Lina Atlagh, Anne-Claire Toublanc, Benoit Roch, Arianna Marinello, Julia Ruuth-Praz, Sophie Cousin, Christos Chouaid, Céline Basset, Solène Evrard, Michaël Duruisseaux, Nicolas Girard, Karine Durand, Julien Mazières, Aurélien Brindel
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes of Compound EGFR Mutations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A National, Retrospective, Multicenter Study.","authors":"Lina Atlagh, Anne-Claire Toublanc, Benoit Roch, Arianna Marinello, Julia Ruuth-Praz, Sophie Cousin, Christos Chouaid, Céline Basset, Solène Evrard, Michaël Duruisseaux, Nicolas Girard, Karine Durand, Julien Mazières, Aurélien Brindel","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Compound EGFR mutations are found in a rare proportion of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently there is no clear recommendation regarding the best therapeutic strategy in this setting. Chemotherapy, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are often used as first or second line of treatment. Recently, an in vitro structure-based classification of EGFR mutations showed a promising way of predicting response to treatment (Robichaux JC, Nature 2021).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, nationwide study of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring compound EGFR mutations. The common T790M mutation and exon 20 insertions were excluded. Compound EGFR mutations were structure-based classified as classical mutations and P-loop and αC-helix compressing (PACC) mutations or unclassified mutations. Clinical data and outcome of selected patients were collected. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) according to structure-based classification and exon-based classification were reported, overall survival being the primary objective.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-one patients were enrolled in the analysis, including 24 patients in \"classical mutations\" group, 36 in the PACC group, and 21 as unclassified group. Median overall survival (OS) of the population was 42 months (95% CI, 25.5-64.4), significantly different according to structure-based classification (69.5 m in unclassified group, vs 47 m in classical mutations group and 24,3 in PACC mutations group, P = .01). There was no significant difference in OS according to the type of first-line treatment in the overall population or the presence or not of a frequent mutation (L858R or Del19). The median progression free survival in the first line setting (PFS1L) was shorter in the chemotherapy group (7.1 m.; 95% CI, 1.9-12.2) than in the TKI group (12.6 m.; 95% CI, 8.6-17), P = .005. In the PACC group, PFS1L was higher in the osimertinib group compared to other treatments, HR 0.34 (95% CI, 0.12-0.99), P=.027, whereas no difference was observed in other structure-based groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates that treatment with TKIs is associated with favorable outcomes in patients with compound EGFR mutations. Structure-based configuration of EGFR might also be considered when selecting a first-line TKI.</p>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical lung cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2025.06.005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Compound EGFR mutations are found in a rare proportion of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently there is no clear recommendation regarding the best therapeutic strategy in this setting. Chemotherapy, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are often used as first or second line of treatment. Recently, an in vitro structure-based classification of EGFR mutations showed a promising way of predicting response to treatment (Robichaux JC, Nature 2021).
Methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, nationwide study of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring compound EGFR mutations. The common T790M mutation and exon 20 insertions were excluded. Compound EGFR mutations were structure-based classified as classical mutations and P-loop and αC-helix compressing (PACC) mutations or unclassified mutations. Clinical data and outcome of selected patients were collected. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) according to structure-based classification and exon-based classification were reported, overall survival being the primary objective.
Results: Eighty-one patients were enrolled in the analysis, including 24 patients in "classical mutations" group, 36 in the PACC group, and 21 as unclassified group. Median overall survival (OS) of the population was 42 months (95% CI, 25.5-64.4), significantly different according to structure-based classification (69.5 m in unclassified group, vs 47 m in classical mutations group and 24,3 in PACC mutations group, P = .01). There was no significant difference in OS according to the type of first-line treatment in the overall population or the presence or not of a frequent mutation (L858R or Del19). The median progression free survival in the first line setting (PFS1L) was shorter in the chemotherapy group (7.1 m.; 95% CI, 1.9-12.2) than in the TKI group (12.6 m.; 95% CI, 8.6-17), P = .005. In the PACC group, PFS1L was higher in the osimertinib group compared to other treatments, HR 0.34 (95% CI, 0.12-0.99), P=.027, whereas no difference was observed in other structure-based groups.
Conclusions: This study demonstrates that treatment with TKIs is associated with favorable outcomes in patients with compound EGFR mutations. Structure-based configuration of EGFR might also be considered when selecting a first-line TKI.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Lung Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lung cancer. Clinical Lung Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lung cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lung cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.