Arthur Peyrottes, Michael Baboudjian, Eric Barret, Laurent Brureau, Charles Dariane, Jonathan Olivier, Guillaume Ploussard, Paul Sargos, Stephane Supiot, Romain Mathieu
{"title":"Relugolix in prostate cancer therapy: Clinical evidence and practical considerations.","authors":"Arthur Peyrottes, Michael Baboudjian, Eric Barret, Laurent Brureau, Charles Dariane, Jonathan Olivier, Guillaume Ploussard, Paul Sargos, Stephane Supiot, Romain Mathieu","doi":"10.1016/j.fjurol.2025.102934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) remains a cornerstone of treatment for both localized and metastatic prostate cancer (PC). Relugolix, an oral gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist, provides a new option for achieving rapid testosterone suppression using an oral formulation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed by combining the search terms \"relugolix\", \"TAK-385\", \"MVT-601\", \"prostate cancer\", and \"prostatic neoplasms\" and focusing on prospective and retrospective studies published in English.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The HERO pivotal phase III trial demonstrated sustained testosterone suppression in 96.7% of patients with PC treated with relugolix versus 88.8% with leuprolide through to 48 weeks (P < 0.001). Relugolix achieved faster testosterone suppression and recovery post-treatment and a 54% lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared with leuprolide. Data from HERO and phase II studies also support its use in combination with radiotherapy or other systemic therapies. Real-world studies performed to date have confirmed the effectiveness of relugolix, with more than 98% patients achieving castrate testosterone levels. Adherence to relugolix was generally high, and its safety profile aligned with clinical trial data. Practical considerations include, among others, treatment combination and drug-drug interactions, patient choice, and oncological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinical trials and real-world evidence support relugolix as a convenient and effective ADT option for PC. It offers rapid and sustained testosterone suppression, potential cardiovascular benefits, and an alternative to injectable therapies. Long-term adherence, the use of combination treatments and related drug-drug interactions require further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":516865,"journal":{"name":"The French journal of urology","volume":" ","pages":"102934"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The French journal of urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fjurol.2025.102934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) remains a cornerstone of treatment for both localized and metastatic prostate cancer (PC). Relugolix, an oral gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist, provides a new option for achieving rapid testosterone suppression using an oral formulation.
Materials and methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed by combining the search terms "relugolix", "TAK-385", "MVT-601", "prostate cancer", and "prostatic neoplasms" and focusing on prospective and retrospective studies published in English.
Results: The HERO pivotal phase III trial demonstrated sustained testosterone suppression in 96.7% of patients with PC treated with relugolix versus 88.8% with leuprolide through to 48 weeks (P < 0.001). Relugolix achieved faster testosterone suppression and recovery post-treatment and a 54% lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared with leuprolide. Data from HERO and phase II studies also support its use in combination with radiotherapy or other systemic therapies. Real-world studies performed to date have confirmed the effectiveness of relugolix, with more than 98% patients achieving castrate testosterone levels. Adherence to relugolix was generally high, and its safety profile aligned with clinical trial data. Practical considerations include, among others, treatment combination and drug-drug interactions, patient choice, and oncological outcomes.
Conclusions: Clinical trials and real-world evidence support relugolix as a convenient and effective ADT option for PC. It offers rapid and sustained testosterone suppression, potential cardiovascular benefits, and an alternative to injectable therapies. Long-term adherence, the use of combination treatments and related drug-drug interactions require further investigation.