Development, validation and test-retest reliability of a load cell-based device for assessment of isometric forearm rotation torque.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS
Miika Köykkä, Iida Laatikainen-Raussi, Sami Vierola, Neil J Cronin, Benjamin Waller, Tomi Vänttinen
{"title":"Development, validation and test-retest reliability of a load cell-based device for assessment of isometric forearm rotation torque.","authors":"Miika Köykkä, Iida Laatikainen-Raussi, Sami Vierola, Neil J Cronin, Benjamin Waller, Tomi Vänttinen","doi":"10.1088/1361-6579/adf488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objectives.</i>This study aimed to develop and validate a load cell-based device for measuring isometric forearm rotation torque and to determine its test-retest reliability.<i>Approach.</i>The custom-built device was calibrated using known weights and validated against a high-precision torque transducer. For reliability assessment, 35 physically active participants (20 males, 15 females; age 30 ± 7 years) were tested for isometric forearm pronation and supination strength 5-7 d apart.<i>Main results.</i>The custom device demonstrated excellent validity (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), absolute agreement = 1.00;<i>r</i><sup>2</sup>= 1.00,<i>p</i>< 0.001; mean difference = -1.26-1.44%,<i>p</i>< 0.001). Test-retest reliability was excellent for absolute pronation and supination torque (ICC = 0.88-0.97; coefficient of variation percentage (CV%) = 4.1-5.6; minimal detectable change (MDC) at 90% confidence level = 13.1-19.9%), good to excellent for supination:pronation ratios (ICC = 0.60-0.88; CV% = 7.0-8.6; MDC = 0.10-0.13), and fair to good for dominant:non-dominant ratios (ICC = 0.42-0.66; CV% = 6.1-7.6; MDC = 0.07-0.10). Sex significantly influenced absolute torque values, with males demonstrating consistently higher torque, although reliability metrics were similar for both sexes.<i>Significance.</i>The device is valid, and the test is reliable. It is suitable for clinical assessments, rehabilitation monitoring, and performance evaluation, facilitating an improved understanding of factors affecting elbow overloading and injuries. Limb ratio metrics should be interpreted with caution due to their lower reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":20047,"journal":{"name":"Physiological measurement","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological measurement","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/adf488","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives.This study aimed to develop and validate a load cell-based device for measuring isometric forearm rotation torque and to determine its test-retest reliability.Approach.The custom-built device was calibrated using known weights and validated against a high-precision torque transducer. For reliability assessment, 35 physically active participants (20 males, 15 females; age 30 ± 7 years) were tested for isometric forearm pronation and supination strength 5-7 d apart.Main results.The custom device demonstrated excellent validity (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), absolute agreement = 1.00;r2= 1.00,p< 0.001; mean difference = -1.26-1.44%,p< 0.001). Test-retest reliability was excellent for absolute pronation and supination torque (ICC = 0.88-0.97; coefficient of variation percentage (CV%) = 4.1-5.6; minimal detectable change (MDC) at 90% confidence level = 13.1-19.9%), good to excellent for supination:pronation ratios (ICC = 0.60-0.88; CV% = 7.0-8.6; MDC = 0.10-0.13), and fair to good for dominant:non-dominant ratios (ICC = 0.42-0.66; CV% = 6.1-7.6; MDC = 0.07-0.10). Sex significantly influenced absolute torque values, with males demonstrating consistently higher torque, although reliability metrics were similar for both sexes.Significance.The device is valid, and the test is reliable. It is suitable for clinical assessments, rehabilitation monitoring, and performance evaluation, facilitating an improved understanding of factors affecting elbow overloading and injuries. Limb ratio metrics should be interpreted with caution due to their lower reliability.

用于评估前臂等距旋转扭矩的称重传感器装置的开发、验证和重测可靠性。
目的:本研究旨在开发和验证一种基于称重传感器的装置,用于测量前臂等距旋转扭矩,并确定其重测可靠性。方法:使用已知的重量对定制的设备进行校准,并通过高精度扭矩传感器进行验证。信度评估:35名体力活动参与者(男性20人,女性15人;年龄30±7岁),每隔5 ~ 7天进行前臂旋前和旋后强度测试。主要结果:自定义装置具有良好的效度(ICC[类内相关系数,绝对一致性]= 1.00;R2 = 1.00, p < 0.001;平均差异= -1.26-1.44%,p < 0.001)。绝对旋前和旋后扭矩的重测信度极好(ICC = 0.88-0.97;CV%[变异百分率系数]= 4.1-5.6;MDC[90%置信水平下的最小可检测变化]= 13.1-19.9%),旋前:旋前比值从良好到优异(ICC = 0.60-0.88;Cv % = 7.0-8.6;MDC = 0.10-0.13),对于占主导地位的非占主导地位的比例(ICC = 0.42-0.66;Cv % = 6.1-7.6;MDC = 0.07-0.10)。性别显著影响绝对扭矩值,尽管两性的可靠性指标相似,但男性始终表现出更高的扭矩。意义:设备有效,试验可靠。它适用于临床评估、康复监测和表现评估,有助于更好地了解影响肘关节过载和损伤的因素。肢体比率指标的可靠性较低,应谨慎解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiological measurement
Physiological measurement 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
124
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Physiological Measurement publishes papers about the quantitative assessment and visualization of physiological function in clinical research and practice, with an emphasis on the development of new methods of measurement and their validation. Papers are published on topics including: applied physiology in illness and health electrical bioimpedance, optical and acoustic measurement techniques advanced methods of time series and other data analysis biomedical and clinical engineering in-patient and ambulatory monitoring point-of-care technologies novel clinical measurements of cardiovascular, neurological, and musculoskeletal systems. measurements in molecular, cellular and organ physiology and electrophysiology physiological modeling and simulation novel biomedical sensors, instruments, devices and systems measurement standards and guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信