Metabolic syndrome as a modifiable risk factor for complications after epilepsy surgery.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Nikita Das, Akshay Sharma, Jingdi Shen, Maxime Munyeshyaka, Deborah Vegh, William Bingaman, Daniel M Rotroff, Lara Jehi
{"title":"Metabolic syndrome as a modifiable risk factor for complications after epilepsy surgery.","authors":"Nikita Das, Akshay Sharma, Jingdi Shen, Maxime Munyeshyaka, Deborah Vegh, William Bingaman, Daniel M Rotroff, Lara Jehi","doi":"10.3171/2025.4.JNS242862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a growing public health concern in what has been called a \"global epidemic.\" The aim of this study was to investigate how MetS influences postoperative seizure freedom outcomes and complications following elective neurosurgical intervention for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), offering an opportunity to uncover modifiable outcome drivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients with DRE who underwent a first resective epilepsy surgery from 2000 to 2017 were identified retrospectively from a prospectively collected institutional outcomes registry. MetS was defined as having ≥ 3 of 4 diagnostic criteria: obesity, hyperglycemia, hypertension, or dyslipidemia. Patients who met 2 criteria preoperatively (pre-MetS cohort) and patients who met ≥ 3 criteria preoperatively (MetS cohort) were matched with non-MetS patients by using covariates classically linked with surgical outcomes, including age at surgery, sex, epilepsy duration, seizure frequency, prior generalized tonic-clonic seizures, abnormal MRI findings, handedness, surgical type, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Differences in postoperative complications and ICU admissions within 30 days and hospital length of stay (LOS) were analyzed using risk ratios and the average treatment effect (ATE). Differences in postoperative seizure freedom outcomes were quantified using Kaplan-Meier analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Propensity score matching (PSM) achieved a symmetric covariate balance between the pre-MetS and MetS cohorts and their non-MetS counterparts (standardized mean difference after PSM < 0.1 and ≤ 0.25, respectively). Of 1466 patients who underwent surgery for DRE, 441 (30.1%) met ≥ 2 diagnostic criteria (pre-MetS cohort, n = 339; MetS cohort, n = 102). The pre-MetS cohort had higher postoperative complication rates (RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.04-1.52) and longer LOS (ATE 1.02 [SE 0.34], p = 0.01) compared with the matched non-MetS cohort, but did not differ significantly with respect to postoperative ICU admissions (RR 1.59, 95% CI 0.66-3.83). Patients with MetS had a higher risk of postoperative complications (RR 1.99, 95% CI 1.39-2.86) than non-MetS patients, although differences in ICU admission (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.47-3.74) and LOS (ATE 0.72 [SE 0.43], p = 0.20) between groups were insignificant. There were no significant differences in postoperative seizure freedom outcomes between the pre-MetS or MetS cohorts and their non-MetS counterparts (p = 0.52 and p = 0.71, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preoperative MetS could increase the risk of major postoperative morbidity after resective epilepsy surgery. Early identification and management of MetS components could be important for optimizing surgical outcomes for patients with DRE.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.4.JNS242862","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a growing public health concern in what has been called a "global epidemic." The aim of this study was to investigate how MetS influences postoperative seizure freedom outcomes and complications following elective neurosurgical intervention for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), offering an opportunity to uncover modifiable outcome drivers.

Methods: Adult patients with DRE who underwent a first resective epilepsy surgery from 2000 to 2017 were identified retrospectively from a prospectively collected institutional outcomes registry. MetS was defined as having ≥ 3 of 4 diagnostic criteria: obesity, hyperglycemia, hypertension, or dyslipidemia. Patients who met 2 criteria preoperatively (pre-MetS cohort) and patients who met ≥ 3 criteria preoperatively (MetS cohort) were matched with non-MetS patients by using covariates classically linked with surgical outcomes, including age at surgery, sex, epilepsy duration, seizure frequency, prior generalized tonic-clonic seizures, abnormal MRI findings, handedness, surgical type, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Differences in postoperative complications and ICU admissions within 30 days and hospital length of stay (LOS) were analyzed using risk ratios and the average treatment effect (ATE). Differences in postoperative seizure freedom outcomes were quantified using Kaplan-Meier analyses.

Results: Propensity score matching (PSM) achieved a symmetric covariate balance between the pre-MetS and MetS cohorts and their non-MetS counterparts (standardized mean difference after PSM < 0.1 and ≤ 0.25, respectively). Of 1466 patients who underwent surgery for DRE, 441 (30.1%) met ≥ 2 diagnostic criteria (pre-MetS cohort, n = 339; MetS cohort, n = 102). The pre-MetS cohort had higher postoperative complication rates (RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.04-1.52) and longer LOS (ATE 1.02 [SE 0.34], p = 0.01) compared with the matched non-MetS cohort, but did not differ significantly with respect to postoperative ICU admissions (RR 1.59, 95% CI 0.66-3.83). Patients with MetS had a higher risk of postoperative complications (RR 1.99, 95% CI 1.39-2.86) than non-MetS patients, although differences in ICU admission (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.47-3.74) and LOS (ATE 0.72 [SE 0.43], p = 0.20) between groups were insignificant. There were no significant differences in postoperative seizure freedom outcomes between the pre-MetS or MetS cohorts and their non-MetS counterparts (p = 0.52 and p = 0.71, respectively).

Conclusions: Preoperative MetS could increase the risk of major postoperative morbidity after resective epilepsy surgery. Early identification and management of MetS components could be important for optimizing surgical outcomes for patients with DRE.

代谢综合征是癫痫手术后并发症的可改变危险因素。
目的:代谢综合征(MetS)已成为一种被称为“全球流行病”的日益严重的公共卫生问题。本研究的目的是研究MetS如何影响选择性神经外科干预治疗耐药癫痫(DRE)后癫痫发作自由结局和并发症,为揭示可改变的结果驱动因素提供机会。方法:从前瞻性收集的机构结果登记册中回顾性确定2000年至2017年首次切除癫痫手术的成年DRE患者。MetS被定义为具有4个诊断标准中的≥3个:肥胖、高血糖、高血压或血脂异常。术前满足2项标准的患者(前MetS队列)和术前满足≥3项标准的患者(MetS队列)与非MetS患者通过使用与手术结果相关的协变量进行匹配,包括手术年龄、性别、癫痫持续时间、发作频率、既往全发性强直-阵挛性发作、异常MRI表现、惯用手、手术类型和Charlson合并症指数。采用风险比和平均治疗效果(ATE)分析两组术后并发症、30天内ICU入院及住院时间(LOS)的差异。使用Kaplan-Meier分析对术后癫痫发作自由结局的差异进行量化。结果:倾向得分匹配(PSM)在MetS前和MetS队列与非MetS队列之间实现了对称的协变量平衡(PSM < 0.1和≤0.25后的标准化平均差异)。在1466例接受DRE手术的患者中,441例(30.1%)符合≥2项诊断标准(met前队列,n = 339;MetS队列,n = 102)。与匹配的非mets队列相比,met前队列的术后并发症发生率更高(RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.04-1.52), LOS更长(ATE 1.02 [SE 0.34], p = 0.01),但在术后ICU入院方面差异不显著(RR 1.59, 95% CI 0.66-3.83)。met患者术后并发症风险(RR 1.99, 95% CI 1.39-2.86)高于非MetS患者,但两组间ICU入院率(RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.47-3.74)和LOS (ATE 0.72 [SE 0.43], p = 0.20)差异不显著。在met前或MetS组与非MetS组之间,术后癫痫发作自由结果无显著差异(p = 0.52和p = 0.71)。结论:术前MetS可增加癫痫切除术后主要术后并发症的风险。早期识别和处理MetS成分对于优化DRE患者的手术结果非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信