Vasopressin and its analogues in patients with septic shock: holy Grail or unfulfilled promise?

IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Quentin Lajoye, Arthur Orieux, Alexandre Boyer, Renaud Prevel, Mathieu Jozwiak
{"title":"Vasopressin and its analogues in patients with septic shock: holy Grail or unfulfilled promise?","authors":"Quentin Lajoye, Arthur Orieux, Alexandre Boyer, Renaud Prevel, Mathieu Jozwiak","doi":"10.1186/s13054-025-05540-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) recommends norepinephrine as first-line vasopressor in patients with septic shock. For many years, there has been growing evidence that high doses of norepinephrine might have cardiac and immunological adverse effects and be associated with poorer outcomes. Current SSC guidelines therefore suggest adding vasopressin, a non-catecholaminergic vasopressor, as a second-line vasopressor rather than increasing the norepinephrine dose in patients requiring doses of norepinephrine base > 0.25–0.50 µg/kg/min, after excluding persistent hypovolemia and cardiac dysfunction. Vasopressin is a peptide hormone that causes vasoconstriction through its specific receptor, the arginine vasopressin receptor V1. Up to one-third of patients with septic shock may have vasopressin deficiency, which contributes to refractory septic shock. Vasopressin use is associated with a norepinephrine-sparing effect, which may in turn reduce the complications induced by high-doses of norepinephrine, by decreasing the vasopressor load: this is the concept of decatecholaminization. Nevertheless, the use of vasopressin in patients with septic shock has not yet demonstrated clear benefits in terms of patient outcomes, such as less cardiotoxicity, reduced use of renal replacement therapy or decreased mortality. The heterogeneity in the use of vasopressin and the definition of early vasopressin administration between different studies as well as many unresolved issues regarding the use of vasopressin in patients with septic shock could explain the absence of clear and relevant clinical benefits. Thus, the identification of subgroups of patients likely to benefit the most from vasopressin, the management of vasopressin administration (time to initiation, optimal doses, weaning strategy) and a better understanding of the interactions between vasopressin and corticosteroids represent major areas of research for future studies. ","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05540-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) recommends norepinephrine as first-line vasopressor in patients with septic shock. For many years, there has been growing evidence that high doses of norepinephrine might have cardiac and immunological adverse effects and be associated with poorer outcomes. Current SSC guidelines therefore suggest adding vasopressin, a non-catecholaminergic vasopressor, as a second-line vasopressor rather than increasing the norepinephrine dose in patients requiring doses of norepinephrine base > 0.25–0.50 µg/kg/min, after excluding persistent hypovolemia and cardiac dysfunction. Vasopressin is a peptide hormone that causes vasoconstriction through its specific receptor, the arginine vasopressin receptor V1. Up to one-third of patients with septic shock may have vasopressin deficiency, which contributes to refractory septic shock. Vasopressin use is associated with a norepinephrine-sparing effect, which may in turn reduce the complications induced by high-doses of norepinephrine, by decreasing the vasopressor load: this is the concept of decatecholaminization. Nevertheless, the use of vasopressin in patients with septic shock has not yet demonstrated clear benefits in terms of patient outcomes, such as less cardiotoxicity, reduced use of renal replacement therapy or decreased mortality. The heterogeneity in the use of vasopressin and the definition of early vasopressin administration between different studies as well as many unresolved issues regarding the use of vasopressin in patients with septic shock could explain the absence of clear and relevant clinical benefits. Thus, the identification of subgroups of patients likely to benefit the most from vasopressin, the management of vasopressin administration (time to initiation, optimal doses, weaning strategy) and a better understanding of the interactions between vasopressin and corticosteroids represent major areas of research for future studies.
抗利尿激素及其类似物在脓毒性休克患者中的应用:圣杯还是未实现的希望?
脓毒症生存运动(SSC)推荐去甲肾上腺素作为脓毒症休克患者的一线血管加压药。多年来,越来越多的证据表明,高剂量的去甲肾上腺素可能对心脏和免疫系统产生不良影响,并与较差的预后有关。因此,目前的SSC指南建议在排除持续性低血容量和心功能障碍后,在需要去甲肾上腺素基础剂量>.25 - 0.50µg/kg/min的患者中,添加抗利尿激素(一种非儿茶酚胺能血管加压素)作为二线血管加压剂,而不是增加去甲肾上腺素的剂量。抗利尿激素是一种肽激素,通过其特定受体精氨酸抗利尿激素受体V1引起血管收缩。高达三分之一的脓毒性休克患者可能存在抗利尿激素缺乏,这导致难治性脓毒性休克。抗利尿激素的使用与去甲肾上腺素节约效应有关,通过降低抗利尿激素负荷,去甲肾上腺素的使用可以减少由高剂量去甲肾上腺素引起的并发症:这就是十儿茶胺化的概念。然而,在脓毒性休克患者中使用抗利尿激素在患者预后方面尚未显示出明显的益处,例如减少心脏毒性,减少肾脏替代治疗的使用或降低死亡率。抗利尿激素使用的异质性和不同研究之间抗利尿激素早期给药的定义,以及关于在感染性休克患者中使用抗利尿激素的许多未解决的问题,可以解释缺乏明确和相关的临床益处。因此,确定可能从抗利尿激素中获益最多的患者亚组,抗利尿激素给药的管理(起始时间,最佳剂量,断奶策略)以及更好地了解抗利尿激素和皮质类固醇之间的相互作用是未来研究的主要研究领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care
Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
20.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
348
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care is an esteemed international medical journal that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain its high quality standards. Its primary objective is to enhance the healthcare services offered to critically ill patients. To achieve this, the journal focuses on gathering, exchanging, disseminating, and endorsing evidence-based information that is highly relevant to intensivists. By doing so, Critical Care seeks to provide a thorough and inclusive examination of the intensive care field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信