Amarnath R. Annapureddy MD MSc , Karthik Murugiah MD , Luke Zheng BS , Karl E. Minges PhD, MPH , Gowtham R. Grandhi MD, MPH , Joseph S. Ross MD, MHS , Tariq Ahmad MD, MPH , Benjamin A. Rodwin MD , Sanket S. Dhruva MD, MHS , Saket Girotra MD, SM , Elias J. Dayoub MD , Jeptha P. Curtis MD , Nihar R. Desai MD
{"title":"Relationship between industry payments to physicians and prescription patterns for PCSK9is, ARNis and DOACs: A report from the NCDR PINNACLE registry","authors":"Amarnath R. Annapureddy MD MSc , Karthik Murugiah MD , Luke Zheng BS , Karl E. Minges PhD, MPH , Gowtham R. Grandhi MD, MPH , Joseph S. Ross MD, MHS , Tariq Ahmad MD, MPH , Benjamin A. Rodwin MD , Sanket S. Dhruva MD, MHS , Saket Girotra MD, SM , Elias J. Dayoub MD , Jeptha P. Curtis MD , Nihar R. Desai MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2025.07.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>We examined the association of industry payments to physicians and prescriptions for proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi), and direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using 2017 data from the NCDR PINNACLE Registry, we idenitifed 3 patient cohorts: those with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and/or dyslipidemia, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). We linked physicians to the 2017 Open Payments data using National Provider Identifiers to determine whether they had received industry payments related to PCSK9 inhibitors, ARNi, or DOACs. The primary outcome of the study was the proportion of patients within each cohort who were prescribed the corresponding medication. Within each cohort, we evaluated the association between the receipt of industry payments by the treating physician (<$100, $100-$1,000, >$1,000) and likelihood of prescribing the corresponding medication using regression analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 0.2% of ASCVD patients were prescribed PCSK9 inhibitors, 9.0% of HFrEF patients were prescribed ARNi, and 38.7% of NVAF patients were prescribed DOACs. Patients whose physicians receiveds payments related to PCSK inhibitors were more likely to be prescribed them (ASCVD cohort: odds ratio [OR] 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI],1.15-1.57), as were patients in the HFrEF cohort prescribed ARNi (OR 1.43; 95% CI, 1.19-1.71). No significant association was observed for DOAC prescribing (OR 0.99; 95% CI, 0.95-1.03). Across all 3 cohorts, physicians who received higher-value payments were more likely to prescribe the corresponding medications than those who received lower-value payments.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients with ASCVD or HFrEF whose physicians received industry payments were more likely to be prescribed PCSK9 inhibitors or ARNi, regardless of the payment amount. For DOACs, an association with prescribing was observed only among physicians who received higher-value payments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":"291 ","pages":"Pages 26-36"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002870325002248","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
We examined the association of industry payments to physicians and prescriptions for proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi), and direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC).
Methods
Using 2017 data from the NCDR PINNACLE Registry, we idenitifed 3 patient cohorts: those with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and/or dyslipidemia, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). We linked physicians to the 2017 Open Payments data using National Provider Identifiers to determine whether they had received industry payments related to PCSK9 inhibitors, ARNi, or DOACs. The primary outcome of the study was the proportion of patients within each cohort who were prescribed the corresponding medication. Within each cohort, we evaluated the association between the receipt of industry payments by the treating physician (<$100, $100-$1,000, >$1,000) and likelihood of prescribing the corresponding medication using regression analyses.
Results
Overall, 0.2% of ASCVD patients were prescribed PCSK9 inhibitors, 9.0% of HFrEF patients were prescribed ARNi, and 38.7% of NVAF patients were prescribed DOACs. Patients whose physicians receiveds payments related to PCSK inhibitors were more likely to be prescribed them (ASCVD cohort: odds ratio [OR] 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI],1.15-1.57), as were patients in the HFrEF cohort prescribed ARNi (OR 1.43; 95% CI, 1.19-1.71). No significant association was observed for DOAC prescribing (OR 0.99; 95% CI, 0.95-1.03). Across all 3 cohorts, physicians who received higher-value payments were more likely to prescribe the corresponding medications than those who received lower-value payments.
Conclusions
Patients with ASCVD or HFrEF whose physicians received industry payments were more likely to be prescribed PCSK9 inhibitors or ARNi, regardless of the payment amount. For DOACs, an association with prescribing was observed only among physicians who received higher-value payments.
期刊介绍:
The American Heart Journal will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the broad discipline of cardiovascular disease. Our goal is to provide the reader primary investigation, scholarly review, and opinion concerning the practice of cardiovascular medicine. We especially encourage submission of 3 types of reports that are not frequently seen in cardiovascular journals: negative clinical studies, reports on study designs, and studies involving the organization of medical care. The Journal does not accept individual case reports or original articles involving bench laboratory or animal research.