Centrifuge modeling on the geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) abutments with different combinations of reinforcement spacing and tensile stiffness

IF 6.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Qingming Wang , Chao Xu , Geye Li , Panpan Shen , Chongxi Zhao
{"title":"Centrifuge modeling on the geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) abutments with different combinations of reinforcement spacing and tensile stiffness","authors":"Qingming Wang ,&nbsp;Chao Xu ,&nbsp;Geye Li ,&nbsp;Panpan Shen ,&nbsp;Chongxi Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.geotexmem.2025.07.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Three centrifuge model tests were conducted to investigate the performance of geosynthetic reinforced soil (GRS) abutments with modular block facing under localized vertical loads. This study examined the effects of different combinations of reinforcement spacing <em>S</em><sub><em>v</em></sub> and tensile stiffness <em>J</em> on the behavior of GRS abutments. In this study, river sand and woven geotextiles were used as the backfill soil and reinforcement material, respectively. Test results show that under the same ratio of <em>J</em>/<em>S</em><sub><em>v</em></sub> = 3.7, using the combination of smaller <em>S</em><sub><em>v</em></sub> and lower <em>J</em> was more effective in minimizing the beam seat settlements and the lateral facing displacements induced by localized vertical loads than the combination of larger <em>S</em><sub><em>v</em></sub> and higher <em>J</em>. Meanwhile, smaller additional vertical stresses transferred from the applied loads within the GRS abutment and smaller reinforcement tensile forces were also observed for the combination of smaller <em>S</em><sub><em>v</em></sub> and lower <em>J</em>. Furthermore, the maximum tensile forces in each layer occurred under the beam seat for the upper reinforcement layers and near the facing for the lower layers for all three tests. A more uniform distribution of the reinforcement tensile force was found for the combination of smaller <em>S</em><sub><em>v</em></sub> and lower <em>J</em>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55096,"journal":{"name":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","volume":"53 6","pages":"Pages 1473-1482"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266114425000925","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Three centrifuge model tests were conducted to investigate the performance of geosynthetic reinforced soil (GRS) abutments with modular block facing under localized vertical loads. This study examined the effects of different combinations of reinforcement spacing Sv and tensile stiffness J on the behavior of GRS abutments. In this study, river sand and woven geotextiles were used as the backfill soil and reinforcement material, respectively. Test results show that under the same ratio of J/Sv = 3.7, using the combination of smaller Sv and lower J was more effective in minimizing the beam seat settlements and the lateral facing displacements induced by localized vertical loads than the combination of larger Sv and higher J. Meanwhile, smaller additional vertical stresses transferred from the applied loads within the GRS abutment and smaller reinforcement tensile forces were also observed for the combination of smaller Sv and lower J. Furthermore, the maximum tensile forces in each layer occurred under the beam seat for the upper reinforcement layers and near the facing for the lower layers for all three tests. A more uniform distribution of the reinforcement tensile force was found for the combination of smaller Sv and lower J.
土工合成加筋土(GRS)桥台不同配筋间距和抗拉刚度组合的离心模拟
采用离心模型试验方法,研究了组合式砌块土工合成加筋土桥台在局部竖向荷载作用下的性能。研究了不同配筋间距Sv和抗拉刚度J组合对GRS基台性能的影响。本研究采用河砂作为回填土,采用编织土工布作为加固材料。试验结果表明,在相同J/Sv = 3.7的情况下,较小Sv和较低J的组合比较大Sv和较高J的组合更能有效地减小梁座沉降和局部竖向荷载引起的侧向位移。在较小的Sv和较低的j值组合下,GRS桥台内附加荷载传递的附加垂直应力较小,钢筋拉力较小。此外,在所有三种试验中,每一层的最大拉力都出现在上层钢筋层的梁座下方,下层钢筋层的面板附近。较小的Sv和较低的J组合使钢筋受拉力分布更为均匀。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geotextiles and Geomembranes
Geotextiles and Geomembranes 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
21.20%
发文量
111
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The range of products and their applications has expanded rapidly over the last decade with geotextiles and geomembranes being specified world wide. This rapid growth is paralleled by a virtual explosion of technology. Current reference books and even manufacturers' sponsored publications tend to date very quickly and the need for a vehicle to bring together and discuss the growing body of technology now available has become evident. Geotextiles and Geomembranes fills this need and provides a forum for the dissemination of information amongst research workers, designers, users and manufacturers. By providing a growing fund of information the journal increases general awareness, prompts further research and assists in the establishment of international codes and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信