A meta-analysis approach to reveal the consensual points in the development of materials for photocatalytic methane reform to methanol†

IF 4.2 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Ricardo Marques e Silva, Eduardo Henrique Dias, Marcos Augusto Ribeiro da Silva, Milene Corso Mitsuyuki, Jessica Ariane de Oliveira, Gelson Tiago dos Santos Tavares da Silva, Jean Castro da Cruz and Caue Ribeiro
{"title":"A meta-analysis approach to reveal the consensual points in the development of materials for photocatalytic methane reform to methanol†","authors":"Ricardo Marques e Silva, Eduardo Henrique Dias, Marcos Augusto Ribeiro da Silva, Milene Corso Mitsuyuki, Jessica Ariane de Oliveira, Gelson Tiago dos Santos Tavares da Silva, Jean Castro da Cruz and Caue Ribeiro","doi":"10.1039/D5CY00349K","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Significant methane reserves remain underutilized due to the challenges posed by the transition to a decarbonized economy. Consequently, methane combustion should be replaced by pathways that directly convert methane into high-value-added chemicals, aiming to achieve net-zero emissions. This represents a challenge in the current state of the art—particularly in photocatalytic materials, which can harness direct sunlight as an energy source. However, research lacks a consistent roadmap, which is essential to establish a consensus in the literature by statistically identifying promising catalytic materials and reaction pathways. To address this, we propose a meta-analytical study based on a systematic collection of relevant data from the literature to uncover consensus points in photocatalytic research focused on methane conversion to chemicals. The findings highlight challenges arising from the lack of standardization in reporting results and experimental conditions, which hinder proper comparisons between studies. Ultimately, the authors advocate for an in-depth discussion on the standardization of research methodologies, emphasizing the necessity of adhering to uniform protocols in experimental procedures and data reporting to ensure the reliability and comparability of results.</p>","PeriodicalId":66,"journal":{"name":"Catalysis Science & Technology","volume":" 15","pages":" 4501-4514"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catalysis Science & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/cy/d5cy00349k","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Significant methane reserves remain underutilized due to the challenges posed by the transition to a decarbonized economy. Consequently, methane combustion should be replaced by pathways that directly convert methane into high-value-added chemicals, aiming to achieve net-zero emissions. This represents a challenge in the current state of the art—particularly in photocatalytic materials, which can harness direct sunlight as an energy source. However, research lacks a consistent roadmap, which is essential to establish a consensus in the literature by statistically identifying promising catalytic materials and reaction pathways. To address this, we propose a meta-analytical study based on a systematic collection of relevant data from the literature to uncover consensus points in photocatalytic research focused on methane conversion to chemicals. The findings highlight challenges arising from the lack of standardization in reporting results and experimental conditions, which hinder proper comparisons between studies. Ultimately, the authors advocate for an in-depth discussion on the standardization of research methodologies, emphasizing the necessity of adhering to uniform protocols in experimental procedures and data reporting to ensure the reliability and comparability of results.

Abstract Image

一种荟萃分析方法揭示了光催化甲烷转化为甲醇†的材料开发中的共识点
由于向脱碳经济转型带来的挑战,大量甲烷储量仍未得到充分利用。因此,甲烷燃烧应该被直接将甲烷转化为高附加值化学品的途径所取代,旨在实现净零排放。这对目前的技术来说是一个挑战,尤其是光催化材料,它可以利用直射阳光作为能源。然而,研究缺乏一致的路线图,这对于通过统计识别有前途的催化材料和反应途径在文献中建立共识至关重要。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了一项基于文献中相关数据的系统收集的元分析研究,以揭示光催化研究中甲烷转化为化学品的共识点。这些发现突出了报告结果和实验条件缺乏标准化所带来的挑战,这阻碍了研究之间的适当比较。最后,作者主张对研究方法的标准化进行深入讨论,强调在实验程序和数据报告中遵守统一协议的必要性,以确保结果的可靠性和可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Catalysis Science & Technology
Catalysis Science & Technology CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL-
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
6.00%
发文量
587
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: A multidisciplinary journal focusing on cutting edge research across all fundamental science and technological aspects of catalysis. Editor-in-chief: Bert Weckhuysen Impact factor: 5.0 Time to first decision (peer reviewed only): 31 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信