Feasibility, Acceptability, and Tolerability of Fully-Immersive Virtual Reality Use Among Individuals with Neurological Conditions: A Mixed Methods Study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Daniel Stam, Molly Watkins, Brea Galyen, Mitchell Olson, Kaitlyn Vomhof
{"title":"Feasibility, Acceptability, and Tolerability of Fully-Immersive Virtual Reality Use Among Individuals with Neurological Conditions: A Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Daniel Stam, Molly Watkins, Brea Galyen, Mitchell Olson, Kaitlyn Vomhof","doi":"10.1177/2161783X251361941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Virtual reality (VR) offers a multidimensional simulated reality built with digital formats and can be characterized as semi-immersive (single projection screen) or fully-immersive (head-mounted display). Although VR is an emerging intervention for the rehabilitation of individuals with neurological disorders, research on fully-immersive technologies and the patient experience is limited. <b><i>Purpose:</i></b> To evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and tolerability of using off-the-shelf, fully-immersive VR with adults following neurological impairment. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Mixed-methods study including 18 participants with a mean standard deviation (SD) age of 67.11 (12.12) years, asked to complete 20 minutes of dynamic rhythm-based VR activity in sitting. Outcomes included the pre- and postactivity VR Sickness Questionnaire (VRSQ), physiological data (maximum heart rate and Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion [RPE]), the User Satisfaction Evaluation Questionnaire (USEQ), and a structured interview. Quantitative analysis consisted of descriptive and inferential statistics. VRSQ scores were compared using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Qualitative analysis consisted of thematic analysis of interviews. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Median interquartile range (IQR) pre- and postactivity VRSQ scores were 7.50 (0-19.58) and 7.92 (0-19.38), respectively. Differences in scores were not statistically significant (Z = 0, <i>P</i> = 1.00). The median USEQ score was 27.50 (25.00-28.25). The mean percentage of maximal heart rate achieved was 63 (10) %, with a median RPE score of 10.50 (8.25-12.75). Qualitative analysis revealed themes of enjoyment and beneficial therapeutic challenges as facilitators of VR use. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> A single session of fully-immersive off-the-shelf VR yielded promising integrated findings related to the feasibility, acceptability, and tolerability of this type of intervention for a sample of individuals with a variety of neurological conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47401,"journal":{"name":"Games for Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Games for Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2161783X251361941","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Virtual reality (VR) offers a multidimensional simulated reality built with digital formats and can be characterized as semi-immersive (single projection screen) or fully-immersive (head-mounted display). Although VR is an emerging intervention for the rehabilitation of individuals with neurological disorders, research on fully-immersive technologies and the patient experience is limited. Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and tolerability of using off-the-shelf, fully-immersive VR with adults following neurological impairment. Methods: Mixed-methods study including 18 participants with a mean standard deviation (SD) age of 67.11 (12.12) years, asked to complete 20 minutes of dynamic rhythm-based VR activity in sitting. Outcomes included the pre- and postactivity VR Sickness Questionnaire (VRSQ), physiological data (maximum heart rate and Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion [RPE]), the User Satisfaction Evaluation Questionnaire (USEQ), and a structured interview. Quantitative analysis consisted of descriptive and inferential statistics. VRSQ scores were compared using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Qualitative analysis consisted of thematic analysis of interviews. Results: Median interquartile range (IQR) pre- and postactivity VRSQ scores were 7.50 (0-19.58) and 7.92 (0-19.38), respectively. Differences in scores were not statistically significant (Z = 0, P = 1.00). The median USEQ score was 27.50 (25.00-28.25). The mean percentage of maximal heart rate achieved was 63 (10) %, with a median RPE score of 10.50 (8.25-12.75). Qualitative analysis revealed themes of enjoyment and beneficial therapeutic challenges as facilitators of VR use. Conclusion: A single session of fully-immersive off-the-shelf VR yielded promising integrated findings related to the feasibility, acceptability, and tolerability of this type of intervention for a sample of individuals with a variety of neurological conditions.

可行性,可接受性,以及在神经系统疾病患者中使用完全沉浸式虚拟现实的耐受性:一项混合方法研究。
简介:虚拟现实(VR)提供了一种基于数字格式构建的多维模拟现实,可以分为半沉浸式(单投影屏幕)或完全沉浸式(头戴式显示器)。尽管VR是一种新兴的神经系统疾病患者康复干预手段,但对完全沉浸式技术和患者体验的研究仍然有限。目的:评估成人神经损伤后使用现成的全沉浸式VR的可行性、可接受性和耐受性。方法:混合方法研究包括18名平均标准偏差(SD)年龄67.11(12.12)岁的参与者,要求他们在坐着的情况下完成20分钟基于动态节奏的VR活动。结果包括活动前和活动后虚拟现实疾病问卷(VRSQ)、生理数据(最大心率和感知运动博格评分[RPE])、用户满意度评估问卷(USEQ)和结构化访谈。定量分析包括描述性统计和推断性统计。VRSQ得分采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行比较。定性分析包括访谈的专题分析。结果:活动前后VRSQ评分中位数四分位数范围(IQR)分别为7.50(0-19.58)和7.92(0-19.38)。两组评分差异无统计学意义(Z = 0, P = 1.00)。USEQ得分中位数为27.50(25.00-28.25)。最大心率达到的平均百分比为63(10)%,中位RPE评分为10.50(8.25-12.75)。定性分析揭示了作为虚拟现实使用促进者的享受主题和有益的治疗挑战。结论:单次完全沉浸式的现成VR产生了与这种类型的干预的可行性、可接受性和耐受性相关的有希望的综合发现,适用于具有各种神经系统疾病的个体样本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
11.40%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Games for Health Journal is the first peer-reviewed journal dedicated to advancing the impact of game research, technologies, and applications on human health and well-being. This ground-breaking publication delivers original research that directly impacts this emerging, widely-recognized, and increasingly adopted area of healthcare. Games are rapidly becoming an important tool for improving health behaviors ranging from healthy lifestyle habits and behavior modification, to self-management of illness and chronic conditions to motivating and supporting physical activity. Games are also increasingly used to train healthcare professionals in methods for diagnosis, medical procedures, patient monitoring, as well as for responding to epidemics and natural disasters. Games for Health Journal is a must for anyone interested in the research and design of health games that integrate well-tested, evidence-based behavioral health strategies to help improve health behaviors and to support the delivery of care. Games for Health Journal coverage includes: -Nutrition, weight management, obesity -Disease prevention, self-management, and adherence -Cognitive, mental, emotional, and behavioral health -Games in home-to-clinic telehealth systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信