Oksana A. Makarova, Basuhi Ravi, Margaret J. Sobkowicz, Davide Masato, Elsa A. Olivetti
{"title":"Addressing Favorable and Challenging Flexible Plastic Packaging Waste Flows: A Material Flow Analysis","authors":"Oksana A. Makarova, Basuhi Ravi, Margaret J. Sobkowicz, Davide Masato, Elsa A. Olivetti","doi":"10.1002/amp2.70014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The majority of post-consumer flexible plastic packaging (FPP) in the United States ends up in landfills and incinerators. This represents a significant material loss because FPP, also referred to as plastic films or foils, comprises up to half of all plastic packaging. Since FPP encompasses a diverse range of products with varying recycling potentials, improving material recovery rates requires a detailed understanding of the composition and quantities of used films. This study quantifies post-consumer FPP flows in the US for 2021 and estimates the fraction most suitable for mechanical recycling. We conducted a material flow analysis (MFA) by reconciling publicly available data on packaging film generation and recycling from the US and comparable economies. We then categorized post-consumer FPP into three broad categories based on factors affecting the quality of the resulting mechanically recycled material. Our analysis reveals that only 3%–8% of the estimated 5–15 million metric tonnes of post-consumer film were recycled in 2021. Furthermore, at most 40% of the FPP could be readily mechanically recyclable, while up to half would be deemed non-recoverable due to techno-economic constraints. The actual proportions of challenging-to-recycle and non-recoverable FPP might be even higher, underscoring the need for updated studies on film generation and waste composition to assess the feasibility of scaling up nationwide film recycling.</p>","PeriodicalId":87290,"journal":{"name":"Journal of advanced manufacturing and processing","volume":"7 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/amp2.70014","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of advanced manufacturing and processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://aiche.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/amp2.70014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The majority of post-consumer flexible plastic packaging (FPP) in the United States ends up in landfills and incinerators. This represents a significant material loss because FPP, also referred to as plastic films or foils, comprises up to half of all plastic packaging. Since FPP encompasses a diverse range of products with varying recycling potentials, improving material recovery rates requires a detailed understanding of the composition and quantities of used films. This study quantifies post-consumer FPP flows in the US for 2021 and estimates the fraction most suitable for mechanical recycling. We conducted a material flow analysis (MFA) by reconciling publicly available data on packaging film generation and recycling from the US and comparable economies. We then categorized post-consumer FPP into three broad categories based on factors affecting the quality of the resulting mechanically recycled material. Our analysis reveals that only 3%–8% of the estimated 5–15 million metric tonnes of post-consumer film were recycled in 2021. Furthermore, at most 40% of the FPP could be readily mechanically recyclable, while up to half would be deemed non-recoverable due to techno-economic constraints. The actual proportions of challenging-to-recycle and non-recoverable FPP might be even higher, underscoring the need for updated studies on film generation and waste composition to assess the feasibility of scaling up nationwide film recycling.