Adrian D. Hendrickse, Patrick X. O'Donnell, Susan C. Connors, Christine Nguyen-Buckley, Mercedes S. Mandell
{"title":"The Liver Transplant Anesthesiology Fellowship Training Paradigm Across the United States: Looking for the Next Steps in Quality Education","authors":"Adrian D. Hendrickse, Patrick X. O'Donnell, Susan C. Connors, Christine Nguyen-Buckley, Mercedes S. Mandell","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Liver transplant anesthesia is a growing nonaccredited subspecialty. Although educational milestones and core competencies for training are published, there is a lack of research into how training is delivered to prepare fellows for independent practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In September 2020, the fellowship directors at all 19 training programs across the United States known to the Society for the Advancement of Transplant Anesthesia (SATA) were surveyed regarding their programs’ educational management processes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 17 fellowship directors responded to more than 70% of survey questions (89%). Few programs had a sequential learning plan that built knowledge and skill sets over time. Learning was primarily based on teaching during clinical care of patients while training time varied between programs. No directors were trained in curriculum development, but most (9/11 respondents) expressed interest in additional education if time was allotted for this task. Even with these challenges, respondents had few problems originating fellowship programs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Liver transplant anesthesia fellowships had few common educational management processes that allowed for meaningful comparison of educational products between centers. This suggests that trainees are likely to have a wide variability in knowledge and skills that can affect the quality of care delivered. We suggest that national support for fellowship training may help to promote a more ordered yet flexible process at training programs that will improve subsequent patient care.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"39 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70250","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Liver transplant anesthesia is a growing nonaccredited subspecialty. Although educational milestones and core competencies for training are published, there is a lack of research into how training is delivered to prepare fellows for independent practice.
Methods
In September 2020, the fellowship directors at all 19 training programs across the United States known to the Society for the Advancement of Transplant Anesthesia (SATA) were surveyed regarding their programs’ educational management processes.
Results
A total of 17 fellowship directors responded to more than 70% of survey questions (89%). Few programs had a sequential learning plan that built knowledge and skill sets over time. Learning was primarily based on teaching during clinical care of patients while training time varied between programs. No directors were trained in curriculum development, but most (9/11 respondents) expressed interest in additional education if time was allotted for this task. Even with these challenges, respondents had few problems originating fellowship programs.
Conclusions
Liver transplant anesthesia fellowships had few common educational management processes that allowed for meaningful comparison of educational products between centers. This suggests that trainees are likely to have a wide variability in knowledge and skills that can affect the quality of care delivered. We suggest that national support for fellowship training may help to promote a more ordered yet flexible process at training programs that will improve subsequent patient care.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored.
Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include:
Immunology and immunosuppression;
Patient preparation;
Social, ethical, and psychological issues;
Complications, short- and long-term results;
Artificial organs;
Donation and preservation of organ and tissue;
Translational studies;
Advances in tissue typing;
Updates on transplant pathology;.
Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries.
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.