Can ChatGPT serve as a writing collaborator? Insights from Chinese EFL learners

IF 5.6 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Yu Huang , Di Wang
{"title":"Can ChatGPT serve as a writing collaborator? Insights from Chinese EFL learners","authors":"Yu Huang ,&nbsp;Di Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although integrating generative artificial intelligence chatbots into L2 writing classrooms has grown in recent years, little is known about the nature of student-chatbot collaboration and its impact on students' final writing products. This study investigates how Chinese EFL learners interact with ChatGPT in an argumentative writing task and examines the influence of student-chatbot collaboration on the quality of writing, as well as students' perceptions of ChatGPT as a writing collaborator. Conducted at a tier-one university in China, this study involved nine students with over ten years of English learning experience and upper-intermediate English proficiency. Participants completed an argumentative writing task with ChatGPT, followed by semi-structured interviews. Data from interaction logs, think-aloud protocols, final writing texts, and interviews were qualitatively analysed. Findings revealed a “student-directed, chatbot-mediated” interaction mode, where students actively directed the writing process and used ChatGPT to enhance idea generation, develop arguments, provide evidence, and support language use. ChatGPT also contributed to lexical and syntactic variety, offering feedback on grammar and genre conventions. Students perceived ChatGPT as a helpful tool for inspiring ideas and improving language expression. Compared to peer collaboration, ChatGPT was seen as advantageous due to its advanced language proficiency, extensive knowledge base, and flexibility. However, some students reported challenges, such as difficulties in processing the vast amount of information provided by ChatGPT and frustrations when the chatbot did not fully understand their needs or provided unexpected responses. This study concludes with a discussion on the potential pedagogical implications of integrating chatbots like ChatGPT into L2 writing instruction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 103775"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"System","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X2500185X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although integrating generative artificial intelligence chatbots into L2 writing classrooms has grown in recent years, little is known about the nature of student-chatbot collaboration and its impact on students' final writing products. This study investigates how Chinese EFL learners interact with ChatGPT in an argumentative writing task and examines the influence of student-chatbot collaboration on the quality of writing, as well as students' perceptions of ChatGPT as a writing collaborator. Conducted at a tier-one university in China, this study involved nine students with over ten years of English learning experience and upper-intermediate English proficiency. Participants completed an argumentative writing task with ChatGPT, followed by semi-structured interviews. Data from interaction logs, think-aloud protocols, final writing texts, and interviews were qualitatively analysed. Findings revealed a “student-directed, chatbot-mediated” interaction mode, where students actively directed the writing process and used ChatGPT to enhance idea generation, develop arguments, provide evidence, and support language use. ChatGPT also contributed to lexical and syntactic variety, offering feedback on grammar and genre conventions. Students perceived ChatGPT as a helpful tool for inspiring ideas and improving language expression. Compared to peer collaboration, ChatGPT was seen as advantageous due to its advanced language proficiency, extensive knowledge base, and flexibility. However, some students reported challenges, such as difficulties in processing the vast amount of information provided by ChatGPT and frustrations when the chatbot did not fully understand their needs or provided unexpected responses. This study concludes with a discussion on the potential pedagogical implications of integrating chatbots like ChatGPT into L2 writing instruction.
ChatGPT可以作为写作合作者吗?中国英语学习者的见解
尽管近年来,将生成式人工智能聊天机器人整合到第二语言写作课堂的情况有所增加,但人们对学生与聊天机器人合作的性质及其对学生最终写作成果的影响知之甚少。本研究调查了中国英语学习者在议论文写作任务中如何与聊天机器人互动,并考察了学生与聊天机器人合作对写作质量的影响,以及学生对聊天机器人作为写作合作者的看法。本研究在中国一所一流大学进行,涉及9名英语学习经验超过十年,英语水平处于中上水平的学生。参与者用ChatGPT完成了一项议论文写作任务,随后是半结构化的访谈。来自互动日志、有声思考协议、最终写作文本和访谈的数据进行了定性分析。研究结果揭示了一种“学生主导,聊天机器人介导”的互动模式,在这种模式下,学生积极地指导写作过程,并使用聊天机器人来增强想法的产生,发展论点,提供证据,并支持语言的使用。ChatGPT还对词汇和句法的多样性做出了贡献,提供了关于语法和体裁惯例的反馈。学生认为ChatGPT是激发灵感和提高语言表达的有用工具。与对等协作相比,ChatGPT由于其先进的语言熟练程度、广泛的知识基础和灵活性而被视为具有优势。然而,一些学生反映了挑战,比如在处理ChatGPT提供的大量信息时遇到困难,以及聊天机器人不能完全理解他们的需求或提供意想不到的响应时感到沮丧。本研究最后讨论了将聊天机器人(如ChatGPT)整合到第二语言写作教学中的潜在教学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
System
System Multiple-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: This international journal is devoted to the applications of educational technology and applied linguistics to problems of foreign language teaching and learning. Attention is paid to all languages and to problems associated with the study and teaching of English as a second or foreign language. The journal serves as a vehicle of expression for colleagues in developing countries. System prefers its contributors to provide articles which have a sound theoretical base with a visible practical application which can be generalized. The review section may take up works of a more theoretical nature to broaden the background.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信