The Morbidity, Mortality, and Improvement Conference: An Innovative, Action-Oriented Learning Space.

IF 2.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Julie Dickinson, Sebastian Placide, Samantha Magier, Naseema B Merchant
{"title":"The Morbidity, Mortality, and Improvement Conference: An Innovative, Action-Oriented Learning Space.","authors":"Julie Dickinson, Sebastian Placide, Samantha Magier, Naseema B Merchant","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2025.06.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While providing learning from adverse events, traditional morbidity and mortality conferences may not consistently discuss systems, action items, and execution plans, or engage interprofessional audiences to address adverse events. The aim of this study was to design a space to learn from adverse events and, through engaging diverse staff, develop systems-oriented action items, establish mechanisms to follow through on these items, and close the loop with staff on system improvements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A planning group designed a quarterly conference in which involved staff review an adverse event with an interdisciplinary, interdepartmental audience. Through interactive discussion, attendees identify root causes and potential system-level solutions. Actionable solutions are implemented and communicated at the next conference. Attendee surveys were conducted to gauge the perceived impact of the conference series on safety culture. The monthly average of submitted safety reports was evaluated as a surrogate safety culture marker.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Conference attendance grew by 157.5%. Participants reported increased comfort in raising concerns (from 84.0% to 100.0%), improved interprofessional teamwork (from 84.0% to 100.0%), unit-based shifts to a learning culture (from 64.0% to 93.4%), positive clinical area changes (from 52.0% to 90.0%), and positive health system changes (from 84.0% to 96.7%). The average number of monthly safety reports increased by 17.0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The morbidity, mortality, and improvement conference demonstrated improvements in reported safety attitudes, interdisciplinary collaboration, system design, learning culture, psychological safety, and safety reporting. This interdisciplinary, interdepartmental, system-focused, interactive conference with closed-loop communication is an effective tool for cultivating trust in safety culture and transforming staff into safety ambassadors and change agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2025.06.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While providing learning from adverse events, traditional morbidity and mortality conferences may not consistently discuss systems, action items, and execution plans, or engage interprofessional audiences to address adverse events. The aim of this study was to design a space to learn from adverse events and, through engaging diverse staff, develop systems-oriented action items, establish mechanisms to follow through on these items, and close the loop with staff on system improvements.

Methods: A planning group designed a quarterly conference in which involved staff review an adverse event with an interdisciplinary, interdepartmental audience. Through interactive discussion, attendees identify root causes and potential system-level solutions. Actionable solutions are implemented and communicated at the next conference. Attendee surveys were conducted to gauge the perceived impact of the conference series on safety culture. The monthly average of submitted safety reports was evaluated as a surrogate safety culture marker.

Results: Conference attendance grew by 157.5%. Participants reported increased comfort in raising concerns (from 84.0% to 100.0%), improved interprofessional teamwork (from 84.0% to 100.0%), unit-based shifts to a learning culture (from 64.0% to 93.4%), positive clinical area changes (from 52.0% to 90.0%), and positive health system changes (from 84.0% to 96.7%). The average number of monthly safety reports increased by 17.0%.

Conclusion: The morbidity, mortality, and improvement conference demonstrated improvements in reported safety attitudes, interdisciplinary collaboration, system design, learning culture, psychological safety, and safety reporting. This interdisciplinary, interdepartmental, system-focused, interactive conference with closed-loop communication is an effective tool for cultivating trust in safety culture and transforming staff into safety ambassadors and change agents.

发病率,死亡率和改进会议:一个创新的,以行动为导向的学习空间。
背景:在提供从不良事件中学习的同时,传统的发病率和死亡率会议可能无法一致地讨论系统、行动项目和执行计划,或让跨专业听众参与处理不良事件。本研究的目的是设计一个从不良事件中学习的空间,并通过吸引不同的员工,制定面向系统的行动项目,建立机制来跟进这些项目,并与员工一起完成系统改进的循环。方法:一个计划小组设计了一个季度的会议,在这个会议上,涉及人员与跨学科、跨部门的听众一起审查不良事件。通过互动讨论,与会者确定了根本原因和潜在的系统级解决方案。可操作的解决方案在下次会议上得到实施和沟通。与会者进行调查,以衡量会议系列对安全文化的感知影响。每月提交的安全报告的平均值被评估为替代安全文化标记。结果:会议出席人数增长了157.5%。参与者报告说,提出担忧的舒适度增加了(从84.0%增加到100.0%),跨专业团队合作得到改善(从84.0%增加到100.0%),以单位为基础的学习文化转变(从64.0%增加到93.4%),积极的临床领域变化(从52.0%增加到90.0%),积极的卫生系统变化(从84.0%增加到96.7%)。每月安全报告的平均数量增加了17.0%。结论:发病率、死亡率和改进会议显示了报告安全态度、跨学科合作、系统设计、学习文化、心理安全和安全报告方面的改进。这是一个跨学科、跨部门、以系统为重点的互动会议,并设有闭环沟通,是培养对安全文化的信任,并将员工转变为安全大使和变革推动者的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
49 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信