Bridging the gap: from standards to reality in wheelchair headrest-backrest design: a case study.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Benjamin Aveyard, William Dauncey, Jacob Redwood-Thomas, Dominic Eggbeer, Russell Penman, Lorna Tasker
{"title":"Bridging the gap: from standards to reality in wheelchair headrest-backrest design: a case study.","authors":"Benjamin Aveyard, William Dauncey, Jacob Redwood-Thomas, Dominic Eggbeer, Russell Penman, Lorna Tasker","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2025.2532704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>: A barrier to the design, manufacture, prescription, testing and evaluation of postural support devices is the lack of user interface force data available. This is in part due to the lack of instrumentation suitable for data collection. This work attempts to address the need for practical instrumentation and record force data.</p><p><p><b>Methods</b>: Instrumentation was developed and used to record real-world unidirectional force data from an individual with high-strength extensor patterns. This data was then used to undertake comparative testing of a custom-made backrest shell using methods described in ISO 16840-3: Wheelchair seating - Part 3: Determination of static, impact and repetitive load strengths for postural support devices.</p><p><p><b>Results</b>: Data collected had a higher magnitude and frequency force than comparative testing forces. This led to a pass and a fail respectively, of the original ISO 16840-3 test and the real-world informed parameters.</p><p><p><b>Conclusion</b>: The data collected highlights the need for better understanding of forces exerted by users on the PSDs. This is especially true of users with complex conditions, behaviours and postures that may exert forces outside of the norm. Developing the correct instrumentation and centring users experiences to inform testing, design and manufacture, prescription of devices and technology evaluations is key to this process.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2532704","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: A barrier to the design, manufacture, prescription, testing and evaluation of postural support devices is the lack of user interface force data available. This is in part due to the lack of instrumentation suitable for data collection. This work attempts to address the need for practical instrumentation and record force data.

Methods: Instrumentation was developed and used to record real-world unidirectional force data from an individual with high-strength extensor patterns. This data was then used to undertake comparative testing of a custom-made backrest shell using methods described in ISO 16840-3: Wheelchair seating - Part 3: Determination of static, impact and repetitive load strengths for postural support devices.

Results: Data collected had a higher magnitude and frequency force than comparative testing forces. This led to a pass and a fail respectively, of the original ISO 16840-3 test and the real-world informed parameters.

Conclusion: The data collected highlights the need for better understanding of forces exerted by users on the PSDs. This is especially true of users with complex conditions, behaviours and postures that may exert forces outside of the norm. Developing the correct instrumentation and centring users experiences to inform testing, design and manufacture, prescription of devices and technology evaluations is key to this process.

弥合差距:从标准到现实的轮椅头枕-靠背设计:一个案例研究。
目的:缺乏可用的用户界面力数据是设计、制造、处方、测试和评估姿势支撑装置的一个障碍。这在一定程度上是由于缺乏适合数据收集的仪器。这项工作试图解决对实际仪器和记录力数据的需求。方法:开发了仪器,并用于记录具有高强度伸肌模式的个体的真实单向力数据。然后,使用ISO 16840-3:轮椅座椅-第3部分:姿势支撑装置的静态、冲击和重复负荷强度的测定中描述的方法,将这些数据用于定制靠背壳的比较测试。结果:所收集的数据具有比比较试验力更高的幅度和频率力。这导致原始ISO 16840-3测试和真实世界的知情参数分别通过和失败。结论:收集的数据强调需要更好地了解用户对psd施加的力。对于条件复杂、行为和姿势可能会施加超出规范的力量的用户来说尤其如此。开发正确的仪器和集中用户经验,为测试、设计和制造、设备处方和技术评估提供信息,是这一过程的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信