Is there a difference in textbook outcomes of emergency cholecystectomy in older patients compared with younger patients?

IF 5.8 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Yasir Musa Kesgin, Ahmet Zahit Kaan, Metehan Arslan, Yusuf Bilgin, Erkan Somuncu, Serhan Yılmaz, Ali Kocataş
{"title":"Is there a difference in textbook outcomes of emergency cholecystectomy in older patients compared with younger patients?","authors":"Yasir Musa Kesgin, Ahmet Zahit Kaan, Metehan Arslan, Yusuf Bilgin, Erkan Somuncu, Serhan Yılmaz, Ali Kocataş","doi":"10.1186/s13017-025-00610-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Textbook outcome (TO) is a concept that describes achieving an uneventful course for a patient undergoing surgery. It was first described for colorectal surgery and is now increasingly linked to various topics of surgical literature. After the S.P.Ri.M.A.C.C. Study, the authors applied the concept to emergency cholecystectomies. In this study, we aimed to question whether being an older patient commands a difference in textbook outcome rates. All patients undergoing emergency cholecystectomy in a single tertiary hospital between 2020 and 2024 were included in this study. The TO criteria included no 30-day mortality, no 30-day postoperative complications, no readmission within 30 days, a hospital stay of ≤ 7 days and complete laparoscopic surgery. Group A included patients younger than 65 years and the others comprised group B. The study was conducted with 212 patients, of whom 123 (58%) were female. Conversion to open and subtotal cholecystectomy were similar between groups. The textbook outcome rate was 88% in the younger group and 72% in the elderly patients (p = 0.040). However, multivariate logistic regression analyses did not support age as a significant factor in textbook outcome. Length of hospital stay (> 7 days) and postoperative complications were determined to be reasons for not achieving the textbook outcome. The textbook outcome rate in older patients was not similar to that in younger patients. Surgical and non-surgical causes should be highlighted. Risk stratification remains important in the management of acute cholecystitis. Larger studies with patient-centred data are needed to improve the concept.","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"708 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-025-00610-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Textbook outcome (TO) is a concept that describes achieving an uneventful course for a patient undergoing surgery. It was first described for colorectal surgery and is now increasingly linked to various topics of surgical literature. After the S.P.Ri.M.A.C.C. Study, the authors applied the concept to emergency cholecystectomies. In this study, we aimed to question whether being an older patient commands a difference in textbook outcome rates. All patients undergoing emergency cholecystectomy in a single tertiary hospital between 2020 and 2024 were included in this study. The TO criteria included no 30-day mortality, no 30-day postoperative complications, no readmission within 30 days, a hospital stay of ≤ 7 days and complete laparoscopic surgery. Group A included patients younger than 65 years and the others comprised group B. The study was conducted with 212 patients, of whom 123 (58%) were female. Conversion to open and subtotal cholecystectomy were similar between groups. The textbook outcome rate was 88% in the younger group and 72% in the elderly patients (p = 0.040). However, multivariate logistic regression analyses did not support age as a significant factor in textbook outcome. Length of hospital stay (> 7 days) and postoperative complications were determined to be reasons for not achieving the textbook outcome. The textbook outcome rate in older patients was not similar to that in younger patients. Surgical and non-surgical causes should be highlighted. Risk stratification remains important in the management of acute cholecystitis. Larger studies with patient-centred data are needed to improve the concept.
老年患者急诊胆囊切除术的预后与年轻患者相比有差异吗?
教科书结果(TO)是一个概念,描述了在接受手术的患者中实现平稳的过程。它最初被描述为结直肠手术,现在越来越多地与外科文献的各种主题联系在一起。在s.p.r.m.a.c.c之后。研究中,作者将这一概念应用于急诊胆囊切除术。在这项研究中,我们的目的是质疑年龄较大的患者是否会导致教科书结局率的差异。本研究纳入了2020年至2024年间在一家三级医院接受急诊胆囊切除术的所有患者。TO标准包括无30天死亡率、无术后30天并发症、30天内无再入院、住院时间≤7天、完成腹腔镜手术。A组为年龄小于65岁的患者,b组为年龄小于65岁的患者。研究共纳入212例患者,其中123例(58%)为女性。两组间转开腹和次全胆囊切除术相似。青年组的教科书结局率为88%,老年组为72% (p = 0.040)。然而,多变量逻辑回归分析不支持年龄作为教科书结果的重要因素。住院时间(bbb7天)和术后并发症被确定为未能达到教科书结果的原因。老年患者的教科书结局率与年轻患者不相似。应强调手术和非手术原因。危险分层在急性胆囊炎的治疗中仍然很重要。需要更大规模的以患者为中心的研究来改进这一概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Emergency Surgery
World Journal of Emergency Surgery EMERGENCY MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The World Journal of Emergency Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal covering all facets of clinical and basic research in traumatic and non-traumatic emergency surgery and related fields. Topics include emergency surgery, acute care surgery, trauma surgery, intensive care, trauma management, and resuscitation, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信