"Synthesizing Safety Data on Novel Intravaginal Formulations: A Comprehensive Scoping Review of In vivo and In vitro Research".

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
T P Athul, Anjani Seth, Vanshika Sharma, Meenakshi Pandey, R Galib, Sanjay Jachak, Tanuja Nesari, Meena S Deogade
{"title":"\"Synthesizing Safety Data on Novel Intravaginal Formulations: A Comprehensive Scoping Review of In vivo and In vitro Research\".","authors":"T P Athul, Anjani Seth, Vanshika Sharma, Meenakshi Pandey, R Galib, Sanjay Jachak, Tanuja Nesari, Meena S Deogade","doi":"10.1016/j.pharma.2025.07.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Intravaginal drug delivery systems are gaining attention for their potential to treat local and systemic gynaecological conditions, offering advantages such as bypassing hepatic first-pass metabolism and improved bioavailability. However, the safety evaluation of these novel formulations remains inconsistent, with limited regulatory guidance. This scoping review aims to consolidate data from in vivo and in vitro safety studies to support the design of standardized safety protocols for future intravaginal formulations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic data search was conducted using PubMed and Scopus (2009-2024) data base following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Eligible studies were included after data screening by individual reviewers. Study selection, data extraction, and charting were performed using a pre-defined protocol registered on the Open Science Framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 77 studies were included, comprising 64 in vivo and 13 in vitro studies. Rabbit was the frequently used animal model, while HeLa and normal vaginal epithelial cells were predominant in cell-based assays. Key safety endpoints evaluated included vaginal irritation, systemic toxicity, cytotoxicity, and cytokine expression. A wide range of formulations was assessed, including gels, rings, suppositories, and hydrogels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review highlights the need for harmonized safety assessment protocols for intravaginal formulations. By mapping current practices and models used in preclinical research, this work offers a foundation for researchers and regulators to develop more robust and standardized safety evaluation frameworks.</p>","PeriodicalId":8332,"journal":{"name":"Annales pharmaceutiques francaises","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales pharmaceutiques francaises","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharma.2025.07.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Intravaginal drug delivery systems are gaining attention for their potential to treat local and systemic gynaecological conditions, offering advantages such as bypassing hepatic first-pass metabolism and improved bioavailability. However, the safety evaluation of these novel formulations remains inconsistent, with limited regulatory guidance. This scoping review aims to consolidate data from in vivo and in vitro safety studies to support the design of standardized safety protocols for future intravaginal formulations.

Materials and methods: A systematic data search was conducted using PubMed and Scopus (2009-2024) data base following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Eligible studies were included after data screening by individual reviewers. Study selection, data extraction, and charting were performed using a pre-defined protocol registered on the Open Science Framework.

Results: A total of 77 studies were included, comprising 64 in vivo and 13 in vitro studies. Rabbit was the frequently used animal model, while HeLa and normal vaginal epithelial cells were predominant in cell-based assays. Key safety endpoints evaluated included vaginal irritation, systemic toxicity, cytotoxicity, and cytokine expression. A wide range of formulations was assessed, including gels, rings, suppositories, and hydrogels.

Conclusions: This review highlights the need for harmonized safety assessment protocols for intravaginal formulations. By mapping current practices and models used in preclinical research, this work offers a foundation for researchers and regulators to develop more robust and standardized safety evaluation frameworks.

“综合新型阴道内制剂的安全性数据:体内和体外研究的全面范围综述”。
背景和目的:阴道内给药系统因其治疗局部和全身妇科疾病的潜力而受到关注,其优点包括绕过肝脏第一过代谢和提高生物利用度。然而,这些新配方的安全性评估仍然不一致,监管指导有限。本综述旨在整合体内和体外安全性研究的数据,以支持未来阴道内制剂标准化安全方案的设计。材料和方法:根据PRISMA-ScR指南,使用PubMed和Scopus(2009-2024)数据库进行系统的数据检索。经个人审稿人筛选数据后纳入符合条件的研究。研究选择、数据提取和制图使用在开放科学框架上注册的预定义协议进行。结果:共纳入77项研究,其中64项体内研究和13项体外研究。兔是常用的动物模型,而以HeLa和正常阴道上皮细胞为主。评估的主要安全性终点包括阴道刺激、全身毒性、细胞毒性和细胞因子表达。广泛的配方被评估,包括凝胶,环,栓剂和水凝胶。结论:本综述强调了对阴道内制剂制定统一的安全性评估方案的必要性。通过绘制临床前研究中使用的当前实践和模型,这项工作为研究人员和监管机构开发更强大和标准化的安全性评估框架提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annales pharmaceutiques francaises
Annales pharmaceutiques francaises PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
98
期刊介绍: This journal proposes a scientific information validated and indexed to be informed about the last research works in all the domains interesting the pharmacy. The original works, general reviews, the focusing, the brief notes, subjected by the best academics and the professionals, propose a synthetic approach of the last progress accomplished in the concerned sectors. The thematic Sessions and the – life of the Academy – resume the communications which, presented in front of the national Academy of pharmacy, are in the heart of the current events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信