Comparative spatial transcriptomics of pancreatic cancer with ductal and acinar origins in mouse models

IF 6.8 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Ming Cui, Jialu Bai, Xiaoyan Chang, Ruiling Xiao, Shengwei Mo, Kevin C Soares, Sen Yang, Lei You, Quan Liao, Jin He, Ya Hu, Yupei Zhao
{"title":"Comparative spatial transcriptomics of pancreatic cancer with ductal and acinar origins in mouse models","authors":"Ming Cui,&nbsp;Jialu Bai,&nbsp;Xiaoyan Chang,&nbsp;Ruiling Xiao,&nbsp;Shengwei Mo,&nbsp;Kevin C Soares,&nbsp;Sen Yang,&nbsp;Lei You,&nbsp;Quan Liao,&nbsp;Jin He,&nbsp;Ya Hu,&nbsp;Yupei Zhao","doi":"10.1002/ctm2.70416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dear Editor,</p><p>Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a lethal malignancy, and while both acinar and ductal cells can contribute to its origin, their roles in defining PDAC subtypes remain unclear.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Investigating the cellular origin of PDAC may provide valuable insights into the biological processes of carcinogenesis and inform novel clinical classification schemes, enabling more precise and effective diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Acinar cell-derived PDAC, often through acinar-to-ductal metaplasia (ADM), has been well-studied using models such as <i>Pdx1-Cre</i> or <i>Ptf1a-Cre</i>.<span><sup>2-4</sup></span> Ductal cells can also give rise to precursor lesions, including intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN), which is an imaging-recognizable lesion that is helpful for the early diagnosis of PDAC.<span><sup>5</sup></span> However, models focusing on ductal cell-derived PDAC remain limited. Transcription factor Sox9, a hallmark marker of pancreatic ductal cells, enables lineage-specific gene editing via <i>Sox9-CreER</i>.<span><sup>6, 7</sup></span> In this study, we induced the carcinogenesis of PDAC by conditionally activating <i>Kras<sup>G12D</sup></i> and deleting <i>Trp53</i> in ductal or acinar cells. Compared to the well-established KPPC (<i>Kras<sup>LSL-G12D/+</sup>;Trp53<sup>fl/fl</sup>;Pdx1-CreER</i>) mouse model, the KPPS (<i>Kras<sup>LSL-G12D/+</sup>;Trp53<sup>fl/fl</sup>;Sox9-CreER</i>) mouse model produces a substantial proportion of IPMN with varying pathological grades. Spatial transcriptomics further revealed partially shared, yet distinct, molecular and tumour microenvironment features between the KPPC and KPPS models, which were validated in human datasets.</p><p>We developed the KPPS mouse model and harvested pancreatic tissues between weeks 4 and 24 post-tamoxifen induction (Figure 1A,B and Figure S1A). H&amp;E staining was performed on pancreatic formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections from both KPPS and KPPC models (Figure 1C and Figure S1B). Histological analysis of tissues collected from KPPS mice revealed progressive development of IPMN, including low-grade (LG), high-grade (HG), and IPMN-associated invasive carcinoma (IPMN-IC), which exhibited characteristic tubular adenocarcinoma features (Histological criteria are elaborated in the supplementary information; Figure 1C,D). By 24 weeks post-Tamoxifen injection, all KPPS mice had progressed to invasive carcinoma, with IPMN-IC being the predominant phenotype, accounting for more than 80% of the cases, accompanied by conventional PDAC (Figure 1C, D). Immunohistochemical analysis of mucins (MUC) revealed that IPMN lesions from KPPS mice exhibited high expression of MUC1, weak expression of MUC5AC, and minimal to no expression of MUC2 (Figure 1E and Figure S1C), suggesting a non-intestinal IPMN subtype (including gastric and pancreatobiliary types). Notably, the IPMN-IC lesions predominantly exhibited features of the pancreatobiliary subtype. Survival analysis indicated that the median survival of KPPS mice was 20 weeks post-Tamoxifen (<i>n</i> = 46), significantly longer than KPPC mice (13 weeks, <i>n</i> = 25; <i>p </i>&lt; 0.0001; Figure 1F). Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed on pancreatic tissues evaluated as normal morphology (KPPS5000 and KPPS5038), IPMN-IC (KPPS6711 and KPPS5294), and conventional PDAC (KPPC1705 and KPPC2604), with spleen tissue used as a control to identify somatic mutations (Figure 1G). Mutations identified in cancer-related signalling pathways, such as PI3K-Akt and MAPK signalling pathways, were more frequent in the KPPC compared to the KPPS model (Figure 1G). A ductal-derived KPPS cell line (KPPS5333) was established, demonstrated stable epithelial phenotype and robust growth with a doubling time of ∼31 h in proliferation assays (Figure S2B,C). To create a subcutaneous tumour model, 5 × 10⁶ KPPS5333 cells were injected into the scapular region of 8-week C57BL/6J mice. Tumour growth was monitored, and by day 14, most tumours exceeded 10 mm in diameter (Figure S2D,E).</p><p>Spatial transcriptomics analysis was performed on FFPE tumour samples harvested from KPPS and KPPC mouse models. The tumour epithelium of both models exhibited significant differences in pathway enrichment compared to normal pancreatic tissue (Figure 2A). Differential gene analysis was conducted for the tumour epithelium and stroma in both models (Figure 2B,C). Among these differentially expressed genes, some were specifically associated with pancreatic ductal and acinar cells (Figure 2D,E). In the pancreas, Tm4sf4 and Cdh17 are primarily expressed in ductal cells, and studies have shown that Tm4sf4 co-localizes with Sox9 expression.<span><sup>8, 9</sup></span> Our results indicate that Tm4sf4 and Cdh17 are significantly upregulated in KPPS tumour (Figure 2D), which may serve as biomarkers for identifying ductal cell-derived PDAC. Additionally, markers specific to acinar cells, including Cel, Tff2, Ctrb1, Cela3b, and Reg1, were expressed in the KPPC tumour (Figure 2D,E, and Figure S4D). Notably, compared to KPPS model, the surrounding normal pancreatic tissue in KPPC tumours exhibited upregulation of Krt19 and downregulation of acinar cell markers, suggesting that the pancreatic tissue adjacent to KPPC tumours may be undergoing ADM (Figure 2D). Additionally, Muc5ac was upregulated in the tumour epithelium of KPPC mice but nearly absent in that of KPPS mice (Figure 2D). The regulatory intensity of transcription factors exhibited significant differences between the epithelial components of KPPS and KPPC tumours (Figure S5). Immune profiling using CIBERSORT showed that both models harboured immunosuppressive microenvironments (Figure 2F,G; Figures S6 and S7). Compared to KPPC, the KPPS tumour microenvironment showed a pronounced enrichment of dendritic cells (DCs), particularly resting DCs (both <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001), accompanied by a significant reduction of plasma cells (both <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001, Figure 2G).</p><p>To further assess clinical relevance, 178 human PDAC datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were clustered into ductal-dominant and acinar-dominant groups based on ductal/acinar markers (Figure 3A). Transcriptomic analysis revealed enrichment of pathways related to KRAS, JAK-STAT, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in acinar-dominant PDAC, while ductal-dominant PDAC showed upregulation of MTOR, MYC, glycolysis, and antigen presentation pathways (Figure 3B,C). CIBERSORT and immunophenoscore (IPS) analyses confirmed enrichments of resting DCs and antigen presentation in ductal-dominant tumours (Figure 3D,E).</p><p>Our study demonstrates the dual origins of PDAC, with distinct histological, molecular, and immunological profiles, showing similar results with X.<span><sup>7</sup></span> We observed that KPPS models predominantly developed IPMN-IC, displaying a characteristic of the pancreatobiliary subtype, supporting its utility as a robust model for studying PDAC. Gene expression profiling revealed upregulation of ductal markers (Tm4sf4, Cdh17) in KPPS, and acinar markers (Cel, Tff2, etc.) in KPPC. This distinction offers new insights into the molecular subtypes of PDAC, which may contribute to precise diagnosis, prognosis prediction and therapeutic strategy.</p><p><i>Conceptualization</i>: Ming Cui, Jialu Bai, Ya Hu and Yupei Zhao. <i>Methodology</i>: Ming Cui, Jialu Bai, Xiaoyan Chang, Ruiling Xiao and Shengwei Mo. Investigation: Ming Cui and Jialu Bai. <i>Data Analysis and Curation</i>: Ming Cui, Jialu Bai, Ruiling Xiao and Sen Yang. <i>Visualization</i>: Ming Cui and Jialu Bai. <i>Writing-Original Draft</i>: Ming Cui and Jialu Bai. <i>Writing-Review &amp; Editing</i>: Kevin C Soares, Sen Yang, Lei You, Quan Liao, Jin He, Ya Hu and Yupei Zhao. Supervision and funding acquisition: Ming Cui, Jialu Bai, Ya Hu and Yupei Zhao.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p><p>This work was supported by funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 82302076), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (grant no. 3332024199), the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) (grant no. 2023-I2M-2-002), National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding (grant no. 2022-PUMCH-D-001), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (grant no. 7224340), Beijing Science and Technology Innovation Foundation for University or College students (grant no. 2024dcxm057), Milstein Medical Asian American Partnership (MMAAP) foundation and Peking Union Medical College Hospital Talent Cultivation Program Category D UHB12625.</p><p>The ethical aspects of the research were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, Beijing Vitalstar Biotechnology Co., Ltd. before initiation (Ethical approval number: VST-SY-20210108).</p>","PeriodicalId":10189,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Medicine","volume":"15 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ctm2.70416","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ctm2.70416","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dear Editor,

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a lethal malignancy, and while both acinar and ductal cells can contribute to its origin, their roles in defining PDAC subtypes remain unclear.1 Investigating the cellular origin of PDAC may provide valuable insights into the biological processes of carcinogenesis and inform novel clinical classification schemes, enabling more precise and effective diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Acinar cell-derived PDAC, often through acinar-to-ductal metaplasia (ADM), has been well-studied using models such as Pdx1-Cre or Ptf1a-Cre.2-4 Ductal cells can also give rise to precursor lesions, including intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN), which is an imaging-recognizable lesion that is helpful for the early diagnosis of PDAC.5 However, models focusing on ductal cell-derived PDAC remain limited. Transcription factor Sox9, a hallmark marker of pancreatic ductal cells, enables lineage-specific gene editing via Sox9-CreER.6, 7 In this study, we induced the carcinogenesis of PDAC by conditionally activating KrasG12D and deleting Trp53 in ductal or acinar cells. Compared to the well-established KPPC (KrasLSL-G12D/+;Trp53fl/fl;Pdx1-CreER) mouse model, the KPPS (KrasLSL-G12D/+;Trp53fl/fl;Sox9-CreER) mouse model produces a substantial proportion of IPMN with varying pathological grades. Spatial transcriptomics further revealed partially shared, yet distinct, molecular and tumour microenvironment features between the KPPC and KPPS models, which were validated in human datasets.

We developed the KPPS mouse model and harvested pancreatic tissues between weeks 4 and 24 post-tamoxifen induction (Figure 1A,B and Figure S1A). H&E staining was performed on pancreatic formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections from both KPPS and KPPC models (Figure 1C and Figure S1B). Histological analysis of tissues collected from KPPS mice revealed progressive development of IPMN, including low-grade (LG), high-grade (HG), and IPMN-associated invasive carcinoma (IPMN-IC), which exhibited characteristic tubular adenocarcinoma features (Histological criteria are elaborated in the supplementary information; Figure 1C,D). By 24 weeks post-Tamoxifen injection, all KPPS mice had progressed to invasive carcinoma, with IPMN-IC being the predominant phenotype, accounting for more than 80% of the cases, accompanied by conventional PDAC (Figure 1C, D). Immunohistochemical analysis of mucins (MUC) revealed that IPMN lesions from KPPS mice exhibited high expression of MUC1, weak expression of MUC5AC, and minimal to no expression of MUC2 (Figure 1E and Figure S1C), suggesting a non-intestinal IPMN subtype (including gastric and pancreatobiliary types). Notably, the IPMN-IC lesions predominantly exhibited features of the pancreatobiliary subtype. Survival analysis indicated that the median survival of KPPS mice was 20 weeks post-Tamoxifen (n = 46), significantly longer than KPPC mice (13 weeks, n = 25; < 0.0001; Figure 1F). Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed on pancreatic tissues evaluated as normal morphology (KPPS5000 and KPPS5038), IPMN-IC (KPPS6711 and KPPS5294), and conventional PDAC (KPPC1705 and KPPC2604), with spleen tissue used as a control to identify somatic mutations (Figure 1G). Mutations identified in cancer-related signalling pathways, such as PI3K-Akt and MAPK signalling pathways, were more frequent in the KPPC compared to the KPPS model (Figure 1G). A ductal-derived KPPS cell line (KPPS5333) was established, demonstrated stable epithelial phenotype and robust growth with a doubling time of ∼31 h in proliferation assays (Figure S2B,C). To create a subcutaneous tumour model, 5 × 10⁶ KPPS5333 cells were injected into the scapular region of 8-week C57BL/6J mice. Tumour growth was monitored, and by day 14, most tumours exceeded 10 mm in diameter (Figure S2D,E).

Spatial transcriptomics analysis was performed on FFPE tumour samples harvested from KPPS and KPPC mouse models. The tumour epithelium of both models exhibited significant differences in pathway enrichment compared to normal pancreatic tissue (Figure 2A). Differential gene analysis was conducted for the tumour epithelium and stroma in both models (Figure 2B,C). Among these differentially expressed genes, some were specifically associated with pancreatic ductal and acinar cells (Figure 2D,E). In the pancreas, Tm4sf4 and Cdh17 are primarily expressed in ductal cells, and studies have shown that Tm4sf4 co-localizes with Sox9 expression.8, 9 Our results indicate that Tm4sf4 and Cdh17 are significantly upregulated in KPPS tumour (Figure 2D), which may serve as biomarkers for identifying ductal cell-derived PDAC. Additionally, markers specific to acinar cells, including Cel, Tff2, Ctrb1, Cela3b, and Reg1, were expressed in the KPPC tumour (Figure 2D,E, and Figure S4D). Notably, compared to KPPS model, the surrounding normal pancreatic tissue in KPPC tumours exhibited upregulation of Krt19 and downregulation of acinar cell markers, suggesting that the pancreatic tissue adjacent to KPPC tumours may be undergoing ADM (Figure 2D). Additionally, Muc5ac was upregulated in the tumour epithelium of KPPC mice but nearly absent in that of KPPS mice (Figure 2D). The regulatory intensity of transcription factors exhibited significant differences between the epithelial components of KPPS and KPPC tumours (Figure S5). Immune profiling using CIBERSORT showed that both models harboured immunosuppressive microenvironments (Figure 2F,G; Figures S6 and S7). Compared to KPPC, the KPPS tumour microenvironment showed a pronounced enrichment of dendritic cells (DCs), particularly resting DCs (both p < 0.0001), accompanied by a significant reduction of plasma cells (both p < 0.0001, Figure 2G).

To further assess clinical relevance, 178 human PDAC datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were clustered into ductal-dominant and acinar-dominant groups based on ductal/acinar markers (Figure 3A). Transcriptomic analysis revealed enrichment of pathways related to KRAS, JAK-STAT, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in acinar-dominant PDAC, while ductal-dominant PDAC showed upregulation of MTOR, MYC, glycolysis, and antigen presentation pathways (Figure 3B,C). CIBERSORT and immunophenoscore (IPS) analyses confirmed enrichments of resting DCs and antigen presentation in ductal-dominant tumours (Figure 3D,E).

Our study demonstrates the dual origins of PDAC, with distinct histological, molecular, and immunological profiles, showing similar results with X.7 We observed that KPPS models predominantly developed IPMN-IC, displaying a characteristic of the pancreatobiliary subtype, supporting its utility as a robust model for studying PDAC. Gene expression profiling revealed upregulation of ductal markers (Tm4sf4, Cdh17) in KPPS, and acinar markers (Cel, Tff2, etc.) in KPPC. This distinction offers new insights into the molecular subtypes of PDAC, which may contribute to precise diagnosis, prognosis prediction and therapeutic strategy.

Conceptualization: Ming Cui, Jialu Bai, Ya Hu and Yupei Zhao. Methodology: Ming Cui, Jialu Bai, Xiaoyan Chang, Ruiling Xiao and Shengwei Mo. Investigation: Ming Cui and Jialu Bai. Data Analysis and Curation: Ming Cui, Jialu Bai, Ruiling Xiao and Sen Yang. Visualization: Ming Cui and Jialu Bai. Writing-Original Draft: Ming Cui and Jialu Bai. Writing-Review & Editing: Kevin C Soares, Sen Yang, Lei You, Quan Liao, Jin He, Ya Hu and Yupei Zhao. Supervision and funding acquisition: Ming Cui, Jialu Bai, Ya Hu and Yupei Zhao.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

This work was supported by funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 82302076), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (grant no. 3332024199), the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) (grant no. 2023-I2M-2-002), National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding (grant no. 2022-PUMCH-D-001), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (grant no. 7224340), Beijing Science and Technology Innovation Foundation for University or College students (grant no. 2024dcxm057), Milstein Medical Asian American Partnership (MMAAP) foundation and Peking Union Medical College Hospital Talent Cultivation Program Category D UHB12625.

The ethical aspects of the research were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, Beijing Vitalstar Biotechnology Co., Ltd. before initiation (Ethical approval number: VST-SY-20210108).

Abstract Image

在小鼠模型中比较起源于导管和腺泡的胰腺癌的空间转录组学
胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)是一种致死性恶性肿瘤,虽然腺泡细胞和导管细胞都可能导致其起源,但它们在确定PDAC亚型中的作用尚不清楚研究PDAC的细胞起源可以为癌症发生的生物学过程提供有价值的见解,并为新的临床分类方案提供信息,从而实现更精确和有效的诊断和治疗策略。腺泡细胞衍生的PDAC,通常通过腺泡到导管化生(ADM),已经使用Pdx1-Cre或Ptf1a-Cre等模型进行了充分的研究。2-4导管细胞也可引起前体病变,包括导管内乳头状粘液瘤(IPMN),这是一种影像学可识别的病变,有助于PDAC的早期诊断。5然而,专注于导管细胞源性PDAC的模型仍然有限。转录因子Sox9是胰腺导管细胞的标志性标志物,可通过Sox9- creer实现谱系特异性基因编辑。6,7在本研究中,我们通过在导管细胞或腺泡细胞中条件性激活KrasG12D并删除Trp53来诱导PDAC的癌变。与已建立的KPPC (KrasLSL-G12D/+;Trp53fl/fl;Pdx1-CreER)小鼠模型相比,KPPS (KrasLSL-G12D/+;Trp53fl/fl;Sox9-CreER)小鼠模型产生了相当比例的不同病理等级的IPMN。空间转录组学进一步揭示了KPPC和KPPS模型之间部分共享但不同的分子和肿瘤微环境特征,这些特征在人类数据集中得到了验证。我们建立了KPPS小鼠模型,并在他莫昔芬诱导后第4周至第24周收获胰腺组织(图1A,B和图S1A)。对KPPS和KPPC模型的胰腺福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(FFPE)组织切片进行H&amp;E染色(图1C和图S1B)。从KPPS小鼠收集的组织的组织学分析显示IPMN的进行性发展,包括低级别(LG),高级别(HG)和IPMN相关的浸润性癌(IPMN- ic),其表现出典型的管状腺癌特征(组织学标准在补充信息中详细阐述;图1 c, D)。注射他莫昔芬后24周,所有KPPS小鼠均进展为浸润性癌,以IPMN-IC为主要表型,占80%以上,并伴有常规PDAC(图1C, D)。mucins (mucc)免疫组化分析显示,KPPS小鼠IPMN病变MUC1高表达,MUC5AC弱表达,MUC2低表达或不表达(图1E和图S1C),提示非肠道IPMN亚型(包括胃型和胰胆型)。值得注意的是,IPMN-IC病变主要表现为胰胆管亚型。生存分析显示,KPPS小鼠在他莫昔芬治疗后的中位生存期为20周(n = 46),显著长于KPPC小鼠(13周,n = 25;p & lt;0.0001;图1 f)。对胰腺组织进行全外显子组测序(WES),评估为正常形态(KPPS5000和KPPS5038)、IPMN-IC (KPPS6711和KPPS5294)和常规PDAC (KPPC1705和KPPC2604),并以脾脏组织作为对照来鉴定体细胞突变(图1G)。与KPPS模型相比,在癌症相关信号通路(如PI3K-Akt和MAPK信号通路)中发现的突变在KPPC中更为频繁(图1G)。建立了导管来源的KPPS细胞系(KPPS5333),在增殖试验中显示出稳定的上皮表型和强劲的生长,增殖时间翻倍至31小时(图S2B,C)。将5 × 10⁶KPPS5333细胞注射于8周龄C57BL/6J小鼠肩胛骨区,建立皮下肿瘤模型。监测肿瘤生长情况,到第14天,大多数肿瘤直径超过10mm(图S2D,E)。对KPPS和KPPC小鼠模型中收获的FFPE肿瘤样本进行空间转录组学分析。与正常胰腺组织相比,两种模型的肿瘤上皮在通路富集方面表现出显著差异(图2A)。对两种模型的肿瘤上皮和间质进行差异基因分析(图2B,C)。在这些差异表达的基因中,一些与胰腺导管和腺泡细胞特异性相关(图2D,E)。在胰腺中,Tm4sf4和Cdh17主要在导管细胞中表达,研究表明Tm4sf4与Sox9表达共定位。8,9我们的研究结果表明,Tm4sf4和Cdh17在KPPS肿瘤中显著上调(图2D),这可能作为识别导管细胞源性PDAC的生物标志物。此外,在KPPC肿瘤中表达了腺泡细胞特异性标志物,包括Cel、Tff2、Ctrb1、Cela3b和Reg1(图2D、E和图S4D)。 值得注意的是,与KPPS模型相比,KPPC肿瘤周围正常胰腺组织表现出Krt19上调和腺泡细胞标记物下调,表明KPPC肿瘤周围胰腺组织可能正在经历ADM(图2D)。此外,Muc5ac在KPPC小鼠的肿瘤上皮中表达上调,而在KPPS小鼠的肿瘤上皮中几乎不表达(图2D)。转录因子的调控强度在KPPS和KPPC肿瘤的上皮成分中表现出显著差异(图S5)。使用CIBERSORT进行免疫分析显示,两种模型都存在免疫抑制微环境(图2F,G;图S6和S7)。与KPPC相比,KPPS肿瘤微环境显示出明显的树突状细胞(DCs)富集,尤其是静息树突状细胞(p &lt;0.0001),同时伴有浆细胞的显著减少(p &lt;0.0001,图2G)。为了进一步评估临床相关性,来自癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)的178个人类PDAC数据集基于导管/腺泡标记聚类为导管显性组和腺泡显性组(图3A)。转录组学分析显示,在腺泡显性PDAC中,与KRAS、JAK-STAT和上皮-间质转化(EMT)相关的通路富集,而导管显性PDAC则显示MTOR、MYC、糖酵解和抗原递呈通路上调(图3B,C)。CIBERSORT和免疫表型评分(IPS)分析证实了导管显性肿瘤中静息dc和抗原呈递的富集(图3D,E)。我们的研究证明了PDAC的双重起源,具有不同的组织学,分子和免疫学特征,显示出与X.7相似的结果。我们观察到KPPS模型主要发展IPMN-IC,显示出胰胆管亚型的特征,支持其作为研究PDAC的强大模型的实用价值。基因表达谱显示KPPS中导管标记物(Tm4sf4、Cdh17)和KPPC中腺泡标记物(Cel、Tff2等)上调。这一区别为PDAC的分子亚型研究提供了新的思路,有助于精确诊断、预测预后和制定治疗策略。概念:崔明、白家录、胡亚、赵玉培。方法:崔明、白家录、常晓燕、肖瑞玲、莫胜伟。调查:崔明、白家录。数据分析与策展:崔明、白家录、肖瑞玲、杨森。可视化:崔明,白家录。原稿:崔明、白家璐。Writing-Review,编辑:苏亚雷斯、杨森、尤蕾、廖全、何瑾、胡亚、赵玉培监管与融资收购:崔明、白家录、胡亚、赵玉培。作者声明无利益冲突。本研究得到国家自然科学基金资助(基金批准号:no. 811@qq.com)。82302076),中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(批准号:82302076);3332024199), CAMS医学科学创新基金(批准号:2023-I2M-2-002),国家高水平医院临床研究经费(批准号:北京市自然科学基金资助项目(资助号:20122012pumch - d -001);7224340),北京市大学生科技创新基金项目(批准号:2024dcxm057), Milstein医疗亚裔美国人合作(MMAAP)基金会和北京协和医院人才培养计划D类UHB12625。本研究的伦理方面在启动前由北京维塔斯达生物技术有限公司机构动物保护与使用委员会审查批准(伦理批准号:VST-SY-20210108)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
1.90%
发文量
450
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Medicine (CTM) is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal dedicated to accelerating the translation of preclinical research into clinical applications and fostering communication between basic and clinical scientists. It highlights the clinical potential and application of various fields including biotechnologies, biomaterials, bioengineering, biomarkers, molecular medicine, omics science, bioinformatics, immunology, molecular imaging, drug discovery, regulation, and health policy. With a focus on the bench-to-bedside approach, CTM prioritizes studies and clinical observations that generate hypotheses relevant to patients and diseases, guiding investigations in cellular and molecular medicine. The journal encourages submissions from clinicians, researchers, policymakers, and industry professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信