Quantitative computed tomography provides improved accuracy for diagnosis of lumbar osteoporosis in patients with facet joint osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study.
{"title":"Quantitative computed tomography provides improved accuracy for diagnosis of lumbar osteoporosis in patients with facet joint osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Xiayan Wang, Chenqing Ji, Shihuai Li, Kexin Wang, Meng He, Zehao Yu, Yuanzhi Weng, Weibo Jiang, Xiongfeng Tang, Deming Guo, Yanguo Qin","doi":"10.1007/s00198-025-07600-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study employed both QCT and DXA to assess BMD in the same cohort and investigated the influence of FJOA on BMD measurements and the detection rates of osteoporosis. The results indicate that QCT is more accurate for assessing regional BMD in patients with FJOA.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to compare the detection rates of lumbar osteoporosis in patients with FJOA between QCT and DXA and to analyze the impact of FJOA on regional BMD measurement using each method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional study included participants without a history of spinal instrumentation surgery, spinal fractures of > 2 levels, spinal tumors or infections, and sacralization of lumbar spine. The detection rates of lumbar osteoporosis between QCT and DXA in patients with FJOA were compared using McNemar's test. Associations between BMDs and FJOA severity were assessed using linear mixed models. Discordance in BMD classification between DXA and QCT was categorized as minor or major according to Woodson's definition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 219 study participants had a mean age of 65.0 ± 10.7 years and included 155 (70.8%) women. The rate of lumbar osteoporosis identification with QCT was noticeably greater than that with DXA (58% vs 34.2%, p < 0.0001). Severe FJOA was independently associated with lower vBMD (multivariable β = - 4.23 (95% confidence interval (CI), - 7.68 to - 0.77); p = 0.17), while both slight-to-moderate and severe FJOA were independently associated with higher areal BMD (aBMD). With increasing FJOA severity, the aBMD measured by DXA also increased (slight-to-moderate, β = 0.31 (95% CI, 0.16-0.46), p < 0.001; severe FJOA, β = 1.03 (95% CI, 0.79-1.27), p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More severe FJOA was associated with higher aBMD on DXA and a lower vBMD on QCT. Additionally, the rate of lumbar osteoporosis detection was significantly higher with QCT than with DXA. These findings indicate that QCT is more accurate for assessing regional BMD in patients with FJOA, supporting the need for caution when using DXA to evaluate BMD in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":520737,"journal":{"name":"Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-025-07600-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study employed both QCT and DXA to assess BMD in the same cohort and investigated the influence of FJOA on BMD measurements and the detection rates of osteoporosis. The results indicate that QCT is more accurate for assessing regional BMD in patients with FJOA.
Purpose: This study aimed to compare the detection rates of lumbar osteoporosis in patients with FJOA between QCT and DXA and to analyze the impact of FJOA on regional BMD measurement using each method.
Methods: This single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional study included participants without a history of spinal instrumentation surgery, spinal fractures of > 2 levels, spinal tumors or infections, and sacralization of lumbar spine. The detection rates of lumbar osteoporosis between QCT and DXA in patients with FJOA were compared using McNemar's test. Associations between BMDs and FJOA severity were assessed using linear mixed models. Discordance in BMD classification between DXA and QCT was categorized as minor or major according to Woodson's definition.
Results: The 219 study participants had a mean age of 65.0 ± 10.7 years and included 155 (70.8%) women. The rate of lumbar osteoporosis identification with QCT was noticeably greater than that with DXA (58% vs 34.2%, p < 0.0001). Severe FJOA was independently associated with lower vBMD (multivariable β = - 4.23 (95% confidence interval (CI), - 7.68 to - 0.77); p = 0.17), while both slight-to-moderate and severe FJOA were independently associated with higher areal BMD (aBMD). With increasing FJOA severity, the aBMD measured by DXA also increased (slight-to-moderate, β = 0.31 (95% CI, 0.16-0.46), p < 0.001; severe FJOA, β = 1.03 (95% CI, 0.79-1.27), p < 0.001).
Conclusions: More severe FJOA was associated with higher aBMD on DXA and a lower vBMD on QCT. Additionally, the rate of lumbar osteoporosis detection was significantly higher with QCT than with DXA. These findings indicate that QCT is more accurate for assessing regional BMD in patients with FJOA, supporting the need for caution when using DXA to evaluate BMD in clinical practice.
本研究采用QCT和DXA评估同一队列的骨密度,探讨FJOA对骨密度测量和骨质疏松检出率的影响。结果表明,QCT对FJOA患者的局部骨密度评估更为准确。目的:本研究旨在比较QCT和DXA对FJOA患者腰椎骨质疏松症的检出率,并分析FJOA对两种方法测量区域骨密度的影响。方法:这项单中心、回顾性、横断面研究纳入了无脊柱内固定手术史、无>2水平脊柱骨折史、无脊柱肿瘤或感染史、无腰椎骶骨化史的参与者。采用McNemar试验比较QCT与DXA对FJOA患者腰椎骨质疏松的检出率。采用线性混合模型评估bmd与FJOA严重程度之间的关系。根据Woodson的定义,DXA与QCT在BMD分类上的不一致分为轻微或严重。结果:219名研究参与者的平均年龄为65.0±10.7岁,其中包括155名(70.8%)女性。QCT对腰椎骨质疏松的鉴别率明显高于DXA (58% vs 34.2%)。结论:FJOA越严重,DXA显示的aBMD越高,QCT显示的vBMD越低。此外,QCT对腰椎骨质疏松的检出率明显高于DXA。这些发现表明,QCT在评估FJOA患者的局部骨密度方面更准确,支持在临床实践中使用DXA评估骨密度时需要谨慎。