Prescribing androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: results of a French questionnaire survey.

Théophile Pajot, Jonathan Olivier, Denis Seguier, Arnauld Villers, Nicolas Penel
{"title":"Prescribing androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: results of a French questionnaire survey.","authors":"Théophile Pajot, Jonathan Olivier, Denis Seguier, Arnauld Villers, Nicolas Penel","doi":"10.1016/j.fjurol.2025.102930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the management of adverse effects at the initiation and during follow-up of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer (PCa), by French urologists, oncologists, and radiotherapists, including treatments with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists or antagonists and androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 23-question questionnaire was sent to French oncologists, radiotherapists and urologists via various regional and national networks. Responses were collected between February and July 2024 using a Google Form. A descriptive analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 133 respondents, 27.1% were urologists, 36.1% oncologists, and 36.8% radiotherapists, with a mean age of 38.6 years. A Likert scale was used to assess the importance of different examinations before initiating ADT, ranging from 1 (not important) to 5 (very important). Lipid profile had the highest mean score (4.12), while height measurement had the lowest (2.18). Cardiologist referral for metastatic PCa patients undergoing ADT was not systematic, with 12.7% of respondents never referring these patients to a cardiologist. Darolutamide was the least prescribed ARPI (52/133), whereas abiraterone acetate (100/133) and enzalutamide (102/133) were most commonly prescribed. Key barriers to prescribing ARPIs included cardiological follow-up, drug interactions, liver and skin toxicity, and a lack of experience with the drug.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pre-therapeutic assessment and follow-up of patients undergoing ADT seems to vary from one prescriber to another. These findings highlight opportunities to optimize treatment, particularly through medication reconciliation programs, which enhance the safe and appropriate use of ADT in PCa.</p>","PeriodicalId":516865,"journal":{"name":"The French journal of urology","volume":" ","pages":"102930"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The French journal of urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fjurol.2025.102930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to assess the management of adverse effects at the initiation and during follow-up of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer (PCa), by French urologists, oncologists, and radiotherapists, including treatments with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists or antagonists and androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs).

Methods: A 23-question questionnaire was sent to French oncologists, radiotherapists and urologists via various regional and national networks. Responses were collected between February and July 2024 using a Google Form. A descriptive analysis was performed.

Results: Among the 133 respondents, 27.1% were urologists, 36.1% oncologists, and 36.8% radiotherapists, with a mean age of 38.6 years. A Likert scale was used to assess the importance of different examinations before initiating ADT, ranging from 1 (not important) to 5 (very important). Lipid profile had the highest mean score (4.12), while height measurement had the lowest (2.18). Cardiologist referral for metastatic PCa patients undergoing ADT was not systematic, with 12.7% of respondents never referring these patients to a cardiologist. Darolutamide was the least prescribed ARPI (52/133), whereas abiraterone acetate (100/133) and enzalutamide (102/133) were most commonly prescribed. Key barriers to prescribing ARPIs included cardiological follow-up, drug interactions, liver and skin toxicity, and a lack of experience with the drug.

Conclusion: Pre-therapeutic assessment and follow-up of patients undergoing ADT seems to vary from one prescriber to another. These findings highlight opportunities to optimize treatment, particularly through medication reconciliation programs, which enhance the safe and appropriate use of ADT in PCa.

处方雄激素剥夺治疗前列腺癌:法国问卷调查的结果。
目的:本研究旨在评估法国泌尿科医生、肿瘤科医生和放射治疗师在前列腺癌(PCa)雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)开始和随访期间的不良反应管理,包括黄体生成素释放激素(LHRH)激动剂或拮抗剂和雄激素受体途径抑制剂(arpi)的治疗。方法:通过不同地区和国家网络向法国肿瘤学家、放射治疗师和泌尿科医生发送一份23题的调查问卷。在2024年2月至7月期间使用谷歌表格收集回复。进行描述性分析。结果:133名受访者中,泌尿科占27.1%,肿瘤科占36.1%,放射科占36.8%,平均年龄为38.6岁。采用李克特量表评估开始ADT前不同检查的重要性,从1(不重要)到5(非常重要)。血脂平均得分最高(4.12),身高平均得分最低(2.18)。接受ADT的转移性前列腺癌患者的心脏病专家转诊没有系统性,12.7%的受访者从未将这些患者转诊给心脏病专家。Darolutamide是ARPI最低的处方(52/133),而醋酸阿比特龙(100/133)和恩杂鲁胺(102/133)是最常用的处方。处方arpi的主要障碍包括心脏病学随访、药物相互作用、肝脏和皮肤毒性以及缺乏药物经验。结论:ADT患者的治疗前评估和随访似乎因处方者而异。这些发现强调了优化治疗的机会,特别是通过药物和解方案,这可以增强ADT在PCa中的安全和适当使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信