Long-term pain control and reduced opioid use through novel selection criteria for peripheral nerve and motor cortex stimulation.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Kelsey DeLisio, Jonathan Miller, Jennifer Sweet
{"title":"Long-term pain control and reduced opioid use through novel selection criteria for peripheral nerve and motor cortex stimulation.","authors":"Kelsey DeLisio, Jonathan Miller, Jennifer Sweet","doi":"10.3171/2025.2.JNS232686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and motor cortex stimulation (MCS) for medically refractory neuropathic facial pain offer an alternative to traditional surgical approaches and therapeutic techniques. Many existing studies lack large sample sizes, long-term follow-up, or clear patient selection guidelines, making well-defined outcomes variable. The objective of this cohort study was to present a large series of patients with PNS or MCS and long-term outcomes and propose an algorithm for determining which surgical technique to use according to patient histories and physical examinations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-three consecutive cases of trial and permanent placement of PNS and MCS electrodes by two surgeons at a single site from January 2013 through March 2023 were retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively collected database to assess pain coverage and surgical outcomes. The average length of follow-up for this cohort was 30.12 (range 2-104) months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of those who reported at least good reduction of pain at trial (≥ 50% reduction), 80.0% of PNS and 72.7% of MCS patients experienced good (50%-74% pain relief) or excellent (75%-100% pain relief) coverage for 6 months or longer. Sixty-two percent of presurgical opioid users switched to nonopioid medications or no medication following surgery. Fifty-seven percent of patients proceeded with end-of-life implantable pulse generator revision given their continued pain relief.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Careful consideration of patient eligibility for PNS and MCS based on pain distribution and quality results in better overall outcomes, decreased opioid use, and long-term device usage in patients with neuropathic head and facial pain seeking surgical intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.2.JNS232686","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and motor cortex stimulation (MCS) for medically refractory neuropathic facial pain offer an alternative to traditional surgical approaches and therapeutic techniques. Many existing studies lack large sample sizes, long-term follow-up, or clear patient selection guidelines, making well-defined outcomes variable. The objective of this cohort study was to present a large series of patients with PNS or MCS and long-term outcomes and propose an algorithm for determining which surgical technique to use according to patient histories and physical examinations.

Methods: Thirty-three consecutive cases of trial and permanent placement of PNS and MCS electrodes by two surgeons at a single site from January 2013 through March 2023 were retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively collected database to assess pain coverage and surgical outcomes. The average length of follow-up for this cohort was 30.12 (range 2-104) months.

Results: Of those who reported at least good reduction of pain at trial (≥ 50% reduction), 80.0% of PNS and 72.7% of MCS patients experienced good (50%-74% pain relief) or excellent (75%-100% pain relief) coverage for 6 months or longer. Sixty-two percent of presurgical opioid users switched to nonopioid medications or no medication following surgery. Fifty-seven percent of patients proceeded with end-of-life implantable pulse generator revision given their continued pain relief.

Conclusions: Careful consideration of patient eligibility for PNS and MCS based on pain distribution and quality results in better overall outcomes, decreased opioid use, and long-term device usage in patients with neuropathic head and facial pain seeking surgical intervention.

通过外周神经和运动皮层刺激的新选择标准来控制长期疼痛和减少阿片类药物的使用。
目的:外周神经刺激(PNS)和运动皮质刺激(MCS)治疗难治性神经性面部疼痛,为传统的手术方法和治疗技术提供了新的选择。许多现有的研究缺乏大样本量,长期随访,或明确的患者选择指南,使得明确的结果可变。本队列研究的目的是介绍大量PNS或MCS患者及其长期预后,并根据患者病史和体格检查提出一种算法来确定使用哪种手术技术。方法:从前瞻性收集的数据库中回顾性分析2013年1月至2023年3月由两名外科医生在单个部位放置PNS和MCS电极的33例连续试验和永久放置病例,以评估疼痛覆盖和手术结果。该队列的平均随访时间为30.12个月(2-104个月)。结果:在试验中报告疼痛减轻至少良好(减轻≥50%)的患者中,80.0%的PNS患者和72.7%的MCS患者在6个月或更长时间内经历了良好(50%-74%疼痛缓解)或优异(75%-100%疼痛缓解)的覆盖。62%的手术前阿片类药物使用者在手术后转而使用非阿片类药物或不使用药物。57%的患者继续进行生命末期植入式脉冲发生器翻修,以持续缓解疼痛。结论:根据疼痛分布和质量仔细考虑患者是否有资格使用PNS和MCS,对于寻求手术干预的神经性头部和面部疼痛患者,可以获得更好的总体结果,减少阿片类药物的使用和长期器械的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信