{"title":"Optical gaps of F-center defects in LiF using many-body methods","authors":"Ritaj Tyagi, Abhisek Ghosal, Vamsee K Voora","doi":"10.1039/d5cp02179k","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<em>F</em>-center defects, occuring in technologically important wide-bandgap solids, influence the properties of the parent material. Their experimental characterization can be challenging due to low concentrations and spectral broadening. Modeling of these defects poses computational challenges due to their aperiodic nature, lattice distortion effects, and the need to describe many-body polarization effects induced by the surrounding environment. Here, we study bulk and surface <em>F</em>-center defects in LiF by combining random phase approximation (RPA) based potentials with periodic electrostatic embedding. We evaluate the accuracy of computationally efficient potentials such as single-pole exchange-correlation (1p-XC) and static-Coulomb hole screened exchange (st-COHSEX), and find the former to be suitable for bulk and surface <em>F</em>-center defects. For the commonly studied case of bulk <em>F</em>-centers, the 1p-XC approach predicts an optical gap (Δ<small><sub>og</sub></small>) of 5.24 eV, closely matching high-level quantum chemistry methods like CASPT2 (Δ<small><sub>og</sub></small>=5.31 eV) and within 0.16 eV of experimental absorption maximum. For surface <em>F</em>-centers, which are largely unexplored, we find a significantly lower optical gap of 1.85 eV. The smaller gap arises from reduced confinement effects and significantly larger lattice relaxation induced by surface <em>F</em>-center defect compared to bulk. On the other hand, the polarization corrections to the optical gaps are similar for both cases.","PeriodicalId":99,"journal":{"name":"Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/d5cp02179k","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
F-center defects, occuring in technologically important wide-bandgap solids, influence the properties of the parent material. Their experimental characterization can be challenging due to low concentrations and spectral broadening. Modeling of these defects poses computational challenges due to their aperiodic nature, lattice distortion effects, and the need to describe many-body polarization effects induced by the surrounding environment. Here, we study bulk and surface F-center defects in LiF by combining random phase approximation (RPA) based potentials with periodic electrostatic embedding. We evaluate the accuracy of computationally efficient potentials such as single-pole exchange-correlation (1p-XC) and static-Coulomb hole screened exchange (st-COHSEX), and find the former to be suitable for bulk and surface F-center defects. For the commonly studied case of bulk F-centers, the 1p-XC approach predicts an optical gap (Δog) of 5.24 eV, closely matching high-level quantum chemistry methods like CASPT2 (Δog=5.31 eV) and within 0.16 eV of experimental absorption maximum. For surface F-centers, which are largely unexplored, we find a significantly lower optical gap of 1.85 eV. The smaller gap arises from reduced confinement effects and significantly larger lattice relaxation induced by surface F-center defect compared to bulk. On the other hand, the polarization corrections to the optical gaps are similar for both cases.
期刊介绍:
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP) is an international journal co-owned by 19 physical chemistry and physics societies from around the world. This journal publishes original, cutting-edge research in physical chemistry, chemical physics and biophysical chemistry. To be suitable for publication in PCCP, articles must include significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry; this is the most important criterion that reviewers and Editors will judge against when evaluating submissions.
The journal has a broad scope and welcomes contributions spanning experiment, theory, computation and data science. Topical coverage includes spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, electrochemistry, catalysis, surface science, quantum mechanics, quantum computing and machine learning. Interdisciplinary research areas such as polymers and soft matter, materials, nanoscience, energy, surfaces/interfaces, and biophysical chemistry are welcomed if they demonstrate significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry. Joined experimental/theoretical studies are particularly appreciated when complementary and based on up-to-date approaches.