Madeline C. Addis, Lydia Allison, VeeAnder Mealing, Anna G. Williams, Anne Marie Mozrall, Amy E. Landis
{"title":"Global Material Flow of Macro- and Microplastics to Support a Circular Economy","authors":"Madeline C. Addis, Lydia Allison, VeeAnder Mealing, Anna G. Williams, Anne Marie Mozrall, Amy E. Landis","doi":"10.1002/amp2.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Plastics are one of the most widely consumed materials around the world, and its impact on our ecosystems is undeniable. Initiatives to reduce plastic waste have gained momentum in recent years, but the focus areas of such initiatives do not always align with significant positive impacts. This presentation demonstrates a material flow analysis (MFA) aimed at quantifying the global flow of plastics, from production to end of life, ultimately identifying where plastic reduction efforts can be most impactful. On a global scale, specific data on plastic production and material flow is lacking, so calculations relied heavily on data published in the United Nations' Mapping Global Plastics Report, based on the year 2015. The MFA was conducted with emphasis on end of life and flows lost to the environment, including macro- and microplastics. Across the global MFA, results show packaging was the largest individual industry consumer of plastics. Categories designated as “other” should be investigated further due to their substantial presence in the material flow. Plastics lost to the environment made up about 2% of the total mass, but that 2% equated to over 8 million metric tons. These lost plastics stem from various sources, making the issue difficult to tackle, but addressing this loss is important, nonetheless. Reducing demand for plastic production through decreased use is an obvious approach to minimizing waste and pollution, and this study provides insight about which plastics pose the greatest threat while also identifying current data gaps, ultimately guiding where future efforts should be focused.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":87290,"journal":{"name":"Journal of advanced manufacturing and processing","volume":"7 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/amp2.70015","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of advanced manufacturing and processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/amp2.70015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Plastics are one of the most widely consumed materials around the world, and its impact on our ecosystems is undeniable. Initiatives to reduce plastic waste have gained momentum in recent years, but the focus areas of such initiatives do not always align with significant positive impacts. This presentation demonstrates a material flow analysis (MFA) aimed at quantifying the global flow of plastics, from production to end of life, ultimately identifying where plastic reduction efforts can be most impactful. On a global scale, specific data on plastic production and material flow is lacking, so calculations relied heavily on data published in the United Nations' Mapping Global Plastics Report, based on the year 2015. The MFA was conducted with emphasis on end of life and flows lost to the environment, including macro- and microplastics. Across the global MFA, results show packaging was the largest individual industry consumer of plastics. Categories designated as “other” should be investigated further due to their substantial presence in the material flow. Plastics lost to the environment made up about 2% of the total mass, but that 2% equated to over 8 million metric tons. These lost plastics stem from various sources, making the issue difficult to tackle, but addressing this loss is important, nonetheless. Reducing demand for plastic production through decreased use is an obvious approach to minimizing waste and pollution, and this study provides insight about which plastics pose the greatest threat while also identifying current data gaps, ultimately guiding where future efforts should be focused.
塑料是世界上消费最广泛的材料之一,它对我们生态系统的影响是不可否认的。近年来,减少塑料废物的倡议势头强劲,但这些倡议的重点领域并不总是与重大的积极影响相一致。本演示演示了一种材料流分析(MFA),旨在量化塑料的全球流动,从生产到使用寿命结束,最终确定减少塑料的努力最具影响力的地方。在全球范围内,缺乏关于塑料生产和材料流动的具体数据,因此计算严重依赖于联合国2015年发布的《全球塑料测绘报告》(Mapping global Plastics Report)中的数据。MFA的重点是生命周期结束和流向环境的塑料,包括宏观和微塑料。在全球MFA中,结果显示包装是塑料的最大单个行业消费者。指定为“其他”的类别应进一步调查,因为它们在物料流中大量存在。流失到环境中的塑料约占总质量的2%,但这2%相当于800多万吨。这些丢失的塑料来源各种各样,使得这个问题难以解决,但解决这一损失是很重要的。通过减少使用来减少对塑料生产的需求是减少浪费和污染的一个明显方法,这项研究提供了关于哪些塑料构成最大威胁的见解,同时也确定了当前的数据差距,最终指导了未来的工作重点。