Biobehavioral Phenotypes of Chronic Low Back Pain: Psychosocial Subgroup Identification Using Latent Profile Analysis.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-07-25 DOI:10.1093/pm/pnaf095
Fatemeh Gholi Zadeh Kharrat, Prakruthi Amar Kumar, Wolf Mehling, Irina Strigo, Jeffrey Lotz, Thomas A Peterson
{"title":"Biobehavioral Phenotypes of Chronic Low Back Pain: Psychosocial Subgroup Identification Using Latent Profile Analysis.","authors":"Fatemeh Gholi Zadeh Kharrat, Prakruthi Amar Kumar, Wolf Mehling, Irina Strigo, Jeffrey Lotz, Thomas A Peterson","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnaf095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study identifies distinct biobehavioral phenotypes among patients with chronic low back pain (cLBP) using Latent Profile Analysis (LPA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>These phenotypes were derived from baseline data from two cohorts within the NIH HEAL BACPAC consortium: BACKHOME, a large nationwide e-cohort (N = 3,025) utilized for model training, and COMEBACK as external test set, a deep phenotyping cohort (N = 450) utilized for generalization. The analysis incorporated variables including pain characteristics, psychosocial factors, lifestyle habits, and social determinants of health. Model fit was optimized via 10-fold cross-validation with 100 bootstraps and evaluated using Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), and Entropy(uncertainty).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four classes were identified: Class 1 (\"High Distress and Maladaptive Behaviors\") displayed high levels of anxiety, depression, and fear avoidance. Class 2 (\"Resilient and Adaptive Coping\") exhibited low maladaptive behaviors and high pain self-efficacy. Class 3 (\"Intermediate Maladaptive Patterns\") represented moderate levels of psychological and behavioral challenges, while Class 4 (\"Emotionally Regulated with High Pain Burden\") demonstrated strong emotional regulation despite significant pain burden. Class sizes were 701, 413, 893, and 947 for the train set, and 127, 108, 95, and 68 for the test set, respectively. Fit metrics supported the model's performance and generalizability (BACKHOME (train set): AIC = 77,792, BIC = 78,338, Entropy = 0.82; COMEBACK(test set): AIC = 72,437, BIC = 73,880, Entropy = 0.81). Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between classes (p < 0.05) in key variables such as pain self-efficacy, fear avoidance, and emotional awareness, and changes in pain severity and health-related quality of life over time (p ≤ 0.001), indicating clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings highlight the heterogeneity of cLBP and suggest that tailored treatments targeting these distinct subgroups could improve clinical outcomes. This work advances our understanding of cLBP by providing a robust framework for identifying patient subgroups based on biobehavioral characteristics. Results underscore the value of LPA in uncovering clinically meaningful patterns in complex conditions like cLBP, paving the way for more personalized treatment approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf095","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study identifies distinct biobehavioral phenotypes among patients with chronic low back pain (cLBP) using Latent Profile Analysis (LPA).

Methods: These phenotypes were derived from baseline data from two cohorts within the NIH HEAL BACPAC consortium: BACKHOME, a large nationwide e-cohort (N = 3,025) utilized for model training, and COMEBACK as external test set, a deep phenotyping cohort (N = 450) utilized for generalization. The analysis incorporated variables including pain characteristics, psychosocial factors, lifestyle habits, and social determinants of health. Model fit was optimized via 10-fold cross-validation with 100 bootstraps and evaluated using Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), and Entropy(uncertainty).

Results: Four classes were identified: Class 1 ("High Distress and Maladaptive Behaviors") displayed high levels of anxiety, depression, and fear avoidance. Class 2 ("Resilient and Adaptive Coping") exhibited low maladaptive behaviors and high pain self-efficacy. Class 3 ("Intermediate Maladaptive Patterns") represented moderate levels of psychological and behavioral challenges, while Class 4 ("Emotionally Regulated with High Pain Burden") demonstrated strong emotional regulation despite significant pain burden. Class sizes were 701, 413, 893, and 947 for the train set, and 127, 108, 95, and 68 for the test set, respectively. Fit metrics supported the model's performance and generalizability (BACKHOME (train set): AIC = 77,792, BIC = 78,338, Entropy = 0.82; COMEBACK(test set): AIC = 72,437, BIC = 73,880, Entropy = 0.81). Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between classes (p < 0.05) in key variables such as pain self-efficacy, fear avoidance, and emotional awareness, and changes in pain severity and health-related quality of life over time (p ≤ 0.001), indicating clinical utility.

Conclusions: Our findings highlight the heterogeneity of cLBP and suggest that tailored treatments targeting these distinct subgroups could improve clinical outcomes. This work advances our understanding of cLBP by providing a robust framework for identifying patient subgroups based on biobehavioral characteristics. Results underscore the value of LPA in uncovering clinically meaningful patterns in complex conditions like cLBP, paving the way for more personalized treatment approaches.

慢性腰痛的生物行为表型:使用潜在剖面分析的社会心理亚群识别。
目的:本研究利用潜在特征分析(LPA)识别慢性腰痛(cLBP)患者的不同生物行为表型。方法:这些表型来自NIH HEAL BACPAC联盟的两个队列的基线数据:BACKHOME,一个大型的全国电子队列(N = 3025)用于模型训练,以及COMEBACK作为外部测试集,一个深度表型队列(N = 450)用于泛化。分析纳入的变量包括疼痛特征、社会心理因素、生活习惯和健康的社会决定因素。通过100次自助10倍交叉验证优化模型拟合,并使用赤池信息准则(AIC)、贝叶斯信息准则(BIC)和熵(不确定性)进行评估。结果:分为四类:第一类(“高度痛苦和适应不良行为”)表现出高度的焦虑、抑郁和恐惧回避。第二类(“弹性和适应性应对”)表现出低适应不良行为和高疼痛自我效能。第3类(“中度适应不良模式”)表现为中等程度的心理和行为挑战,而第4类(“高疼痛负担的情绪调节”)表现出强烈的情绪调节,尽管有显著的疼痛负担。训练集的类大小分别为701、413、893和947,测试集的类大小分别为127、108、95和68。拟合指标支持模型的性能和泛化性(BACKHOME(训练集):AIC = 77,792, BIC = 78,338,熵= 0.82;回归(测试集):AIC = 72,437, BIC = 73,880,熵= 0.81)。结论:我们的研究结果强调了cLBP的异质性,并表明针对这些不同亚组的量身定制治疗可以改善临床结果。这项工作通过提供一个基于生物行为特征识别患者亚组的强大框架,促进了我们对cLBP的理解。结果强调了LPA在揭示cLBP等复杂疾病的临床意义模式方面的价值,为更个性化的治疗方法铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Medicine
Pain Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
187
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Pain Medicine is a multi-disciplinary journal dedicated to pain clinicians, educators and researchers with an interest in pain from various medical specialties such as pain medicine, anaesthesiology, family practice, internal medicine, neurology, neurological surgery, orthopaedic spine surgery, psychiatry, and rehabilitation medicine as well as related health disciplines such as psychology, neuroscience, nursing, nurse practitioner, physical therapy, and integrative health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信