Phenotypes of patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis presenting for non-operative care: Baseline data from The Lumbar Stenosis Prognostic Subgroups for Personalizing Care and Treatment (PROSPECTS) Study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-07-25 DOI:10.1093/pm/pnaf099
Sean D Rundell, Eric N Meier, Jeffrey G Jarvik, Janna L Friedly, Maggie E Horn, Pradeep Suri, Amy M Cizik, Patrick J Heagerty, Sandra K Johnston, Rebecca Fillipo, Colleen Burke, Stephanie T Danyluk, Kelley Seebeck, Adam P Goode
{"title":"Phenotypes of patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis presenting for non-operative care: Baseline data from The Lumbar Stenosis Prognostic Subgroups for Personalizing Care and Treatment (PROSPECTS) Study.","authors":"Sean D Rundell, Eric N Meier, Jeffrey G Jarvik, Janna L Friedly, Maggie E Horn, Pradeep Suri, Amy M Cizik, Patrick J Heagerty, Sandra K Johnston, Rebecca Fillipo, Colleen Burke, Stephanie T Danyluk, Kelley Seebeck, Adam P Goode","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnaf099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study describes the enrollment and baseline characteristics of participants in the PROSPECTS cohort and explores subgroups of patients presenting for non-operative care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting and subjects: </strong>We enrolled adults ≥50 years initiating non-operative care for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis. We excluded those with serious spinal pathology, conditions limiting ambulation, and prior or planned lumbar surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected demographics, the PROMIS-29, pain intensity, Oswestry Disability Index, Swiss Spinals Stenosis Questionnaire, chronicity of symptoms, pain sites, comorbidities, falls, and opioid use. We used descriptive statistics to characterize the sample and Latent Class Analysis (LCA) to derive subgroups with distinct phenotypes. The best model was selected based on model fit statistics, class separation, and clinical interpretability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 598 participants. The mean age was 67 (SD = 9), and 61% were female. Back and leg pain were present for ≥1 year for 65% of participants. Multiple pain sites were common, mean of 4.3 sites (SD = 2.2), and a majority of patients had multiple comorbidities (54%). We selected a four-class solution as the best model from the LCA. These phenotypes were described as 1) \"high pain impact, low psychosocial features\" n = 233 (39%), 2) \"mild pain impact, low psychosocial features\" n = 218 (36%), 3) \"high pain impact, complex health needs\" n = 95 (16%), and 4) \"acute, intermittent, moderate-severe leg pain with high pain impact\" n = 52 (9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These phenotypes reflect distinct profiles which may inform health needs and patient-centered care. Future studies should examine longitudinal outcomes to establish their clinical utility and prognostic value.</p>","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf099","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study describes the enrollment and baseline characteristics of participants in the PROSPECTS cohort and explores subgroups of patients presenting for non-operative care.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting and subjects: We enrolled adults ≥50 years initiating non-operative care for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis. We excluded those with serious spinal pathology, conditions limiting ambulation, and prior or planned lumbar surgery.

Methods: We collected demographics, the PROMIS-29, pain intensity, Oswestry Disability Index, Swiss Spinals Stenosis Questionnaire, chronicity of symptoms, pain sites, comorbidities, falls, and opioid use. We used descriptive statistics to characterize the sample and Latent Class Analysis (LCA) to derive subgroups with distinct phenotypes. The best model was selected based on model fit statistics, class separation, and clinical interpretability.

Results: We enrolled 598 participants. The mean age was 67 (SD = 9), and 61% were female. Back and leg pain were present for ≥1 year for 65% of participants. Multiple pain sites were common, mean of 4.3 sites (SD = 2.2), and a majority of patients had multiple comorbidities (54%). We selected a four-class solution as the best model from the LCA. These phenotypes were described as 1) "high pain impact, low psychosocial features" n = 233 (39%), 2) "mild pain impact, low psychosocial features" n = 218 (36%), 3) "high pain impact, complex health needs" n = 95 (16%), and 4) "acute, intermittent, moderate-severe leg pain with high pain impact" n = 52 (9%).

Conclusions: These phenotypes reflect distinct profiles which may inform health needs and patient-centered care. Future studies should examine longitudinal outcomes to establish their clinical utility and prognostic value.

非手术治疗的症状性腰椎管狭窄患者的表型:腰椎管狭窄个性化护理和治疗预后亚组(前景)研究的基线数据。
目的:本研究描述了prospect队列参与者的入组和基线特征,并探讨了接受非手术治疗的患者亚组。设计:横断面研究。环境和受试者:我们招募了年龄≥50岁的成年人,他们开始对症状性腰椎管狭窄进行非手术治疗。我们排除了那些有严重的脊柱病理,限制活动的情况,以及之前或计划进行腰椎手术的患者。方法:我们收集了人口统计数据、疼痛强度、Oswestry残疾指数、瑞士脊柱狭窄问卷、症状的慢性性、疼痛部位、合并症、跌倒和阿片类药物的使用。我们使用描述性统计来描述样本的特征,并使用潜在类分析(LCA)来推导具有不同表型的亚组。根据模型拟合统计、分类分离和临床可解释性选择最佳模型。结果:我们招募了598名参与者。平均年龄67岁(SD = 9), 61%为女性。65%的参与者存在背痛和腿部疼痛≥1年。多发疼痛部位较为常见,平均4.3个(SD = 2.2),多数患者有多发合并症(54%)。我们从LCA中选择了一个四类解决方案作为最佳模型。这些表型被描述为1)“高疼痛影响,低心理社会特征”n = 233 (39%), 2)“轻度疼痛影响,低心理社会特征”n = 218 (36%), 3)“高疼痛影响,复杂的健康需求”n = 95(16%)和4)“急性、间歇性、中重度腿痛伴高疼痛影响”n = 52(9%)。结论:这些表型反映了不同的特征,可能为健康需求和以患者为中心的护理提供信息。未来的研究应检查纵向结果,以确定其临床应用和预后价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Medicine
Pain Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
187
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Pain Medicine is a multi-disciplinary journal dedicated to pain clinicians, educators and researchers with an interest in pain from various medical specialties such as pain medicine, anaesthesiology, family practice, internal medicine, neurology, neurological surgery, orthopaedic spine surgery, psychiatry, and rehabilitation medicine as well as related health disciplines such as psychology, neuroscience, nursing, nurse practitioner, physical therapy, and integrative health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信