Saroeun Ven, Paul Fulbrook, Adam Burston, Josephine Lovegrove, Sandra J Miles
{"title":"Pressure injury risk assessment for palliative care patients in the acute hospital setting: a scoping review.","authors":"Saroeun Ven, Paul Fulbrook, Adam Burston, Josephine Lovegrove, Sandra J Miles","doi":"10.1186/s12904-025-01842-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospitalised palliative care patients are at risk of pressure injury. The development of pressure injuries causes physical and psychological distress for patients. Therefore, the prevention of hospital-acquired pressure injury is a nursing priority. The first step in prevention is conducting a risk assessment, which should be population-specific. In Australia, four palliative care phases guide care planning for appropriate clinical management of palliative care patients. In phases 1-3, the palliative patient cohort is based on acute care, where patients require medical treatment and/or symptom management, whereas Phase 4 refers to end-of-life care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To review and analyse contemporary literature to determine what is known about pressure injury risk assessment for acute palliative care patients and identify which pressure injury risk assessment tools are most appropriate for this cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review was conducted according to Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. The search strategy was developed based on the Population-Concept-Context mnemonic. Studies of any design, articles and guidelines relating to pressure injury risk assessment in acute palliative care patients were included. Publications from 2002 to 2023 from Google Advanced Search, three grey literature and five nursing/health databases (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE) were searched. The protocol was prospectively registered with Open Science Framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2,576 search results, 15 articles met the inclusion criteria. None reported the use of a pressure injury risk assessment tool designed specifically for acute palliative care patients. However, 20 pressure injury risk assessment tools/methods were identified. Furthermore, the definition of palliative care patients was inconsistent, and no articles clearly defined the differences between acute palliative care patients and those at end-of-life.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this review indicate a need to develop a new pressure injury risk assessment tool for acute palliative care patients that considers their specific risk factors. Further research is needed to address the knowledge gap relating to pressure injury risk assessment and prevention for hospitalised acute palliative care patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":48945,"journal":{"name":"BMC Palliative Care","volume":"24 1","pages":"212"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-025-01842-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Hospitalised palliative care patients are at risk of pressure injury. The development of pressure injuries causes physical and psychological distress for patients. Therefore, the prevention of hospital-acquired pressure injury is a nursing priority. The first step in prevention is conducting a risk assessment, which should be population-specific. In Australia, four palliative care phases guide care planning for appropriate clinical management of palliative care patients. In phases 1-3, the palliative patient cohort is based on acute care, where patients require medical treatment and/or symptom management, whereas Phase 4 refers to end-of-life care.
Objectives: To review and analyse contemporary literature to determine what is known about pressure injury risk assessment for acute palliative care patients and identify which pressure injury risk assessment tools are most appropriate for this cohort.
Methods: This scoping review was conducted according to Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. The search strategy was developed based on the Population-Concept-Context mnemonic. Studies of any design, articles and guidelines relating to pressure injury risk assessment in acute palliative care patients were included. Publications from 2002 to 2023 from Google Advanced Search, three grey literature and five nursing/health databases (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE) were searched. The protocol was prospectively registered with Open Science Framework.
Results: From 2,576 search results, 15 articles met the inclusion criteria. None reported the use of a pressure injury risk assessment tool designed specifically for acute palliative care patients. However, 20 pressure injury risk assessment tools/methods were identified. Furthermore, the definition of palliative care patients was inconsistent, and no articles clearly defined the differences between acute palliative care patients and those at end-of-life.
Conclusions: The results of this review indicate a need to develop a new pressure injury risk assessment tool for acute palliative care patients that considers their specific risk factors. Further research is needed to address the knowledge gap relating to pressure injury risk assessment and prevention for hospitalised acute palliative care patients.
背景:住院姑息治疗患者存在压力损伤的风险。压伤的发展给患者带来生理和心理上的困扰。因此,预防医院获得性压力损伤是护理的重点。预防的第一步是进行针对特定人群的风险评估。在澳大利亚,四个姑息治疗阶段指导姑息治疗患者的适当临床管理护理计划。在第1-3阶段,姑息治疗患者队列基于急性护理,患者需要药物治疗和/或症状管理,而第4阶段指的是临终关怀。目的:回顾和分析当代文献,以确定急性姑息治疗患者压力损伤风险评估的已知情况,并确定哪种压力损伤风险评估工具最适合该队列。方法:根据乔安娜布里格斯研究所的方法进行范围审查。该搜索策略基于人口-概念-上下文助记符。纳入了与急性姑息治疗患者压力损伤风险评估有关的任何设计、文章和指南的研究。从谷歌高级检索、3篇灰色文献和5个护理/健康数据库(护理和联合健康文献累积索引、MEDLINE、Scopus、Web of Science、EMBASE)检索2002年至2023年的出版物。该方案已前瞻性地在开放科学框架中注册。结果:在2576个检索结果中,有15篇文章符合纳入标准。没有报道使用专门为急性姑息治疗患者设计的压力损伤风险评估工具。然而,我们确定了20种压力损伤风险评估工具/方法。此外,姑息治疗患者的定义不一致,没有文章明确界定急性姑息治疗患者和临终患者之间的差异。结论:本综述的结果表明,需要为急性姑息治疗患者开发一种新的压力损伤风险评估工具,并考虑其特定的危险因素。需要进一步的研究来解决与住院急性姑息治疗患者的压力损伤风险评估和预防相关的知识差距。
期刊介绍:
BMC Palliative Care is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the clinical, scientific, ethical and policy issues, local and international, regarding all aspects of hospice and palliative care for the dying and for those with profound suffering related to chronic illness.