A Retrospective Analysis of Circular Economy and Industrial Decarbonization Metrics in the United States, 1998–2022

Heather P. H. Liddell, Brian M. Ray, Joseph W. Cresko
{"title":"A Retrospective Analysis of Circular Economy and Industrial Decarbonization Metrics in the United States, 1998–2022","authors":"Heather P. H. Liddell,&nbsp;Brian M. Ray,&nbsp;Joseph W. Cresko","doi":"10.1002/amp2.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>While technical strategies for industrial decarbonization can be synergistic with those supporting a circular economy, metrics for decarbonization and circularity are distinct (and not necessarily correlated). We analyze time-series data for the period 1998–2022 synthesized from multiple U.S. governmental datasets, including new input/output data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis's 2023 Comprehensive Update of the National Economic Accounts, to take a “pulse check” on decarbonization and circularity metrics in the United States. This includes a retrospective analysis of trends in industrial emissions intensity over time (based on historical Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey data) and correlations with salient economic metrics for 18 U.S. manufacturing industries. Some industries are reducing their emissions much faster than others, and we show that this pace of change—at least for certain industries—has to do with industry growth rates as well as predictable lock-in effects related to investments in capital assets. The analysis is extended to an initial exploration of interconnectedness between industry growth, material flows, and indicators relevant to the circular economy. We leverage data from economic input–output tables to assess the intensiveness of virgin material use in U.S. manufacturing supply chains, and comment on the usefulness of these measures as high-level indicators for circularity and circularity potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":87290,"journal":{"name":"Journal of advanced manufacturing and processing","volume":"7 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/amp2.70013","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of advanced manufacturing and processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/amp2.70013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While technical strategies for industrial decarbonization can be synergistic with those supporting a circular economy, metrics for decarbonization and circularity are distinct (and not necessarily correlated). We analyze time-series data for the period 1998–2022 synthesized from multiple U.S. governmental datasets, including new input/output data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis's 2023 Comprehensive Update of the National Economic Accounts, to take a “pulse check” on decarbonization and circularity metrics in the United States. This includes a retrospective analysis of trends in industrial emissions intensity over time (based on historical Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey data) and correlations with salient economic metrics for 18 U.S. manufacturing industries. Some industries are reducing their emissions much faster than others, and we show that this pace of change—at least for certain industries—has to do with industry growth rates as well as predictable lock-in effects related to investments in capital assets. The analysis is extended to an initial exploration of interconnectedness between industry growth, material flows, and indicators relevant to the circular economy. We leverage data from economic input–output tables to assess the intensiveness of virgin material use in U.S. manufacturing supply chains, and comment on the usefulness of these measures as high-level indicators for circularity and circularity potential.

Abstract Image

1998-2022年美国循环经济与工业脱碳指标回顾分析
虽然工业脱碳的技术战略可以与支持循环经济的技术战略协同作用,但脱碳和循环的指标是不同的(不一定相关)。我们分析了从多个美国政府数据集合成的1998-2022年期间的时间序列数据,包括经济分析局《2023年国民经济账户全面更新》中的新投入/产出数据,以对美国的脱碳和循环指标进行“脉冲检查”。这包括对工业排放强度随时间变化趋势的回顾性分析(基于历史制造业能源消耗调查数据),以及与美国18个主要经济指标的相关性制造业。一些行业的减排速度比其他行业快得多,我们表明,这种变化的速度——至少对某些行业来说——与行业增长率以及与资本资产投资相关的可预测锁定效应有关。分析扩展到对行业增长、物质流动和与循环经济相关的指标之间的相互联系的初步探索。我们利用经济投入产出表中的数据来评估美国制造业供应链中原始材料使用的集约度,并评论这些措施作为循环性和循环潜力的高级指标的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信