的起点。研究结果可在国际上用于指导获得执照前的护理和卫生专业学者在课程中纳入质量改进教育伙伴关系,以培养学生在进入劳动力市场时可以应用的质量改进知识和技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The Journal will accept articles that focus on baccalaureate and higher degree nursing education, educational research, policy related to education, and education and practice partnerships. Reports of original work, research, reviews, insightful descriptions, and policy papers focusing on baccalaureate and graduate nursing education will be published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信