The impact of intensive care strain on patients’ outcomes—a multinational observational cohort (UNITE-COVID) study

IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Katharina Kohler, Thomas De Corte, Massimiliano Greco, Pedro Povoa, Maurizio Cecconi, Marlies Ostermann, Jan De Waele, Andrew Conway Morris
{"title":"The impact of intensive care strain on patients’ outcomes—a multinational observational cohort (UNITE-COVID) study","authors":"Katharina Kohler, Thomas De Corte, Massimiliano Greco, Pedro Povoa, Maurizio Cecconi, Marlies Ostermann, Jan De Waele, Andrew Conway Morris","doi":"10.1186/s13054-025-05521-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intensive care unit (ICU) strain is associated with increased mortality. Most strain metrics focus on ‘simple’ measures such as bed occupancy or admission rates. There is limited data on mitigation strategies, such as procedure teams or staff well-being services on strain, or the impact of increased patient-to-nurse ratios and non-ICU trained nurses working in ICU. Using the multi-national UNITE-COVID study, collecting data from ICUs on their day of peak bed occupancy in two periods (2020 and 2021) of the COVID-19 pandemic, we evaluated metrics of strain (Bed occupancy, patient: nurse ratio, use of non-ICU staff and shortages of consumables) and potential mitigators (procedural support teams and staff well-being interventions). We examined how these related to outcomes (mortality, complications, length of stay). In both epochs, ICUs experienced significant strain, with ICU bed expansion to 133% and 163% respectively, whilst patient-to-nurse ratios increased by 0.4 and 0.3. Consumable shortages were widespread in 2020. Mortality was inversely correlated with staff well-being interventions in both epochs. Complications were inversely correlated with procedure support teams, and positively correlated with staffing ratios. In regression models, pressure sores were reduced in presence of support teams (p = 0.004) and increased with increasing patients per nurse (p = 0.05) whilst unplanned extubations were related to non-ICU trained staff working in ICU(p = 0.02). COVID-19 induced ICU strain had effects beyond mortality, including increases in complications. Staff pressure and lack of ICU training were related to specific complications, whilst support teams and well-being interventions were associated with improved outcomes.","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05521-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intensive care unit (ICU) strain is associated with increased mortality. Most strain metrics focus on ‘simple’ measures such as bed occupancy or admission rates. There is limited data on mitigation strategies, such as procedure teams or staff well-being services on strain, or the impact of increased patient-to-nurse ratios and non-ICU trained nurses working in ICU. Using the multi-national UNITE-COVID study, collecting data from ICUs on their day of peak bed occupancy in two periods (2020 and 2021) of the COVID-19 pandemic, we evaluated metrics of strain (Bed occupancy, patient: nurse ratio, use of non-ICU staff and shortages of consumables) and potential mitigators (procedural support teams and staff well-being interventions). We examined how these related to outcomes (mortality, complications, length of stay). In both epochs, ICUs experienced significant strain, with ICU bed expansion to 133% and 163% respectively, whilst patient-to-nurse ratios increased by 0.4 and 0.3. Consumable shortages were widespread in 2020. Mortality was inversely correlated with staff well-being interventions in both epochs. Complications were inversely correlated with procedure support teams, and positively correlated with staffing ratios. In regression models, pressure sores were reduced in presence of support teams (p = 0.004) and increased with increasing patients per nurse (p = 0.05) whilst unplanned extubations were related to non-ICU trained staff working in ICU(p = 0.02). COVID-19 induced ICU strain had effects beyond mortality, including increases in complications. Staff pressure and lack of ICU training were related to specific complications, whilst support teams and well-being interventions were associated with improved outcomes.
重症监护应变对患者预后的影响——一项多国观察队列研究(UNITE-COVID
重症监护病房(ICU)菌株与死亡率增加有关。大多数应变指标关注于“简单”的指标,如床位占用率或入院率。关于缓解策略的数据有限,例如程序团队或工作人员对压力的福利服务,或增加的患者与护士比例和在ICU工作的非ICU培训护士的影响。利用多国联合COVID-19研究,我们收集了COVID-19大流行两个时期(2020年和2021年)icu床位占用高峰日的数据,评估了应变指标(床位占用、患者:护士比例、非icu工作人员的使用和耗材短缺)和潜在缓解措施(程序支持团队和工作人员福祉干预)。我们研究了这些因素与结果(死亡率、并发症、住院时间)的关系。在这两个时期,ICU都经历了明显的压力,ICU床位分别增加了133%和163%,而患者与护士的比例分别增加了0.4和0.3。2020年,耗材短缺普遍存在。在这两个时期,死亡率与员工福利干预呈负相关。并发症与手术支持团队负相关,与人员配备比例正相关。在回归模型中,支持团队在场时压疮减少(p = 0.004),并且随着每名护士患者的增加而增加(p = 0.05),而计划外拔管与在ICU工作的非ICU培训人员有关(p = 0.02)。COVID-19引起的ICU菌株的影响不仅限于死亡率,还包括并发症的增加。工作人员压力和缺乏ICU培训与特定并发症有关,而支持团队和福祉干预与改善结果有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care
Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
20.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
348
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care is an esteemed international medical journal that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain its high quality standards. Its primary objective is to enhance the healthcare services offered to critically ill patients. To achieve this, the journal focuses on gathering, exchanging, disseminating, and endorsing evidence-based information that is highly relevant to intensivists. By doing so, Critical Care seeks to provide a thorough and inclusive examination of the intensive care field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信