Impact of Ablation Targeting Atrial Drivers and Fragmented Potentials on Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Study

IF 1.7 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yuma Gibo, Morio Ono, Yui Koyanagi, Katsuya Yoshihiro, Soichiro Usumoto, Toshihiko Gokan, Toshitaka Okabe, Naoei Isomura, Mitunori Muto, Masaru Shiigai, Junko Honye, Masahiko Ochiai
{"title":"Impact of Ablation Targeting Atrial Drivers and Fragmented Potentials on Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Study","authors":"Yuma Gibo,&nbsp;Morio Ono,&nbsp;Yui Koyanagi,&nbsp;Katsuya Yoshihiro,&nbsp;Soichiro Usumoto,&nbsp;Toshihiko Gokan,&nbsp;Toshitaka Okabe,&nbsp;Naoei Isomura,&nbsp;Mitunori Muto,&nbsp;Masaru Shiigai,&nbsp;Junko Honye,&nbsp;Masahiko Ochiai","doi":"10.1002/joa3.70160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) often shows resistance to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of catheter ablation targeting electrophysiological substrates versus conventional PVI in patients with long-standing persistent AF.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective study included 105 patients with long-standing persistent AF who underwent initial catheter ablation between June 2021 and June 2023. After propensity score matching (<i>n</i> = 38 each), we compared conventional PVI (conventional group) with additional ablation targeting AF drivers and fragmented potentials (driver and fragmented potentials group). The primary endpoint was AF recurrence lasting &gt; 30 s occurring ≥ 3 months post-ablation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Procedure times were longer in the driver and fragmented potentials group (166.1 ± 35.9 vs. 140.7 ± 50.4 min, <i>p</i> = 0.01). Higher rotational activity was observed in the left atrial appendage and bottom regions in this group. Over a mean follow-up of 383.5 ± 21.1 days, AF recurrence was numerically lower in the driver and fragmented potentials group (21.1% vs. 36.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.13). Post-ablation premature atrial contractions were significantly fewer in the driver and fragmented potentials group (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Multivariate analysis identified fragmented potentials and driver activity in the bottom region as independent predictors of AF recurrence (<i>p</i> = 0.02; 95% CI: 1.08–3.12).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Ablation targeting atrial drivers and fragmented potentials demonstrated a trend toward improved clinical outcomes compared to conventional PVI alone, with reduced AF recurrence and PAC burden. The bottom region of the left atrium appears to be a significant therapeutic target for improving long-term success in long-standing persistent AF ablation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"41 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joa3.70160","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arrhythmia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.70160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) often shows resistance to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of catheter ablation targeting electrophysiological substrates versus conventional PVI in patients with long-standing persistent AF.

Methods

This retrospective study included 105 patients with long-standing persistent AF who underwent initial catheter ablation between June 2021 and June 2023. After propensity score matching (n = 38 each), we compared conventional PVI (conventional group) with additional ablation targeting AF drivers and fragmented potentials (driver and fragmented potentials group). The primary endpoint was AF recurrence lasting > 30 s occurring ≥ 3 months post-ablation.

Results

Procedure times were longer in the driver and fragmented potentials group (166.1 ± 35.9 vs. 140.7 ± 50.4 min, p = 0.01). Higher rotational activity was observed in the left atrial appendage and bottom regions in this group. Over a mean follow-up of 383.5 ± 21.1 days, AF recurrence was numerically lower in the driver and fragmented potentials group (21.1% vs. 36.8%, p = 0.13). Post-ablation premature atrial contractions were significantly fewer in the driver and fragmented potentials group (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis identified fragmented potentials and driver activity in the bottom region as independent predictors of AF recurrence (p = 0.02; 95% CI: 1.08–3.12).

Conclusions

Ablation targeting atrial drivers and fragmented potentials demonstrated a trend toward improved clinical outcomes compared to conventional PVI alone, with reduced AF recurrence and PAC burden. The bottom region of the left atrium appears to be a significant therapeutic target for improving long-term success in long-standing persistent AF ablation.

Abstract Image

针对心房驱动因子和碎片化电位的消融对长期持续性心房颤动的影响:一项回顾性研究
背景:长期持续性心房颤动(AF)通常表现出对单独肺静脉隔离(PVI)的抵抗。本研究旨在比较针对电生理底物的导管消融与传统PVI治疗长期持续性房颤的结果。方法本回顾性研究纳入了105例在2021年6月至2023年6月间接受首次导管消融治疗的长期持续性房颤患者。在倾向评分匹配(n = 38)后,我们比较了常规PVI(常规组)与额外消融靶向心房颤动驱动因素和碎片化电位(驱动因素和碎片化电位组)。主要终点为消融后≥3个月持续30秒的房颤复发。结果驱动电位组和碎片电位组手术时间较长(166.1±35.9 min vs 140.7±50.4 min, p = 0.01)。在左心耳和底部区域观察到较高的旋转活动。在平均383.5±21.1天的随访中,驱动电位组和碎片电位组的房颤复发率较低(21.1%比36.8%,p = 0.13)。驱动电位组和碎片电位组消融后心房早搏明显减少(p < 0.01)。多因素分析发现,底部区域的碎片化电位和驱动活性是房颤复发的独立预测因素(p = 0.02;95% ci: 1.08-3.12)。结论:与单独使用常规PVI相比,针对心房驱动因子和碎片电位的消融显示出改善临床结果的趋势,减少了房颤复发和PAC负担。左心房底区似乎是提高长期持续性房颤消融长期成功的重要治疗靶点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Arrhythmia
Journal of Arrhythmia CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
127
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信