Risk of Infections with SGLT2 Inhibitors Versus DPP4 Inhibitors: A Population-Based Cohort Study Using Antibiotic Dispensing Data.

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Maria J Alfonso Arvez, George S Q Tan, Sam Wade, Zanfina Ademi, Jenni Ilomäki, J Simon Bell
{"title":"Risk of Infections with SGLT2 Inhibitors Versus DPP4 Inhibitors: A Population-Based Cohort Study Using Antibiotic Dispensing Data.","authors":"Maria J Alfonso Arvez, George S Q Tan, Sam Wade, Zanfina Ademi, Jenni Ilomäki, J Simon Bell","doi":"10.1002/cpt.70016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study compared the number and cumulative dose of antibiotic dispensings among new users of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors following hospital discharge in individuals with type 2 diabetes. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from public and private hospitals in Victoria, Australia. Antibiotic dispensings were assessed over 12 months among new users of these medicines. Negative binomial regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to estimate weighted incidence rate ratios and confidence intervals for the total number of antibiotic dispensings and cumulative defined daily doses, stratified by antibiotic class. A total of 58.3% of SGLT2 inhibitor users (9,162 individuals) and 61.4% of DPP4 inhibitor users (16,589 individuals) received antibiotics. Initiators of SGLT2 inhibitors had a lower number of overall antibiotic dispensings compared with initiators of DPP4 inhibitors (weighted incidence rate ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.85 to 0.90), a pattern that was consistent across antibiotic classes. SGLT2 inhibitor initiators also had lower cumulative defined daily doses overall (weighted incidence rate ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.86 to 0.93), with significantly lower doses for penicillins, sulphonamides, and quinolones. These findings suggest that the initiation of SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with lower antibiotic use in terms of both the number of dispensings and cumulative dose, indicating potentially lower rates of infections among individuals with type 2 diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.70016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study compared the number and cumulative dose of antibiotic dispensings among new users of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors following hospital discharge in individuals with type 2 diabetes. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from public and private hospitals in Victoria, Australia. Antibiotic dispensings were assessed over 12 months among new users of these medicines. Negative binomial regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to estimate weighted incidence rate ratios and confidence intervals for the total number of antibiotic dispensings and cumulative defined daily doses, stratified by antibiotic class. A total of 58.3% of SGLT2 inhibitor users (9,162 individuals) and 61.4% of DPP4 inhibitor users (16,589 individuals) received antibiotics. Initiators of SGLT2 inhibitors had a lower number of overall antibiotic dispensings compared with initiators of DPP4 inhibitors (weighted incidence rate ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.85 to 0.90), a pattern that was consistent across antibiotic classes. SGLT2 inhibitor initiators also had lower cumulative defined daily doses overall (weighted incidence rate ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.86 to 0.93), with significantly lower doses for penicillins, sulphonamides, and quinolones. These findings suggest that the initiation of SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with lower antibiotic use in terms of both the number of dispensings and cumulative dose, indicating potentially lower rates of infections among individuals with type 2 diabetes.

SGLT2抑制剂与DPP4抑制剂的感染风险:一项基于人群的抗生素分配数据队列研究
本研究比较了2型糖尿病患者出院后新使用钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2 (SGLT2)抑制剂和二肽基肽酶-4 (DPP4)抑制剂的患者的抗生素配药数量和累积剂量。一项回顾性队列研究使用了澳大利亚维多利亚州公立和私立医院的数据。对这些药物的新使用者进行了为期12个月的抗生素分配评估。采用治疗加权逆概率负二项回归估计抗生素总配药数和累计限定日剂量的加权发生率比和置信区间,并按抗生素类别分层。共有58.3%的SGLT2抑制剂使用者(9162人)和61.4%的DPP4抑制剂使用者(16589人)接受了抗生素治疗。与DPP4抑制剂的启动剂相比,SGLT2抑制剂的启动剂的总抗生素配剂数量更少(加权发病率比0.88,95%置信区间0.85至0.90),这一模式在抗生素类别中是一致的。SGLT2抑制剂启动剂的总体累积定义日剂量也较低(加权发病率比0.89,95%可信区间0.86至0.93),青霉素类、磺胺类和喹诺酮类药物的剂量显著较低。这些发现表明,就配药数量和累积剂量而言,开始使用SGLT2抑制剂与较低的抗生素使用相关,这表明2型糖尿病患者的感染率可能较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.50%
发文量
290
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (CPT) is the authoritative cross-disciplinary journal in experimental and clinical medicine devoted to publishing advances in the nature, action, efficacy, and evaluation of therapeutics. CPT welcomes original Articles in the emerging areas of translational, predictive and personalized medicine; new therapeutic modalities including gene and cell therapies; pharmacogenomics, proteomics and metabolomics; bioinformation and applied systems biology complementing areas of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, human investigation and clinical trials, pharmacovigilence, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacometrics, and population pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信