Evaluation of the impact of artificial intelligence-assisted image interpretation on the diagnostic performance of clinicians in identifying endotracheal tube position on plain chest X-ray: a multi-case multi-reader study
Alex Novak, Sarim Ather, Abdala T. Espinosa Morgado, Giles Maskell, Gordon W. Cowell, Douglas Black, Akshay Shah, James S. Bowness, Amied Shadmaan, Claire Bloomfield, Jason L. Oke, Hilal Johnson, Mark Beggs, Fergus Gleeson, Peter Aylward, Aqib Hafeez, Moustafa Elramlawy, Kin Lam, Benjamin Griffiths, Mirae Harford, Louise Aaron, Claire Seeley, Matthew Luney, James Kirkland, Louise Wing, Zahi Qamhawi, Indrajeet Mandal, Thomas Millard, Michelle Chimbani, Athirah Sharazi, Emma Bryant, Wendy Haithwaite, Aurora Medonica
{"title":"Evaluation of the impact of artificial intelligence-assisted image interpretation on the diagnostic performance of clinicians in identifying endotracheal tube position on plain chest X-ray: a multi-case multi-reader study","authors":"Alex Novak, Sarim Ather, Abdala T. Espinosa Morgado, Giles Maskell, Gordon W. Cowell, Douglas Black, Akshay Shah, James S. Bowness, Amied Shadmaan, Claire Bloomfield, Jason L. Oke, Hilal Johnson, Mark Beggs, Fergus Gleeson, Peter Aylward, Aqib Hafeez, Moustafa Elramlawy, Kin Lam, Benjamin Griffiths, Mirae Harford, Louise Aaron, Claire Seeley, Matthew Luney, James Kirkland, Louise Wing, Zahi Qamhawi, Indrajeet Mandal, Thomas Millard, Michelle Chimbani, Athirah Sharazi, Emma Bryant, Wendy Haithwaite, Aurora Medonica","doi":"10.1186/s13054-025-05566-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Incorrectly placed endotracheal tubes (ETTs) can lead to serious clinical harm. Studies have demonstrated the potential for artificial intelligence (AI)-led algorithms to detect ETT placement on chest X-Ray (CXR) images, however their effect on clinician accuracy remains unexplored. This study measured the impact of an AI-assisted ETT detection algorithm on the ability of clinical staff to correctly identify ETT misplacement on CXR images. Four hundred CXRs of intubated adult patients were retrospectively sourced from the John Radcliffe Hospital (Oxford) and two other UK NHS hospitals. Images were de-identified and selected from a range of clinical settings, including the intensive care unit (ICU) and emergency department (ED). Each image was independently reported by a panel of thoracic radiologists, whose consensus classification of ETT placement (correct, too low [distal], or too high [proximal]) served as the reference standard for the study. Correct ETT position was defined as the tip located 3–7 cm above the carina, in line with established guidelines. Eighteen clinical readers of varying seniority from six clinical specialties were recruited across four NHS hospitals. Readers viewed the dataset using an online platform and recorded a blinded classification of ETT position for each image. After a four-week washout period, this was repeated with assistance from an AI-assisted image interpretation tool. Reader accuracy, reported confidence, and timings were measured during each study phase. 14,400 image interpretations were undertaken. Pooled accuracy for tube placement classification improved from 73.6 to 77.4% (p = 0.002). Accuracy for identification of critically misplaced tubes increased from 79.3 to 89.0% (p = 0.001). Reader confidence improved with AI assistance, with no change in mean interpretation time at 36 s per image. Use of assistive AI technology improved accuracy and confidence in interpreting ETT placement on CXR, especially for identification of critically misplaced tubes. AI assistance may potentially provide a useful adjunct to support clinicians in identifying misplaced ETTs on CXR.","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05566-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Incorrectly placed endotracheal tubes (ETTs) can lead to serious clinical harm. Studies have demonstrated the potential for artificial intelligence (AI)-led algorithms to detect ETT placement on chest X-Ray (CXR) images, however their effect on clinician accuracy remains unexplored. This study measured the impact of an AI-assisted ETT detection algorithm on the ability of clinical staff to correctly identify ETT misplacement on CXR images. Four hundred CXRs of intubated adult patients were retrospectively sourced from the John Radcliffe Hospital (Oxford) and two other UK NHS hospitals. Images were de-identified and selected from a range of clinical settings, including the intensive care unit (ICU) and emergency department (ED). Each image was independently reported by a panel of thoracic radiologists, whose consensus classification of ETT placement (correct, too low [distal], or too high [proximal]) served as the reference standard for the study. Correct ETT position was defined as the tip located 3–7 cm above the carina, in line with established guidelines. Eighteen clinical readers of varying seniority from six clinical specialties were recruited across four NHS hospitals. Readers viewed the dataset using an online platform and recorded a blinded classification of ETT position for each image. After a four-week washout period, this was repeated with assistance from an AI-assisted image interpretation tool. Reader accuracy, reported confidence, and timings were measured during each study phase. 14,400 image interpretations were undertaken. Pooled accuracy for tube placement classification improved from 73.6 to 77.4% (p = 0.002). Accuracy for identification of critically misplaced tubes increased from 79.3 to 89.0% (p = 0.001). Reader confidence improved with AI assistance, with no change in mean interpretation time at 36 s per image. Use of assistive AI technology improved accuracy and confidence in interpreting ETT placement on CXR, especially for identification of critically misplaced tubes. AI assistance may potentially provide a useful adjunct to support clinicians in identifying misplaced ETTs on CXR.
期刊介绍:
Critical Care is an esteemed international medical journal that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain its high quality standards. Its primary objective is to enhance the healthcare services offered to critically ill patients. To achieve this, the journal focuses on gathering, exchanging, disseminating, and endorsing evidence-based information that is highly relevant to intensivists. By doing so, Critical Care seeks to provide a thorough and inclusive examination of the intensive care field.