Comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes using solely particles versus particles with coils in middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma: a longitudinal comparative cohort study.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jeffrey Turnbull, Joshua Caskey, Ammar Alsalahi, Daniel W Griepp, Shivum Desai, Boyd Richards, Prashant Kelkar, Chad F Claus, Julius Griauzde
{"title":"Comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes using solely particles versus particles with coils in middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma: a longitudinal comparative cohort study.","authors":"Jeffrey Turnbull, Joshua Caskey, Ammar Alsalahi, Daniel W Griepp, Shivum Desai, Boyd Richards, Prashant Kelkar, Chad F Claus, Julius Griauzde","doi":"10.3171/2025.3.JNS242385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) recurrence is a significant cause of morbidity in neurosurgical patients. Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAe) effectively reduces cSDH recurrence by targeting its associated inflammatory cascade. Delayed recanalization can occur from proximal branches of the middle meningeal artery (MMA) after use of particle embolic agents. Surgeons may utilize coil embolization in addition to particle embolic agents to achieve proximal vessel control. This study compares reaccumulation rates for cSDH patients undergoing particle embolization of the MMA with and without coil embolization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed on the records of patients who underwent particle MMAe with or without coils for cSDH at the authors' institution from 2021 to 2023 The primary outcome was cSDH recurrence at CT follow-up at least 1 month after MMAe.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-two patients underwent 81 embolization procedures with particles alone (n = 32) or particles and coils (n = 49). There was no significant difference in recurrence between particles versus particles and coils (6.3% vs 10.2%, p = 0.698). There was a statistical difference in procedure length (54.8 ± 28.7 vs 85.9 ± 26.5 minutes, p < 0.001) and fluoroscopy time (34.9 ± 20.8 vs 48.8 ± 24.7 minutes, p = 0.01) between patients who underwent particle embolization versus those who underwent embolization with particles and coils. A noninferiority analysis demonstrated no significant difference between groups in treatment failure, hematoma expansion, and follow-up size > 1 cm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the setting of cSDH, MMAe using particles only versus particles with coils shows similar rates of hematoma reaccumulation and resolution. Procedural time and fluoroscopy time were significantly reduced within the particle embolization-alone cohort. When comparing hematoma resolution and expansion, follow-up hematoma size > 1 cm, and decrease in hematoma size > 1 cm between groups, embolization using particles alone was not inferior to embolization using particles supplemented with coils.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.3.JNS242385","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) recurrence is a significant cause of morbidity in neurosurgical patients. Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAe) effectively reduces cSDH recurrence by targeting its associated inflammatory cascade. Delayed recanalization can occur from proximal branches of the middle meningeal artery (MMA) after use of particle embolic agents. Surgeons may utilize coil embolization in addition to particle embolic agents to achieve proximal vessel control. This study compares reaccumulation rates for cSDH patients undergoing particle embolization of the MMA with and without coil embolization.

Methods: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed on the records of patients who underwent particle MMAe with or without coils for cSDH at the authors' institution from 2021 to 2023 The primary outcome was cSDH recurrence at CT follow-up at least 1 month after MMAe.

Results: Sixty-two patients underwent 81 embolization procedures with particles alone (n = 32) or particles and coils (n = 49). There was no significant difference in recurrence between particles versus particles and coils (6.3% vs 10.2%, p = 0.698). There was a statistical difference in procedure length (54.8 ± 28.7 vs 85.9 ± 26.5 minutes, p < 0.001) and fluoroscopy time (34.9 ± 20.8 vs 48.8 ± 24.7 minutes, p = 0.01) between patients who underwent particle embolization versus those who underwent embolization with particles and coils. A noninferiority analysis demonstrated no significant difference between groups in treatment failure, hematoma expansion, and follow-up size > 1 cm.

Conclusions: In the setting of cSDH, MMAe using particles only versus particles with coils shows similar rates of hematoma reaccumulation and resolution. Procedural time and fluoroscopy time were significantly reduced within the particle embolization-alone cohort. When comparing hematoma resolution and expansion, follow-up hematoma size > 1 cm, and decrease in hematoma size > 1 cm between groups, embolization using particles alone was not inferior to embolization using particles supplemented with coils.

单独使用颗粒与颗粒结合线圈栓塞脑膜中动脉治疗慢性硬膜下血肿的临床和影像学结果的比较:一项纵向比较队列研究。
目的:慢性硬膜下血肿(cSDH)复发是神经外科患者发病的重要原因。脑膜中动脉栓塞术(MMAe)通过靶向cSDH相关的炎症级联,有效减少cSDH的复发。使用颗粒栓塞剂后,脑膜中动脉(MMA)近端分支可出现延迟再通。除了颗粒栓塞剂外,外科医生还可以使用线圈栓塞来控制近端血管。本研究比较了cSDH患者在MMA颗粒栓塞和不栓塞的情况下的再积累率。方法:对作者所在机构2021年至2023年期间接受颗粒MMAe治疗或不接受线圈治疗cSDH的患者进行前瞻性收集的数据进行回顾性分析。主要结局是MMAe后至少1个月的CT随访中cSDH复发。结果:62例患者接受了81次单独颗粒栓塞(n = 32)或颗粒和线圈栓塞(n = 49)。颗粒与颗粒和线圈的复发率无显著差异(6.3% vs 10.2%, p = 0.698)。颗粒栓塞组与颗粒+线圈栓塞组在手术时间(54.8±28.7 vs 85.9±26.5 min, p < 0.001)和透视时间(34.9±20.8 vs 48.8±24.7 min, p = 0.01)上有统计学差异。一项非劣效性分析显示,两组在治疗失败、血肿扩张和随访尺寸bbb1cm方面无显著差异。结论:在cSDH的情况下,仅使用颗粒的MMAe与带有线圈的颗粒的MMAe显示出相似的血肿再积聚和消退率。在单独颗粒栓塞组中,手术时间和透视时间明显缩短。在比较两组间血肿消退和扩张、随访血肿大小> 1cm、血肿缩小> 1cm时,单纯颗粒栓塞不逊于颗粒配合线圈栓塞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信