Elevated lung cancer screening needs among emergency department patients

Beau Abar, George Ashji, David Adler
{"title":"Elevated lung cancer screening needs among emergency department patients","authors":"Beau Abar,&nbsp;George Ashji,&nbsp;David Adler","doi":"10.1016/j.jemrpt.2025.100188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>More than 10 % of Emergency Department (ED) cancer-related visits are for lung cancer<strong>.</strong> Timely lung cancer screening is an effective mechanism to decrease lung cancer morbidity and mortality, but only 16 % of eligible patients in the general population are up-to-date with lung cancer screening recommendations. Furthermore, many characteristics found predictive of non-adherence with screening are over-represented within the ED patient population.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The goal of this study is to determine risk for non-adherence with USPSTF lung cancer screening guidelines among the ED patient population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data on smoking history and lung cancer screening were abstracted from the medical charts of patients 50–80 years old presenting to the University of Rochester Medical Center ED during 2023. Adherence with guidelines among eligible patients was determined by documentation of lung cancer screening in the year prior to ED presentation. We also evaluated any screening that occurred within 120 days of their ED visit.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 559 patient charts were reviewed, with 354 having a documented history of tobacco use (63 %). Pack year estimates were available for 252 patients, and 116 patients had a 20+ pack year smoking history documented (e.g., eligible for lung cancer screening). Among those, 14 individuals received LCS in the past year, representing a screening adherence rate of 12 % at presentation. By 120 days post-visit, the rate declined to 9 %.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ED patients are at elevated risk for non-adherence with LCS guidelines, supporting previous work that demonstrates the potential value of ED-based intervention efforts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73546,"journal":{"name":"JEM reports","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JEM reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773232025000525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

More than 10 % of Emergency Department (ED) cancer-related visits are for lung cancer. Timely lung cancer screening is an effective mechanism to decrease lung cancer morbidity and mortality, but only 16 % of eligible patients in the general population are up-to-date with lung cancer screening recommendations. Furthermore, many characteristics found predictive of non-adherence with screening are over-represented within the ED patient population.

Objective

The goal of this study is to determine risk for non-adherence with USPSTF lung cancer screening guidelines among the ED patient population.

Methods

Data on smoking history and lung cancer screening were abstracted from the medical charts of patients 50–80 years old presenting to the University of Rochester Medical Center ED during 2023. Adherence with guidelines among eligible patients was determined by documentation of lung cancer screening in the year prior to ED presentation. We also evaluated any screening that occurred within 120 days of their ED visit.

Results

A total of 559 patient charts were reviewed, with 354 having a documented history of tobacco use (63 %). Pack year estimates were available for 252 patients, and 116 patients had a 20+ pack year smoking history documented (e.g., eligible for lung cancer screening). Among those, 14 individuals received LCS in the past year, representing a screening adherence rate of 12 % at presentation. By 120 days post-visit, the rate declined to 9 %.

Conclusion

ED patients are at elevated risk for non-adherence with LCS guidelines, supporting previous work that demonstrates the potential value of ED-based intervention efforts.
急诊科患者肺癌筛查需求增加
背景:超过10%的急诊科(ED)癌症相关就诊是针对肺癌。及时的肺癌筛查是降低肺癌发病率和死亡率的有效机制,但在普通人群中,只有16%的符合条件的患者接受了最新的肺癌筛查建议。此外,在ED患者群体中,发现许多预测筛查不依从性的特征被过度代表。目的本研究的目的是确定ED患者人群中不遵守USPSTF肺癌筛查指南的风险。方法从罗彻斯特大学医学中心急诊部2023年就诊的50 ~ 80岁患者病历中提取吸烟史和肺癌筛查资料。符合条件的患者是否遵守指南是通过ED出现前一年的肺癌筛查记录来确定的。我们还评估了他们在急诊室就诊后120天内进行的任何筛查。结果共审查559例患者病历,其中354例(63%)有烟草使用史。252名患者可获得包年估计,116名患者有超过20包年的吸烟史记录(例如,符合肺癌筛查条件)。其中,14人在过去的一年中接受了LCS,代表了12%的筛查依从率。到120天后,这一比例降至9%。结论:患者不遵守LCS指南的风险较高,支持先前的研究,证明了基于ed的干预措施的潜在价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JEM reports
JEM reports Emergency Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
54 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信