Can contaminated musculoskeletal autografts and allografts Be safely and effectively used in Patients? A systematic review

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Patrick Ryan , Bryce W. Rigden , Clayton W. Nuelle , James P. Stannard , Steven F. DeFroda , James L. Cook
{"title":"Can contaminated musculoskeletal autografts and allografts Be safely and effectively used in Patients? A systematic review","authors":"Patrick Ryan ,&nbsp;Bryce W. Rigden ,&nbsp;Clayton W. Nuelle ,&nbsp;James P. Stannard ,&nbsp;Steven F. DeFroda ,&nbsp;James L. Cook","doi":"10.1016/j.jor.2025.07.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Musculoskeletal autografts and allografts are used frequently in orthopaedics, and contamination of the grafts can occur. When intraoperative contamination is recognized, the graft can be salvaged for use and postoperative complications minimized with effective decontamination. The purpose of this systematic review was to critically evaluate safety and efficacy of decontamination protocols for tendon, meniscus, and osteochondral grafts in order to provide evidence-based guidelines for graft salvage.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using PRISMA guidelines, a literature search was performed to identify eligible studies for systematic review of tendon-ligament, osteochondral, and meniscal graft decontamination protocols. Separate searches for tendon, for ligament (tendon-ligament), osteochondral, and meniscal protocols were performed using keywords: (1) “operative”, (2) “dropped OR contamination OR sterilization”, and (3a) “tendon” or (3b) “ligament” or (3c) “osteochondral” or (3d) “meniscus”.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 16 studies for tendon-ligament and 6 studies for osteochondral grafts met inclusion criteria. For all graft types, dropping the tissue onto the operating room floor is the most commonly reported method of contamination. The most common decontaminants used were 10 % povidone-iodine and 4 % chlorhexidine with the typical soaking time being 10 min. For both tissue types, chlorhexidine-based protocols were most consistently effective at eradicating bacterial contaminants. Clinical outcome measures were limited to assessments of subsequent infections with none reported in the very few studies that provided outcome data.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The currently available evidence for intraoperative decontamination of musculoskeletal autografts and allografts supports the use of chlorhexidine-based soaking protocols for treatment of tendon autografts and allografts, as well as fresh (viable) osteochondral allografts, in order to most effectively prevent related infections. Additional data is required to determine optimal protocols with respect to disinfectant types and concentrations, inclusion of antibiotics, exposure durations, and use of “mechanical agitation” that sufficiently eradicate pathogens and preserve essential cell viability, material properties, and biocompatibility for each tissue type in order to prevent tissue waste, morbidity, complications, failures, and associated costs while promoting successful outcomes for patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orthopaedics","volume":"68 ","pages":"Pages 238-250"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972978X25002910","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Musculoskeletal autografts and allografts are used frequently in orthopaedics, and contamination of the grafts can occur. When intraoperative contamination is recognized, the graft can be salvaged for use and postoperative complications minimized with effective decontamination. The purpose of this systematic review was to critically evaluate safety and efficacy of decontamination protocols for tendon, meniscus, and osteochondral grafts in order to provide evidence-based guidelines for graft salvage.

Methods

Using PRISMA guidelines, a literature search was performed to identify eligible studies for systematic review of tendon-ligament, osteochondral, and meniscal graft decontamination protocols. Separate searches for tendon, for ligament (tendon-ligament), osteochondral, and meniscal protocols were performed using keywords: (1) “operative”, (2) “dropped OR contamination OR sterilization”, and (3a) “tendon” or (3b) “ligament” or (3c) “osteochondral” or (3d) “meniscus”.

Results

A total of 16 studies for tendon-ligament and 6 studies for osteochondral grafts met inclusion criteria. For all graft types, dropping the tissue onto the operating room floor is the most commonly reported method of contamination. The most common decontaminants used were 10 % povidone-iodine and 4 % chlorhexidine with the typical soaking time being 10 min. For both tissue types, chlorhexidine-based protocols were most consistently effective at eradicating bacterial contaminants. Clinical outcome measures were limited to assessments of subsequent infections with none reported in the very few studies that provided outcome data.

Conclusion

The currently available evidence for intraoperative decontamination of musculoskeletal autografts and allografts supports the use of chlorhexidine-based soaking protocols for treatment of tendon autografts and allografts, as well as fresh (viable) osteochondral allografts, in order to most effectively prevent related infections. Additional data is required to determine optimal protocols with respect to disinfectant types and concentrations, inclusion of antibiotics, exposure durations, and use of “mechanical agitation” that sufficiently eradicate pathogens and preserve essential cell viability, material properties, and biocompatibility for each tissue type in order to prevent tissue waste, morbidity, complications, failures, and associated costs while promoting successful outcomes for patients.
受污染的自体肌肉骨骼移植物和同种异体移植物能安全有效地用于患者吗?系统回顾
背景:自体肌肉骨骼移植和同种异体肌肉骨骼移植在骨科中经常使用,移植物可能会受到污染。当识别出术中污染时,可以挽救移植物用于使用,并通过有效的去污将术后并发症降到最低。本系统综述的目的是严格评估肌腱、半月板和骨软骨移植物去污方案的安全性和有效性,以便为移植物修复提供循证指南。方法采用PRISMA指南,进行文献检索,以确定符合条件的研究,对肌腱韧带、骨软骨和半月板移植物去污方案进行系统评价。使用关键词分别搜索肌腱、韧带(肌腱-韧带)、骨软骨和半月板方案:(1)“手术”,(2)“丢弃或污染或灭菌”,(3a)“肌腱”或(3b)“韧带”或(3c)“骨软骨”或(3d)“半月板”。结果16项肌腱韧带移植研究和6项骨软骨移植研究符合纳入标准。对于所有移植类型,将组织掉落到手术室地板上是最常见的污染方法。最常用的去污剂是10%聚维酮碘和4%洗必泰,典型的浸泡时间为10分钟。对于两种组织类型,以洗必泰为基础的方案在根除细菌污染物方面最有效。临床结果测量仅限于对后续感染的评估,在极少数提供结果数据的研究中没有报道。结论目前已有的自体骨肌移植和同种异体移植物术中消毒的证据支持使用基于氯己定的浸泡方案治疗自体肌腱移植物和同种异体移植物,以及新鲜(活的)同种骨软骨移植物,以最有效地预防相关感染。需要额外的数据来确定最佳方案,包括消毒剂类型和浓度、抗生素的纳入、暴露时间和“机械搅拌”的使用,以充分根除病原体并保持基本的细胞活力、材料特性和每种组织类型的生物相容性,以防止组织浪费、发病率、并发症、失败和相关成本,同时促进患者的成功结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
202
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedics aims to be a leading journal in orthopaedics and contribute towards the improvement of quality of orthopedic health care. The journal publishes original research work and review articles related to different aspects of orthopaedics including Arthroplasty, Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, Trauma, Spine and Spinal deformities, Pediatric orthopaedics, limb reconstruction procedures, hand surgery, and orthopaedic oncology. It also publishes articles on continuing education, health-related information, case reports and letters to the editor. It is requested to note that the journal has an international readership and all submissions should be aimed at specifying something about the setting in which the work was conducted. Authors must also provide any specific reasons for the research and also provide an elaborate description of the results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信