De-Risking Seizure Liability: Integrating Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs), New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) and In Silico Approaches while Highlighting Knowledge Gaps.

Abstract

Animal studies are commonly used in drug development, chemical, and environmental toxicology to predict human toxicity, but their reliability, particularly in the central nervous system (CNS) is limited. For example, animal models often fail to predict drug-induced seizures, leading to unforeseen convulsions in clinical trials. Evaluating environmental compounds, such as pesticides, also poses challenges due to time and resource constraints, resulting in compounds remaining untested. To address these limitations, a government-industry collaboration identified 25 biological target families linked to seizure mechanisms by combining key events from adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) with drug discovery data. Over a hundred vitro assay endpoints were identified, covering 24 of the target families, including neurotransmitter receptors, transporters, and voltage-gated calcium channels. A review of reference compounds identified 196 seizure-inducing and 34 seizure-negative chemicals revealed that fewer than 30% of the targets had been tested, highlighting significant data gaps. This proof-of-concept study demonstrates how mechanistic seizure liability can be assessed using an AOP framework and in vitro data. It underscores the need for expanded screening panels to include additional seizure-relevant targets. By integrating mechanistic insights into early drug development and environmental risk assessment, this approach enhances compound prioritization, complements animal studies, and optimizes resource use. Ultimately, this strategy refines CNS safety evaluation in drug development, improves public health protection to neurotoxicants, and bridges knowledge gaps.